Energy Life Cycle in Extraterrestrial Construction Projects: Is Building Underground an Option?

被引:0
|
作者
Moud, Hashem Izadi [1 ]
Rahgozar, Peyman [2 ]
Weber, Sebastian T. [3 ]
Capano, Craig [1 ]
Flood, Ian [4 ]
机构
[1] Florida Gulf Coast Univ, Construct Management Dept, UA Whitaker Coll Engn, Ft Myers, FL 33965 USA
[2] Univ Florida, ME Rinker Sr Sch Construct Management, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Florida Gulf Coast Univ, UA Whitaker Coll Engn, Ft Myers, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, ME Rinker Sr Sch Construct Management, Res & Grad Educ, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Making life multi-planetary requires substantial knowledge of building structures in extraterrestrial bodies, where natural resources are scarce, human resources are expensive-to-utilize, and energy sources are vastly different from the Earth. On Earth, fossil fuels have been the main source of energy for construction projects. In other extraterrestrial bodies, including Mars and Moon, easy-to-access fossil fuels are non-existent. Solar energy is, and probably will be, the primary source of energy accessible to extraterrestrial construction projects. This calls for ultra-efficient and sustainable design of structures and buildings, smart and resource-efficient planning of projects, and use of energy-efficient and smart construction techniques and machinery. This paper presents two energy cycle flowcharts for construction projects on Earth and beyond, which show the vastly different energy cycles in these environments. It further presents arguments about the expensive and unrealistic nature of building underground, as one of the key ideas for building beyond Earth.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1176
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of the Challenges of Life Cycle Costing in Green Construction Projects in Malaysia
    Maisham, Mysarah
    Adnan, Hamimah
    Ismail, Noor Akmal Adillah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (05): : 116 - 124
  • [42] The effect of building and material service life on the life cycle embodied energy of an apartment building
    Rauf, Abdul
    Crawford, Robert H.
    LIVING AND LEARNING: RESEARCH FOR A BETTER BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2015, : 413 - 422
  • [43] THE LIFE CYCLE OF PROJECTS
    Huidan, Livia
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ABOUT FORMING AND DESIGN IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, : 207 - 210
  • [44] Review of Life-Cycle Assessment Applications in Building Construction
    Singh, Amanjeet
    Berghorn, George
    Joshi, Satish
    Syal, Matt
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 17 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment of Different Prefabricated Rates for Building Construction
    Wang, Shaozhe
    Sinha, Rajib
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [46] Timber Construction: Construction - Building Physics - Projects
    Lueckmann, Rudolf
    BAUTECHNIK, 2022, 99 (08) : 614 - 614
  • [47] Current scientific principles for underground construction projects
    Zertsalov M.G.
    Yufin S.A.
    Hydrotechnical Construction, 2000, 34 (11) : 563 - 568
  • [48] Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects
    Choi, HH
    Cho, HN
    Seo, JW
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 130 (02) : 258 - 272
  • [49] Benefits of underground construction on two sewer projects
    Day, DA
    Marsh, HL
    Kwiatkowski, TP
    NORTH AMERICAN TUNNELING 2000: UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION: THE REVOLUTION CONTINUES, 2000, : 225 - 235
  • [50] A New Information System for Underground Construction Projects
    Chmelina, Klaus
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN GEO-ENGINEERING, 2010, : 329 - 337