Comparison of computerized image analyses for digitized screen-film mammograms and full-field digital mammography images

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Hui [1 ]
Giger, Maryellen L.
Yuan, Yading
Lan, Li
Suzuki, Kenji
Jamieson, Andrew
Yarusso, Laura
Nishikawa, Robert M.
Sennett, Charlene
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Comm Med Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
DIGITAL MAMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS | 2006年 / 4046卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We have developed computerized methods for the analysis of mammo-graphic lesions in order to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Our automatic methods include the extraction of the lesion from the breast parenchyma, the characterization of the lesion features in terms of mathematical descriptors, and the merging of these lesion features into an estimate of the probability of malignancy. Our initial development was performed on digitized screen film mammograms. We report our progress here in converting our methods for use with images from full-field digital mammography (FFDM). It is apparent from our initial comparisons on CAD for SFMD and FFDM that the overall concepts and image analysis techniques are similar, however reoptimization for a particular lesion segmentation or a particular mammographic imaging system are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 575
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Studies Comparing Screen-Film Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Updated Review
    Skaane, P.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [32] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Per Skaane
    Felix Diekmann
    Corinne Balleyguier
    Susanne Diekmann
    Jean-Charles Piguet
    Kari Young
    Michael Abdelnoor
    Loren Niklason
    European Radiology, 2008, 18
  • [33] Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
    Skaane, Per
    Diekmann, Felix
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Diekmann, Susanne
    Piguet, Jean-Charles
    Young, Kari
    Abdelnoor, Michael
    Niklason, Loren
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) : 1134 - 1143
  • [34] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY VERSUS SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING
    Hipolito, C.
    Gallegos, V
    Hernandez, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [35] Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography using soft-copy reading
    Skaane, A
    Young, K
    Egge, ES
    Scheel, B
    Sovik, E
    Skjennald, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 284
  • [36] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [37] Comparison of interpretation times for screening exams between soft copy full-field digital mammography and hard copy screen-film mammography
    Solari, M
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Wolfman, JA
    Willis, W
    Segal, L
    DeLeon, P
    Benjamin, S
    Reddy, D
    Mendelson, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 11 - 11
  • [38] Comparison of signal-to-noise ratio measurements for a full-field digital mammography system and a mammographic screen-film system
    Yarusso, LM
    Castro, IM
    Nishikawa, RM
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 367 - 368
  • [39] Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens
    Kuzmiak, CM
    Millnamow, GA
    Qaqish, B
    Pisano, ED
    Cole, EB
    Brown, ME
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (12) : 1378 - 1382
  • [40] Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography
    Glueck, Deborah H.
    Lamb, Molly M.
    Lewin, John M.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 670 - 676