Simplification of genetic programs: a literature survey

被引:14
|
作者
Javed, Noman [1 ]
Gobet, Fernand [1 ]
Lane, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, CPNSS, London, England
[2] Univ Hertfordshire, Dept Comp Sci, Hatfield, Herts, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Simplification; Genetic programming; Bloat control; Explainability; NUMERICAL SIMPLIFICATION; BLOAT;
D O I
10.1007/s10618-022-00830-7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Genetic programming (GP), a widely used evolutionary computing technique, suffers from bloat-the problem of excessive growth in individuals' sizes. As a result, its ability to efficiently explore complex search spaces reduces. The resulting solutions are less robust and generalisable. Moreover, it is difficult to understand and explain models which contain bloat. This phenomenon is well researched, primarily from the angle of controlling bloat: instead, our focus in this paper is to review the literature from an explainability point of view, by looking at how simplification can make GP models more explainable by reducing their sizes. Simplification is a code editing technique whose primary purpose is to make GP models more explainable. However, it can offer bloat control as an additional benefit when implemented and applied with caution. Researchers have proposed several simplification techniques and adopted various strategies to implement them. We organise the literature along multiple axes to identify the relative strengths and weaknesses of simplification techniques and to identify emerging trends and areas for future exploration. We highlight design and integration challenges and propose several avenues for research. One of them is to consider simplification as a standalone operator, rather than an extension of the standard crossover or mutation operators. Its role is then more clearly complementary to other GP operators, and it can be integrated as an optional feature into an existing GP setup. Another proposed avenue is to explore the lack of utilisation of complexity measures in simplification. So far, size is the most discussed measure, with only two pieces of prior work pointing out the benefits of using time as a measure when controlling bloat.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1300
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Acs, Szvetlana
    Dallimer, Martin
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Hanley, Nick
    Wilson, Paul
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 15 (05) : 406 - 414
  • [22] Survey of the training needs of genetic assistants supports the creation of genetic assistant training programs
    Rider, Renee A.
    Cubano, Luis
    Madden, Ebony B.
    Rowley, Robb K.
    Manolio, Teri A.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2024, 33 (04) : 733 - 744
  • [23] ON AUTOMATIC SIMPLIFICATION OF SOURCE-LANGUAGE PROGRAMS
    CLARK, ER
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1966, 9 (07) : 480 - &
  • [24] Algebraic simplification of GP programs during evolution
    Wong, Phillip
    Zhang, Mengjie
    GECCO 2006: GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, VOL 1 AND 2, 2006, : 927 - +
  • [25] MOLECULAR-GENETIC ASPECTS OF IMMUNOGENESIS (LITERATURE SURVEY)
    VOROBEV, AA
    KLYUCHAR.LA
    ZHURNAL MIKROBIOLOGII EPIDEMIOLOGII I IMMUNOBIOLOGII, 1972, (10): : 26 - &
  • [26] HOW CSR PROGRAMS AFFECT EMPLOYEES' HAPPINESS. A LITERATURE SURVEY
    Gorovei, Alina-Alexandra
    2020 BASIQ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: NEW TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS AND CONSUMPTION, 2020, : 329 - 334
  • [28] Online program simplification in genetic programming
    Zhang, Mengjie
    Wong, Phillip
    Qian, Dongping
    SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4247 : 592 - 600
  • [29] A Relaxed Approach to Simplification in Genetic Programming
    Johnston, Mark
    Liddle, Thomas
    Zhang, Mengjie
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6021 : 110 - +
  • [30] Improving Generalization of Evolved Programs through Automatic Simplification
    Helmuth, Thomas
    McPhee, Nicholas Freitag
    Pantridge, Edward
    Spector, Lee
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'17), 2017, : 937 - 944