Task-dependent impedance and implications for upper-limb prosthesis control

被引:20
|
作者
Blank, Amy A. [1 ]
Okamura, Allison M. [2 ]
Whitcomb, Louis L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, 112 Hackerman Hall,3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
User-selectable impedance; prosthetic arms; variable impedance control; CYBERNETIC ELBOW PROSTHESES; CONTROL BALANCES STABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; ADAPTIVE-CONTROL; CONTROL-SYSTEMS; STIFFNESS; DYNAMICS; MANIPULATORS; MOVEMENTS; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.1177/0278364913517728
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modern-day prosthetic limbs are currently unable to imitate the versatile interaction behaviors of real human arms. Although humans can vary the impedance of their arms, commercially available prosthetic limbs have impedance properties that cannot be directly controlled by users. We investigate the hypothesis that user-selectable prosthesis impedance properties could improve the user's ability to interact effectively with a variety of environments. We report the results of a series of human subject studies exploring this hypothesis using either a virtual prosthesis or a robot arm as a prosthesis proxy. We observed human performance with different stiffness and damping levels in the prosthesis proxy in two one-degree-of-freedom tasks: (1) a force minimization task and (2) a trajectory tracking task. The virtual prosthesis studies focus on human performance in an ideal simulated system to avoid limitations of a physical implementation, whereas the robot arm study focuses on performance changes that result from limitations of physical robotic hardware. The virtual prosthesis results showed that task-dependent impedance can improve user performance and that users can evaluate the effects of changing impedance. The robot arm results showed similar performance benefits of task-dependent impedance in a physical robotic system. These studies identified areas in which non-ideal characteristics of the physical system limited users' performance; most notably, the physical system could not achieve the low damping levels that helped subjects reduce contact forces in the virtual prosthesis studies. Thus, we identify some design considerations for prostheses with user-selectable impedance that can achieve useful impedance ranges for improving user performance.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 846
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A biomechatronics-based EPP topology for upper-limb prosthesis control: Modeling & benchtop prototype
    Mablekos-Alexiou, Anestis
    Kontogiannopoulos, Spiros
    Bertos, Georgios A.
    Papadopoulos, Evangelos
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2022, 73
  • [32] CONTROL OF UPPER-LIMB PROSTHESES - CASE FOR NEUROELECTRIC CONTROL
    DE LUCA, CJ
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1978, 2 (02) : 57 - 61
  • [33] Prosthesis Control System of the Upper Limb
    Tomashevich, Daniil
    Bobrova, Yulia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONFERENCE OF OPEN INNOVATIONS ASSOCIATION (FRUCT 2017), 2017, : 460 - 465
  • [34] MODELING THE CONTROL OF UPPER-LIMB MOVEMENT - PREFACE
    FLASH, T
    WING, A
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1993, 25 (03) : 130 - 130
  • [35] Timing and the Control of Rhythmic Upper-Limb Movements
    Shafir, Tal
    Brown, Susan H.
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2010, 42 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [36] Study of Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Control for Spacesuit
    Zhang, Pei
    Wang, Rui
    Liu, Xin
    Wei, Qingqing
    Zeng, Lei
    Wang, Wei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE 4TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2018), 2018, : 1868 - 1872
  • [37] A Review on Upper-Limb Myoelectric Prosthetic Control
    Iqbal, Nisheena V.
    Subramaniam, Kamalraj
    Asmi, Shaniba P.
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2018, 64 (06) : 740 - 752
  • [38] A Prototype of a Myoelectric Upper-Limb Prosthesis Constructed Using Additive Technologies
    N. N. Unanyan
    A. A. Belov
    Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 55 : 303 - 307
  • [39] Force myography controlled multifunctional hand prosthesis for upper-limb amputees
    Prakash, Alok
    Sahi, Ajay Kumar
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Sharma, Shiru
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2020, 62
  • [40] Analysis of Man-Machine Interfaces in Upper-Limb Prosthesis: A Review
    Ribeiro, Jose
    Mota, Francisco
    Cavalcante, Tarique
    Nogueira, Ingrid
    Gondim, Victor
    Albuquerque, Victor
    Alexandria, Auzuir
    ROBOTICS, 2019, 8 (01):