Identifying the Major Construction Wastes in the Building Construction Phase Based on Life Cycle Assessments

被引:18
|
作者
Park, Won-Jun [1 ]
Kim, Rakhyun [2 ]
Roh, Seungjun [3 ]
Ban, Hoki [4 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Samcheok 25913, South Korea
[2] GREENers, Ansan 15455, South Korea
[3] Kumoh Natl Inst Technol, Sch Architecture, Gumi 39177, South Korea
[4] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Samcheok 25913, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
major construction wastes; life cycle assessment; construction phase; OZONE CREATION POTENTIALS; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; ASSESSMENT LCA; SECTOR;
D O I
10.3390/su12198096
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to identify the major wastes generated during the construction phase using a life cycle assessment. To accomplish this, the amount of waste generated in the construction phase was deduced using the loss rate and weight conversions. Major construction wastes were assessed using six comprehensive environmental impact categories, including global warming potential, abiotic depletion potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, ozone depletion potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential. According to the analysis results, five main construction wastes-concrete, rebar, cement, polystyrene panel, and concrete block-comprehensively satisfied the 95% cutoff criteria for all six environmental impact categories. The results of the environmental impact characterization assessment revealed that concrete, concrete block, and cement waste accounted for over 70% of the contribution level in all the environmental impact categories except resource depletion. Insulation materials accounted for 1% of the total waste generated but were identified by the environmental impact assessment to have the highest contribution level.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of building shape on a residential building's construction, energy and life cycle costs
    Bostancioglu, E.
    ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 53 (04) : 441 - 467
  • [22] Energy Life Cycle in Extraterrestrial Construction Projects: Is Building Underground an Option?
    Moud, Hashem Izadi
    Rahgozar, Peyman
    Weber, Sebastian T.
    Capano, Craig
    Flood, Ian
    EARTH AND SPACE 2021: SPACE EXPLORATION, UTILIZATION, ENGINEERING, AND CONSTRUCTION IN EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, : 1166 - 1176
  • [23] LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OF A WOOD-BASED BUILDING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT
    Mitterpach, Jozef
    Ileckova, Rozalia
    Stefko, Jozef
    ACTA FACULTATIS XYLOLOGIAE ZVOLEN, 2018, 60 (01): : 147 - 157
  • [24] The Identification of Waste Construction at Construction Project Life Cycle
    Wibowo, Mochammad Agung
    Handayani, Naniek Utami
    Nurdiana, Asri
    Sholeh, Moh Nur
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (03) : 2633 - 2635
  • [26] Endless extension of life cycle of construction and demolition wastes as the most efficient environmental technology
    Mymrin, Vsevolod
    Waltrick, Carlos E.
    Alekseev, Kirill
    Avanci, Monica A.
    Rolim, Paulo H. B.
    Carvalho, Karina Q.
    Catal, Rodrigo E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2021, 24
  • [27] Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes
    Bovea, M. D.
    Powell, J. C.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 50 : 151 - 172
  • [28] A life cycle based environmental impacts assessment of construction materials used in road construction
    Chowdhury, Raja
    Apul, Defne
    Fry, Tim
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2010, 54 (04) : 250 - 255
  • [29] Management of construction and demolition wastes as secondary building resources
    Manukhina, Lyubov
    Ivanova, Irina
    ENERGY MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND TRANSPORT (EMMFT 2017), 2017, 90
  • [30] Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability Certification - Building Blocks for a sustainable Construction Industry
    Ciupack, Yvonne
    BAUTECHNIK, 2025, 102 (01) : 1 - 1