Mastectomy Skin Necrosis After Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Analysis Between Autologous Reconstruction and Implant-Based Reconstruction

被引:11
|
作者
Sue, Gloria R. [1 ]
Lee, Gordon K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Hlth Care, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
breast implant; breast reconstruction; free flap; mastectomy skin necrosis; outcomes; SPARING MASTECTOMY; FLAP NECROSIS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000001379
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mastectomy skin necrosis is a significant problem after breast reconstruction. We sought to perform a comparative analysis on this complication between patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction and patients undergoing 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction or 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction by the senior author from 2006 through 2015. Patient demographic factors including age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of smoking, and history of radiation to the breast were collected. Our primary outcome measure was mastectomy skin necrosis. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis between the 2 patient cohorts. The treatment patterns of mastectomy skin necrosis were then analyzed. Results: We identified 204 patientswho underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 293 patients who underwent 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction. Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction were older, heavier, more likely to have diabetes, and more likely to have had prior radiation to the breast compared with patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. The incidence of mastectomy skin necrosis was 30.4% of patients in the autologous group compared with only 10.6% of patients in the tissue expander group (P < 0.001). The treatment of this complication differed between these 2 patient groups. In general, those with autologous reconstructions were treated with more conservative means. Although 37.1% of patients were treated successfully with local wound care in the autologous group, only 3.2% were treated with local wound care in the tissue expander group (P < 0.001). Less than half (29.0%) of patients in the autologous group were treated with an operative intervention for this complication compared with 41.9% in the implant-based group (P = 0.25). Conclusions: Mastectomy skin necrosis is significantlymore likely to occur after autologous breast reconstruction compared with 2-stage expander implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients with autologous reconstructions are more readily treated with local wound care compared with patients with tissue expanders, who tended to require operative treatment of this complication. Patients considering breast reconstruction should be counseled appropriately regarding the differences in incidence and management of mastectomy skin necrosis between the reconstructive options.
引用
收藏
页码:S285 / S287
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Momeni, Arash
    Kanchwala, Suhail
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (05) : 1109 - 1115
  • [42] Immediate Nipple Reconstruction During Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Hong, Ki Yong
    Kim, Young-Eun
    Minn, Kyung Won
    Jin, Ung Sik
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 41 (04) : 793 - 799
  • [43] Immediate Nipple Reconstruction During Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Ki Yong Hong
    Young-Eun Kim
    Kyung Won Minn
    Ung Sik Jin
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 793 - 799
  • [44] Composite breast reconstruction: Implant-based breast reconstruction with adjunctive lipofilling
    Sommeling, C. E.
    Van Landuyt, K.
    Depypere, H.
    Van den Broecke, R.
    Monstrey, S.
    Blondeel, P. N.
    Morrison, W. A.
    Stillaert, F. B.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (08): : 1051 - 1058
  • [45] Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft
    Zienowicz, Richard J.
    Karacaoglu, Ercan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (02) : 373 - 381
  • [46] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Fabbri, Mariachiara
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Adesi, Liliana Barone
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 44 (05) : 503 - 515
  • [47] ASO Author Reflections: Immediate Implant-Based Versus Autologous-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Esparham, Ali
    Shoar, Saeed
    Whittington, Jennifer
    Shafaee, Zahra
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (03) : 2108 - 2109
  • [48] Modern Risks for Capsular Contracture After Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction
    Hammond, J. B.
    Kosiorek, H.
    Gray, R.
    Cronin, P.
    Rebecca, A.
    Casey, W.
    Vargas, C. E.
    Wong, W.
    Keole, S. R.
    Vern-Gross, T.
    Mcgee, L.
    Halyard, M.
    Pockaj, B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S78 - S78
  • [49] Discussion: Nitroglycerin Ointment for Reducing the Rate of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Luce, Edward A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (03) : 271E - 272E
  • [50] Effects of Prostaglandin E1 on Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Hwang, Ji Won
    Lim, Woo Sung
    Kim, Hyun Goo
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Bae, Juyoung
    Park, Seyeon
    Jeon, Byung-Joon
    Woo, Kyong-Je
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (02) : 278 - 286