Comparison of computerized image analyses for digitized screen-film mammograms and full-field digital mammography images

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Hui [1 ]
Giger, Maryellen L.
Yuan, Yading
Lan, Li
Suzuki, Kenji
Jamieson, Andrew
Yarusso, Laura
Nishikawa, Robert M.
Sennett, Charlene
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Comm Med Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
DIGITAL MAMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS | 2006年 / 4046卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We have developed computerized methods for the analysis of mammo-graphic lesions in order to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Our automatic methods include the extraction of the lesion from the breast parenchyma, the characterization of the lesion features in terms of mathematical descriptors, and the merging of these lesion features into an estimate of the probability of malignancy. Our initial development was performed on digitized screen film mammograms. We report our progress here in converting our methods for use with images from full-field digital mammography (FFDM). It is apparent from our initial comparisons on CAD for SFMD and FFDM that the overall concepts and image analysis techniques are similar, however reoptimization for a particular lesion segmentation or a particular mammographic imaging system are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 575
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography
    U. Fischer
    F. Baum
    S. Obenauer
    S. Luftner-Nagel
    D. von Heyden
    R. Vosshenrich
    E. Grabbe
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2679 - 2683
  • [22] Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography in comparison with screen film mammography by hard copy images
    Uchiyama, N
    Tajima, H
    Machida, M
    Takahama, K
    Kumazaki, T
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 191 - 191
  • [23] Comparison of the microcalcifications between full-field digital mammography and screen film mammography
    Tohno, E
    Kujiraoka, Y
    Watanabe, Y
    Itai, Y
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 189 - 189
  • [24] Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography:: image quality and lesion detection
    Fischmann, A
    Siegmann, KC
    Wersebe, A
    Claussen, CD
    Müller-Schimpfle, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (928): : 312 - 315
  • [25] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    di Maggio, Cosimo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (11) : 2559 - 2566
  • [26] Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography
    Gisella Gennaro
    Cosimo di Maggio
    European Radiology, 2006, 16 : 2559 - 2566
  • [27] SCREEN-FILM VERSUS FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY: RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN A LARGE TEACHING HOSPITAL
    Stantic, Tomislav J.
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera E.
    Stojanovic, Saida S.
    Basta-Nikolic, Marijana D.
    Arandjic, Danijela D.
    Stoiljkovic, Dragana S.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2013, 28 (04): : 398 - 405
  • [28] Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations
    Lewin, JM
    Hendrick, RE
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Moss, LJ
    Karellas, A
    Sisney, GA
    Kuni, CC
    Cutter, GR
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 873 - 880
  • [29] Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms
    Kuzmiak, CM
    Pisano, ED
    Cole, EB
    Zeng, DL
    Burns, CB
    Roberto, C
    Pavic, D
    Lee, Y
    Seo, BK
    Koomen, M
    Washburn, D
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (10) : 3144 - 3150
  • [30] Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
    Del Turco, Marco Rosselli
    Mantellini, Paola
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Bonardi, Rita
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Lazzari, Barbara
    Houssami, Nehmat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) : 860 - 866