Energy Life Cycle in Extraterrestrial Construction Projects: Is Building Underground an Option?

被引:0
|
作者
Moud, Hashem Izadi [1 ]
Rahgozar, Peyman [2 ]
Weber, Sebastian T. [3 ]
Capano, Craig [1 ]
Flood, Ian [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida Gulf Coast Univ, Construct Management Dept, UA Whitaker Coll Engn, Ft Myers, FL 33965 USA
[2] Univ Florida, ME Rinker Sr Sch Construct Management, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Florida Gulf Coast Univ, UA Whitaker Coll Engn, Ft Myers, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, ME Rinker Sr Sch Construct Management, Res & Grad Educ, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Making life multi-planetary requires substantial knowledge of building structures in extraterrestrial bodies, where natural resources are scarce, human resources are expensive-to-utilize, and energy sources are vastly different from the Earth. On Earth, fossil fuels have been the main source of energy for construction projects. In other extraterrestrial bodies, including Mars and Moon, easy-to-access fossil fuels are non-existent. Solar energy is, and probably will be, the primary source of energy accessible to extraterrestrial construction projects. This calls for ultra-efficient and sustainable design of structures and buildings, smart and resource-efficient planning of projects, and use of energy-efficient and smart construction techniques and machinery. This paper presents two energy cycle flowcharts for construction projects on Earth and beyond, which show the vastly different energy cycles in these environments. It further presents arguments about the expensive and unrealistic nature of building underground, as one of the key ideas for building beyond Earth.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1176
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Expanding uses of building information modeling in life-cycle construction projects
    Hannele, Kerosuo
    Reijo, Miettinen
    Tarja, Maki
    Sami, Paavola
    Jenni, Korpela
    Teija, Rantala
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 114 - 119
  • [2] Risk and life cycle costs and benefits for underground projects
    Parker, Harvey W.
    Reilly, John
    NORTH AMERICAN TUNNELING 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 526 - +
  • [3] Benefits and life-cycle costs of underground projects
    Reilly, John
    Parker, Harvey
    UNDERGROUND SPACE - THE 4TH DIMENSION OF METROPOLISES, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 679 - 684
  • [4] The Evaluation of Historic Building Energy Retrofit Projects through the Life Cycle Assessment
    Angrisano, Mariarosaria
    Fabbrocino, Francesco
    Iodice, Paola
    Girard, Luigi Fusco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (15):
  • [5] Combining Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessments in Building Energy Renovation Projects
    Moschetti, Roberta
    Brattebo, Helge
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [6] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: An Index System for Building Energy Retrofit Projects
    Song, Pei
    Wu, Lingyu
    Zhao, Wenbo
    Ma, Wenting
    Hao, Jianli
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [7] Effect of building shape on a residential building's construction, energy and life cycle costs
    Bostancioglu, E.
    ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 53 (04) : 441 - 467
  • [8] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    WUBBENHORST, KL
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1986, 19 (04) : 87 - 97
  • [9] IMPORTANCE OF LIFE CYCLE COSTING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    Schneiderova-Heralova, Renata
    17TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 1223 - 1227
  • [10] A comprehensive framework for assessing the life-cycle energy of building construction assemblies
    Crawford, Robert H.
    Czerniakowski, Isabella
    Fuller, Robert J.
    ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2010, 53 (03) : 288 - 296