Clinical efficacy of Spasmofen® suppository in the emergency treatment of renal colic: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative trial

被引:7
|
作者
Yakoot, Mostafa [1 ]
Salem, Amel [2 ]
Yousef, Sameh [2 ]
Helmy, Sherine [3 ]
机构
[1] Green Clin & Res Ctr, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Helmy Med Ctr, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Pharco Corp, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
关键词
renal colic; ketoprofen; hyoscine butylbromide; ketorolac; RCT; INTRAVENOUS KETOROLAC; DICLOFENAC SODIUM; INDOMETHACIN; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S62571
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: Renal colic is typically characterized by the sudden onset of severe pain radiating from the flank to the groin and its acute management in emergency departments essentially aims at rapid pain relief. Spasmofen (R) is a brand of Amriya Pharmaceutical Industries in the form of rectal suppositories containing ketoprofen 100 mg and hyoscine butylbromide 10 mg. This combination is intended for the rapid relief of severe colicky pain in the renal system, hepatobiliary system, or gastrointestinal tract. This trial aims to compare a single-dose of Spasmofen rectal suppository to a single intravenous (IV) ketorolac tromethamine 30 mg/2 mL dose in patients with acute renal colic. Methods: A total of 80 eligible consecutive patients presenting to the emergency departments of two medical centers with acute renal colic were included in the study. Eligible patients who signed the informed consent were randomly assigned into two treatment groups: an experimental group (Spasmofen group) who received one Spasmofen rectal suppository plus an IV injection of 2 mL of normal saline solution; and a control group (ketorolac group) who received one ketorolac 30 mg/2 mL ampoule IV plus one placebo suppository. Treatment success, defined as a change in the verbal rating score from severe or moderate pain to none or mild at 60 minutes after the dose, was compared between groups using the chi-square/Fisher's exact test. Percentage reductions in visual pain analog scale (VPAS) scores at 15 and 60 minutes after the dose were compared between groups using the Z-test for proportions. Results: Successful treatment at 60 minutes occurred in 35 of 40 (87.5%) of Spasmofen-treated patients and in 33 of 40 (82.5%) of ketorolac-treated patients. The difference was not statistically significant by Fisher's exact test (P=0.755). The mean percentage reduction of VPAS after 15 minutes was 61.82% in the Spasmofen-treated group and 64.76% in the ketorolac-treated group. The difference was also not statistically significant by the Z-test for proportions (P=0.795). Sixty minutes after being treated, Spasmofen was associated with a statistically significant greater reduction in VPAS (mean% reduction =92.36%) than ketorolac (75.06%; P=0.0466). Conclusion: Single-dose Spasmofen rectal suppository might be a safe and effective first-aid treatment for the emergency department relief of acute renal colic.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 410
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of the efficacy, tolerability, and smoothness indexes of two nifedipine formulations:: A randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, controlled trial
    de Roa, ER
    Octavio, A
    de Mayorca, E
    Castro, P
    Miranda, R
    Valecillo, E
    González, M
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2002, 63 (05): : 305 - 315
  • [12] Donepezil vs. propranolol for migraine prevention: Results of a randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial
    Klapper, J
    Mathew, NT
    Abu-Shakra, S
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (06) : A335 - A335
  • [13] Efficacy and Safety of Mulberry Twig Alkaloids Tablet for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, and Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial
    Qu, Ling
    Liang, Xiaochun
    Tian, Guoqing
    Zhang, Gaili
    Wu, Qunli
    Huang, Xiumei
    Cui, Yazhong
    Liu, Yuling
    Shen, Zhufang
    Xiao, Changqing
    Qin, Yingfen
    Miao, Heng
    Zhang, Yongyan
    Li, Ziling
    Ye, Shandong
    Zhang, Xuezhi
    Yang, Jing
    Cao, Guiwen
    Li, Yi
    Yang, Gangyi
    Hu, Ji
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    Li, Zhengfang
    Li, Yukun
    Zhang, Xiuzhen
    Zhang, Guangde
    Chen, Li
    Hua, Wenjin
    Yu, Ming
    Lu, Chunyan
    Zhang, Xiaomei
    Jiang, Hong
    DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 (06) : 1324 - 1333
  • [14] Raloxifene and Tibolone in Elderly Women: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Jacobsen, Didy E.
    Melis, Rene J. F.
    Verhaar, Harald J. J.
    Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 13 (02) : 189.e1 - 189.e7
  • [15] A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled dose comparison of thalidomide for treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum
    Villahermosa, LG
    Fajardo, TT
    Abalos, RM
    Balagon, MV
    Tan, EV
    Cellona, RV
    Palmer, JP
    Wittes, J
    Thomas, SD
    Kook, KA
    Walsh, GP
    Walsh, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2005, 72 (05): : 518 - 526
  • [16] BICITROPEPTIDE AND CIMETIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF DUODENAL-ULCERS - A DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY ENDOSCOPICALLY CONTROLLED TRIAL
    MOSHAL, MG
    SPITAELS, JM
    KHAN, F
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 58 (16): : 631 - 633
  • [17] Effects of venlafaxine and carbamazepine for painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled double-blind and double-dummy multicenter clinical trial
    Jia, H.
    li, Q.
    Song, D.
    An, Z.
    Liu, Y.
    Ran, X.
    Wu, R.
    Tian, H.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 : 119 - 120
  • [18] Rapid Recurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity After Successful Treatment in the Observation Phase of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial
    Dellon, Evan S.
    Woosley, John T.
    Arrington, Ashley
    McGee, Sarah J.
    Covington, Jacquelyn
    Moist, Susan E.
    Gebhart, Jessica H.
    Galanko, Joseph A.
    Baron, John A.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 18 (07) : 1483 - +
  • [19] Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of sublingual or intramuscular piroxicam in the treatment of renal colic - A comparative study
    Altay, B.
    Horasanli, K.
    Sarica, K.
    Tanriverdi, O.
    Kendirci, M.
    Miroglu, C.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2007, 79 (01) : 73 - 75
  • [20] Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and drotaverine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized comparative study with aceclofenac
    Pareek, Anil
    Chandurkar, Nitin B.
    Patil, Rajeshree T.
    Agrawal, Swati N.
    Uday, Rajini B.
    Tambe, Sanjaykumar G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 152 (01) : 86 - 90