Thermo-economic performance analyses and comparison of two turbine layouts for organic Rankine cycles with dual-pressure evaporation

被引:45
|
作者
Li, Jian [1 ]
Ge, Zhong [1 ]
Liu, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Duan, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Yang, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn MOE, Beijing Key Lab Utilizat & Reduct Technol CO2, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Beijing Key Lab Proc Fluid Filtrat & Separat, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Organic Rankine cycle; Multi-pressure evaporation; Turbine; Expansion process; Thermo-economic performance; Performance comparison; LOW-GRADE HEAT; WASTE HEAT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; WORKING FLUIDS; EXERGY; CONVERSION; DESIGN; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.029
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multi-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle involves two or more evaporation processes with different pressures. Compared to the conventional single-pressure evaporation type, the multi-pressure evaporation type can significantly reduce the exergy loss in the endothermic process, and its widely used in the heat-work conversion of low and medium temperature (< 350 degrees C) thermal energy is promising. The turbine layout of the multi-pressure evaporation type has two typical forms: the separate turbine layout and induction turbine layout. Turbines in two layouts may exhibit considerable differences in the geometric and operating parameters. Selecting a suitable turbine layout is crucial to improve the system thermo-economic performance. While, the thermo-economic performance variations and comparison of two turbine layouts remain indeterminate for various operating conditions. This study was based on the one-dimensional efficiency model and purchased equipment cost model of the radial-flow turbine. The thermo-economic performance of two turbine layouts was analyzed and compared for nine pure organic fluids. Effects of two-stage evaporation pressures on the thermo-economic performance of two turbine layouts were also studied. Results show that the total power output of the induction turbine layout can increase by 0.3-5.4%, and its specific investment cost is lower for most of operating conditions and the maximum decrement is 34.2%, compared to the separate turbine layout. The decrement in the specific investment cost decreases as the high-stage evaporation pressure increases, and it generally increases as the low-stage evaporation pressure increases. Moreover, the total power output is larger, the thermo-economic advantage of the induction turbine layout is generally greater.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 614
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Exergy Analysis of Series and Parallel Dual-Pressure Auto-Cascade Organic Rankine Cycles
    Li, Yongsheng
    Li, Zhiyu
    Zhang, Haigang
    Zhang, Jieyu
    He, Xiaohong
    Qiao, Yanjin
    Yu, Zeting
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (12)
  • [32] Thermodynamic and Techno-economic Analysis of a Triple-pressure Organic Rankine Cycle: Comparison with Dual-pressure and Single-pressure ORCs
    YU Hao
    LU Xinli
    ZHANG Wei
    ZHANG Jiaqi
    Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 2021, (06) : 1857 - 1869
  • [33] Thermodynamic and Techno-economic Analysis of a Triple-pressure Organic Rankine Cycle: Comparison with Dual-pressure and Single-pressure ORCs
    YU Hao
    LU Xinli
    ZHANG Wei
    ZHANG Jiaqi
    ActaGeologicaSinica(EnglishEdition), 2021, 95 (06) : 1857 - 1869
  • [34] Thermo-economic comparison of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on different heat exchanger configurations
    Zhang, Cheng
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Shukun
    Xu, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Qibin
    ENERGY, 2017, 123 : 728 - 741
  • [35] Thermodynamic and Techno-economic Analysis of a Triple-pressure Organic Rankine Cycle: Comparison with Dual-pressure and Single-pressure ORCs
    Yu Hao
    Lu Xinli
    Zhang Wei
    Zhang Jiaqi
    ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA-ENGLISH EDITION, 2021, 95 (06) : 1857 - 1869
  • [36] Thermo-Economic Performance Analysis of a Regenerative Superheating Organic Rankine Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery
    Han, Zhonghe
    Li, Peng
    Han, Xu
    Mei, Zhongkai
    Wang, Zhi
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (10):
  • [37] Thermo-Economic Analysis of Zeotropic Mixtures and Pure Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery
    Heberle, Florian
    Brueggemann, Dieter
    ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [38] Thermo-economic assessment of an externally fired hybrid CSP/biomass gas turbine and organic Rankine combined cycle
    Pantaleo, Antonio M.
    Camporeale, Sergio M.
    Miliozzi, Adio
    Russo, Valeria
    Mugnozza, Giacomo Scarascia
    Markides, Christos N.
    Shah, Nilay
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105 : 174 - 181
  • [39] OFF-DESIGN PERFORMANCE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN DUAL-PRESSURE ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES USING PURE AND MIXTURE WORKING FLUIDS
    Du, Yang
    Long, Ying
    Hao, Muting
    Huo, Yaowu
    Zhao, Pan
    Wang, Jiangfeng
    Dai, Yiping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [40] Thermo-economic analysis and comparison of a CO2 transcritical power cycle and an organic Rankine cycle
    Li, Maoqing
    Wang, Jiangfeng
    Li, Saili
    Wang, Xurong
    He, Weifeng
    Dai, Yiping
    GEOTHERMICS, 2014, 50 : 101 - 111