Task-dependent impedance and implications for upper-limb prosthesis control

被引:20
|
作者
Blank, Amy A. [1 ]
Okamura, Allison M. [2 ]
Whitcomb, Louis L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, 112 Hackerman Hall,3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
User-selectable impedance; prosthetic arms; variable impedance control; CYBERNETIC ELBOW PROSTHESES; CONTROL BALANCES STABILITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; ADAPTIVE-CONTROL; CONTROL-SYSTEMS; STIFFNESS; DYNAMICS; MANIPULATORS; MOVEMENTS; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.1177/0278364913517728
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modern-day prosthetic limbs are currently unable to imitate the versatile interaction behaviors of real human arms. Although humans can vary the impedance of their arms, commercially available prosthetic limbs have impedance properties that cannot be directly controlled by users. We investigate the hypothesis that user-selectable prosthesis impedance properties could improve the user's ability to interact effectively with a variety of environments. We report the results of a series of human subject studies exploring this hypothesis using either a virtual prosthesis or a robot arm as a prosthesis proxy. We observed human performance with different stiffness and damping levels in the prosthesis proxy in two one-degree-of-freedom tasks: (1) a force minimization task and (2) a trajectory tracking task. The virtual prosthesis studies focus on human performance in an ideal simulated system to avoid limitations of a physical implementation, whereas the robot arm study focuses on performance changes that result from limitations of physical robotic hardware. The virtual prosthesis results showed that task-dependent impedance can improve user performance and that users can evaluate the effects of changing impedance. The robot arm results showed similar performance benefits of task-dependent impedance in a physical robotic system. These studies identified areas in which non-ideal characteristics of the physical system limited users' performance; most notably, the physical system could not achieve the low damping levels that helped subjects reduce contact forces in the virtual prosthesis studies. Thus, we identify some design considerations for prostheses with user-selectable impedance that can achieve useful impedance ranges for improving user performance.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 846
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Control strategy for upper-limb prostheses
    Childress, DS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 20, PTS 1-6: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TOWARDS THE YEAR 2000 AND BEYOND, 1998, 20 : 2273 - 2275
  • [22] Research Progress of Sensory Feedback for Intelligent Upper-limb Prosthesis
    Hu Y.
    Jiang L.
    Yang B.
    Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59 (05): : 1 - 10
  • [23] The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis
    Bouwsema, Hanneke
    van der Sluis, Corry K.
    Bongers, Raoul M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (09): : 1759 - 1764
  • [24] Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation
    Raichle, Katherine A.
    Hanley, Marisol A.
    Molton, Ivan
    Kadel, Nancy J.
    Campbell, Kellye
    Phelps, Emily
    Ehde, Dawn
    Smith, Douglas G.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 45 (07): : 961 - 972
  • [25] A Robotic Prosthesis as a Functional Upper-Limb Aid: An Innovative Review
    Huamanchahua, Deyby
    Rosales-Gurmendi, Diana
    Taza-Aquino, Yerson
    Valverde-Alania, Dalma
    Cama-Iriarte, Miguel
    Vargas-Martinez, Adriana
    Ramirez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL IOT, ELECTRONICS AND MECHATRONICS CONFERENCE (IEMTRONICS), 2021, : 918 - 925
  • [26] A "Biomechatronic EPP" Upper-Limb Prosthesis Control Configuration and Its Performance Comparison to Other Control Configurations
    Kontogiannopoulos, Spiros
    Bertos, Georgios A.
    Papadopoulos, Evangelos
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2020, 2 (02): : 282 - 291
  • [27] Cognitive Workload in Conventional Direct Control vs. Pattern Recognition Control of an Upper-limb Prosthesis
    Zhang, Wenjuan
    White, Melissa
    Zahabi, Maryam
    Winslow, Anna T.
    Zhang, Fan
    Huang, He
    Kaber, David
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2016, : 2335 - 2340
  • [28] Real-Time EMG Signal Processing with Implementation of PID Control for Upper-Limb Prosthesis
    Sattar, Neelum Yousaf
    Syed, Usama A.
    Muhammad, Shaheer
    Kausar, Zareena
    2019 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2019, : 120 - 125
  • [29] Human Machine Interfaces in Upper-Limb Prosthesis Control: A Survey of Techniques for Preprocessing and Processing of Biosignals
    Ahmadizadeh, Chakaveh
    Khoshnam, Mahta
    Menon, Carlo
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2021, 38 (04) : 12 - 22
  • [30] A Novel Respiratory Control and Actuation System for Upper-Limb Prosthesis Users: Clinical Evaluation Study
    Nagaraja, Vikranth H.
    Moulic, Soikat Ghosh
    D'souza, Jennifer V.
    Limesh, M.
    Walters, Peter
    Bergmann, Jeroen H. M.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 128764 - 128778