Clinical efficacy of Spasmofen® suppository in the emergency treatment of renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative trial

被引:7
|
作者
Yakoot, Mostafa [1 ]
Salem, Amel [2 ]
Yousef, Sameh [2 ]
Helmy, Sherine [3 ]
机构
[1] Green Clin & Res Ctr, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Helmy Med Ctr, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Pharco Corp, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2014年 / 8卷
关键词
renal colic; ketoprofen; hyoscine butylbromide; ketorolac; RCT; INTRAVENOUS KETOROLAC; DICLOFENAC SODIUM; INDOMETHACIN; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S62571
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: Renal colic is typically characterized by the sudden onset of severe pain radiating from the flank to the groin and its acute management in emergency departments essentially aims at rapid pain relief. Spasmofen (R) is a brand of Amriya Pharmaceutical Industries in the form of rectal suppositories containing ketoprofen 100 mg and hyoscine butylbromide 10 mg. This combination is intended for the rapid relief of severe colicky pain in the renal system, hepatobiliary system, or gastrointestinal tract. This trial aims to compare a single-dose of Spasmofen rectal suppository to a single intravenous (IV) ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg/2 mL dose in patients with acute renal colic. Methods: A total of 80 eligible consecutive patients presenting to the emergency departments of two medical centers with acute renal colic were included in the study. Eligible patients who signed the informed consent were randomly assigned into two treatment groups: an experimental group (Spasmofen group) who received one Spasmofen rectal suppository plus an IV injection of 2 mL of normal saline solution; and a control group (ketorolac group) who received one ketorolac 30 mg/2 mL ampoule IV plus one placebo suppository. Treatment success, defined as a change in the verbal rating score from severe or moderate pain to none or mild at 60 minutes after the dose, was compared between groups using the chi-square/Fisher's exact test. Percentage reductions in visual pain analog scale (VPAS) scores at 15 and 60 minutes after the dose were compared between groups using the Z-test for proportions. Results: Successful treatment at 60 minutes occurred in 35 of 40 (87.5%) of Spasmofen-treated patients and in 33 of 40 (82.5%) of ketorolac-treated patients. The difference was not statistically significant by Fisher's exact test (P=0.755). The mean percentage reduction of VPAS after 15 minutes was 61.82% in the Spasmofen-treated group and 64.76% in the ketorolac-treated group. The difference was also not statistically significant by the Z-test for proportions (P=0.795). Sixty minutes after being treated, Spasmofen was associated with a statistically significant greater reduction in VPAS (mean% reduction =92.36%) than ketorolac (75.06%; P=0.0466). Conclusion: Single-dose Spasmofen rectal suppository might be a safe and effective first-aid treatment for the emergency department relief of acute renal colic.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 410
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ORAL VISCOUS BUDESONIDE VERSUS SWALLOWED FLUTICASONE INHALER FOR INITIAL TREATMENT OF ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS WITH EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY CLINICAL TRIAL
    Dellon, Evan S.
    Woosley, John T.
    Arrington, Ashley
    McGee, Sarah J.
    Covington, Jacquelyn
    Moist, Susan E.
    Gebhart, Jessica H.
    Tylicki, Alexandrea E.
    Shoyoye, Shiyan O.
    Martin, Christopher
    Galanko, Joseph
    Baron, John A.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S72 - S73
  • [42] A Randomized Double-Dummy, Double Blind, Misoprostol Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate and Safety of Rebamipide in the Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Complication
    Jung, Jin Hwan
    Park, Soo-Heon
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S572 - S572
  • [43] SALMETEROL COMPARED WITH SLOW-RELEASE TERBUTALINE IN NOCTURNAL ASTHMA - A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY, SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIAL
    BRAMBILLA, C
    CHASTANG, C
    GEORGES, D
    BERTIN, L
    DESFOUGERES, JL
    ANTIPHON, P
    AUBIER, M
    BARBIER, R
    BELLVERT, P
    BLANCHON, F
    BONNAMOUR, C
    BOUTRY, D
    CABRERA, J
    CARLES, P
    CHAMAS, M
    CHARPIN, D
    CHAVAILLON, JM
    CLAVIER, J
    COSTE, E
    CROXO, C
    DELECLUSE, P
    DENNEWALD, G
    DERENNE, JP
    EPSTEIN, M
    FIAUD, JP
    GAILLARD, JR
    GAUCHER, L
    GREILLIER, P
    GRIGNET, JP
    GROSCLAUDE, M
    GRUNCHEC, N
    GUERIN, P
    GUILLAIS, P
    KRAI, D
    LAVANDIER, M
    LEBAS, FX
    LECOCGUIC, Y
    LEGENDRE, M
    LEGOFF, C
    LUGASSY, D
    MAFFRE, JP
    MARTIN, M
    MATHIEU, M
    MEEKEL, P
    MORALES, R
    MULLER, D
    PERRINFAYOLLE, M
    PRUDHOMME, A
    REMAN, A
    STERN, M
    ALLERGY, 1994, 49 (06) : 421 - 426
  • [44] Intravenous Paracetamol, Morphine, or Ketorolac for the Treatment of Renal Colic: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial
    Yazdani, Reza
    Saeedi, Morteza
    Amirshekari, Tahere
    Bordbar, Ghasem
    Tabibzadeh, Seyed Ashkan
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (01): : 169 - 173
  • [45] Aceclofenac–tizanidine in the treatment of acute low back pain: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentric, comparative study against aceclofenac alone
    Anil Pareek
    Nitin Chandurkar
    A. S. Chandanwale
    Ratnakar Ambade
    Anil Gupta
    Girish Bartakke
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 1836 - 1842
  • [46] Efficacy of intravenous citalopram compared with oral citalopram for severe depression - Safety and efficacy data from a double-blind, double-dummy trial
    Guelfi, JD
    Strub, N
    Loft, H
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 58 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [47] Oral Chinese herbal medicine for psoriasis vulgaris: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre clinical trial
    Deng, Jingwen
    Yao, Danni
    Lu, Chuanjian
    Wen, Zehuai
    Yan, Yuhong
    He, Ziyang
    Wu, Huimei
    Deng, Hao
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of patients with rosacea: A multicenter, randomized, double- blind, double-dummy, pilot study
    Wang, Ben
    Yuan, Xin
    Huang, Xin
    Tang, Yan
    Zhao, Zhixiang
    Yang, Bin
    Yang, Baoqi
    Zheng, Yue
    Yuan, Chao
    Xie, Hongfu
    Li, Ji
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 84 (02) : 543 - 545
  • [49] A Randomized Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter Trial of Azasetron versus Ondansetron to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Prevention of Delayed Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Chemotherapy
    Lee, Hee Yeon
    Kim, Hoon-Kyo
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Kim, Bong-Seog
    Song, Hong Suk
    Yang, Sung Hyun
    Kim, Joon Hee
    Kim, Yeul Hong
    Kim, Jong Gwang
    Kim, Sang-We
    Kim, Dong-Wan
    Kim, Si-Young
    Park, Hee Sook
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 46 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [50] Chinese herbal medicine bi min fang for allergic rhinitis: protocol for a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial
    Luo, Qiulan
    Zhou, Shiqing
    Li, Xiaoshan
    Chen, Qubo
    Lin, Wenmin
    Lu, Liming
    Li, Hua
    Chen, Caifeng
    Chen, Wenyong
    Li, Yunying
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (1)