Mastectomy Skin Necrosis After Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Analysis Between Autologous Reconstruction and Implant-Based Reconstruction

被引:11
|
作者
Sue, Gloria R. [1 ]
Lee, Gordon K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Hlth Care, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
breast implant; breast reconstruction; free flap; mastectomy skin necrosis; outcomes; SPARING MASTECTOMY; FLAP NECROSIS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; IMMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000001379
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mastectomy skin necrosis is a significant problem after breast reconstruction. We sought to perform a comparative analysis on this complication between patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction and patients undergoing 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction or 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction by the senior author from 2006 through 2015. Patient demographic factors including age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of smoking, and history of radiation to the breast were collected. Our primary outcome measure was mastectomy skin necrosis. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis between the 2 patient cohorts. The treatment patterns of mastectomy skin necrosis were then analyzed. Results: We identified 204 patientswho underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 293 patients who underwent 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction. Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction were older, heavier, more likely to have diabetes, and more likely to have had prior radiation to the breast compared with patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction. The incidence of mastectomy skin necrosis was 30.4% of patients in the autologous group compared with only 10.6% of patients in the tissue expander group (P < 0.001). The treatment of this complication differed between these 2 patient groups. In general, those with autologous reconstructions were treated with more conservative means. Although 37.1% of patients were treated successfully with local wound care in the autologous group, only 3.2% were treated with local wound care in the tissue expander group (P < 0.001). Less than half (29.0%) of patients in the autologous group were treated with an operative intervention for this complication compared with 41.9% in the implant-based group (P = 0.25). Conclusions: Mastectomy skin necrosis is significantlymore likely to occur after autologous breast reconstruction compared with 2-stage expander implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients with autologous reconstructions are more readily treated with local wound care compared with patients with tissue expanders, who tended to require operative treatment of this complication. Patients considering breast reconstruction should be counseled appropriately regarding the differences in incidence and management of mastectomy skin necrosis between the reconstructive options.
引用
收藏
页码:S285 / S287
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nitroglycerin Ointment for Reducing the Rate of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Turin, Sergey Y.
    Li, Daniel D.
    Vaca, Elbert E.
    Fine, Neil
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (03) : 264E - 270E
  • [32] A Comparative Study of Breast Sensibility and Patient Satisfaction After Breast Reconstruction Autologous, 2-Stage Implant-Based, and Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction
    Hwang, Yong-Jae
    Lee, Hyung-Chul
    Park, Seung-Ha
    Yoon, Eul-Sik
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (03) : 262 - 270
  • [33] Areolar reconstruction: MICAP flap as a skin paddle donor site in skin sparing mastectomy and implant-based reconstruction
    Bonomi, Riccardo
    Rapisarda, I. Fabio
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL CASE REPORTS, 2024, 2024 (01):
  • [34] Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Plachinski, Sarah J.
    Boehm, Lucas M.
    Adamson, Karri A.
    LoGiudice, John A.
    Doren, Erin L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (07) : E3709
  • [35] Pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a narrative review
    Di Micco, Rosa
    Santurro, Letizia
    Lapiana, Gaetano
    Socci, Davide
    Zuber, Veronica
    Cisternino, Giovanni
    Baleri, Sara
    Rottino, Stefano
    Ceccarino, Raffaele
    Gentilini, Oreste Davide
    ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2023, 7
  • [36] Clinical Analysis of Autologous Fat Grafting in DIEP and Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Dayicioglu, Deniz
    Canvasser, Leah
    Khakpour, Nazanin
    Lee, Timothy
    Mooney, Blaise
    Saglam, Ozlen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S659 - S659
  • [37] A Multimetric Health Literacy Analysis of Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Chen, Daniel H.
    Johnson, Anna Rose
    Ayyala, Haripriya
    Lee, Edward S.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Tran, Bao Ngoc N.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 : S102 - S108
  • [38] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach That Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Ad-El, Dean D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (02) : 318E - 318E
  • [39] Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after J-Pattern Skin-Reducing Mastectomy
    Caputo, Glenda Giorgia
    Pisano, Gaetano
    Albanese, Roberta
    Mura, Sebastiano
    Scarabosio, Anna
    Negrini, Filippo Contessi
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (02) : 233e - 236e
  • [40] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Li, Shangshan
    Luan, Jie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (03) : 508E - 509E