Influence of implant-abutment connection structure on peri-implant bone level in a second molar: A 1-year randomized controlled trial

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, Jin-Cheol [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jungwon [3 ]
Kim, Sungtae [4 ]
Koo, Ki-Tae [4 ]
Kim, Hae-Young [5 ]
Yeo, In-Sung Luke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Periodontol, Dent Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Periodontol, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS | 2019年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; Dental implant-abutment design; Alveolar bone loss; DIFFERENT PROSTHETIC INTERFACES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; EXTERNAL CONNECTIONS; NECK CONFIGURATIONS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; MORSE TAPER; PLATFORM; RESISTANCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4047/jap.2019.11.3.147
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two different implant-abutment connection structures with identical implant design on peri-implant bone level. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This clinical study was a patient-blind randomized controlled trial following the CONSORT 2010 checklists. This trial was conducted in 24 patients recruited between March 2013 and July 2015. Implants with internal friction connection were compared to those with external hex connection. One implant for each patient was installed, replacing the second molar. Implant-supported crowns were delivered at four months after implant insertion. Standardized periapical radiographs were taken at prosthesis delivery (baseline), and one year after delivery. On the radiographs, distance from implant shoulder to first bone-to-implant contact (DIB) and peri-implant area were measured, which were the primary and secondary outcome, respectively. RESULTS. Eleven external and eleven internal implants were analyzed. Mean changes of DIB from baseline to 1-year postloading were 0.59 (0.95) mm for the external and 0.01 (0.68) mm for the internal connection. Although no significant differences were found between the two groups, medium effect size was found in DIB between the connections (Cohen's d = 0.67). CONCLUSION. Considering the effect size in DIB, this study suggested the possibility of the internal friction connection structure for more effective preservation of marginal bone.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of implant-abutment connection on osteoimmunological and microbiological parameters in short implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Ozturk, Veli Ozgen
    Emingil, Gulnur
    Bostanci, Nagihan
    Belibasakis, Georgios N.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) : E111 - E120
  • [22] Influence of controlled immediate loading and implant design on peri-implant bone formation
    Vandamme, Katleen
    Naert, Ignace
    Geris, Liesbet
    Vander Sloten, Jozef
    Puers, Robert
    Duyck, Joke
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 34 (02) : 172 - 181
  • [23] Influence of repeated implant-abutment manipulation on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases in complete arch restorations. A retrospective analysis
    Krebs, M.
    Greilich, L.
    Weigl, P.
    Hess, P.
    Dahmer, I.
    Begic, A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [24] The Influence of Abutment Macrodesign on Facial Peri-implant Tissue Dimensions for Guided Placed and Restored Implants at Healed Sites: 1-Year CBCT Findings from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Koutouzis, Theofilos
    Ali, Abdulaziz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 41 (02) : 277 - +
  • [25] Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Conditioning by Means of Customized Healing Abutment: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Beretta, Mario
    Poli, Pier Paolo
    Pieriboni, Silvia
    Tansella, Sebastian
    Manfredini, Mattia
    Cicciu, Marco
    Maiorana, Carlo
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (18)
  • [26] Influence of Implant-Prosthetic Connection on Peri-implant Bone Loss: A Prospective Clinical Trial with 2-Year Follow-up
    Agustin-Panadero, Ruben
    Leon-Martinez, Raquel
    Labaig-Rueda, Carlos
    Faus-Lopez, Joan
    Fernanda Sola-Ruiz, Ma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (04) : 963 - 968
  • [27] Influence of the Crown-Implant Connection on the Preservation of Peri-Implant Bone: A Retrospective Multifactorial Analysis
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Fernandez-Jimenez, Andres
    O'Valle, Francisco
    Monje, Alberto
    Silvestre, Francisco J.
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    Sanchez-Fernandez, Elena
    Catena, Andres
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (02) : 384 - 390
  • [28] Influence of buccal emergence profile designs on peri-implant tissues: A randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Juan
    Tang, Yiman
    Qiu, Lixin
    Yu, Huajie
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 329 - 338
  • [29] Impact of Insertion Torque and Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Bone Level: A Randomized Split-Mouth Trial
    Hof, Markus
    Pommer, Bernhard
    Strbac, Georg D.
    Vasak, Christoph
    Agis, Hermann
    Zechner, Werner
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05) : 668 - 674
  • [30] Immediately loaded mini dental implants as overdenture retainers: 1-Year cohort study of implant stability and peri-implant marginal bone level
    Scepanovic, Miodrag
    Todorovic, Aleksandar
    Markovic, Aleksa
    Patrnogic, Vesna
    Milicic, Biljana
    Moufti, Adel M.
    Misic, Tijana
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2015, 199 : 85 - 91