Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:5
|
作者
Han, Zhenchuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ren, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Long [4 ]
Ma, Chao [5 ]
Liu, Jianheng [2 ]
Li, Jiantao [2 ]
Liu, Xiao [2 ]
Liu, Qingzu [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Keya [2 ]
Tang, Peifu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Fourth Med Ctr, Sr Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Rocket Force Characterist Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[4] Kunming Med Univ, Kunming 650000, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Key Lab Modern Measurement & Control Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; CAGE RETROPULSION; DISC; DISEASE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1155/2022/4266564
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods. MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45 & DEG; cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. Results. The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Geriatric Patients
    Hsieh, Cheng-Ta
    Sun, Jui-Ming
    Chen, Yuan -Shen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2023, 17 (03) : 195 - 200
  • [42] Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Martinez, Orlando
    Shah, Varunil
    Herring, Eric Z.
    Labak, Collin M.
    Mauria, Rohit
    Smith, Gabriel A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC NURSING, 2025, 44 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [43] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)
    Saela, Stephen
    Pompliano, Michael
    Varghese, Jeffrey
    Sinha, Kumar
    Faloon, Michael
    Emami, Arash
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [44] Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
    Dun Liu
    Xinyu Huang
    Chongyang Zhang
    Qin Wang
    Hua Jiang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19 (1)
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Review of Techniques and Outcomes
    Karikari, Isaac O.
    Isaacs, Robert E.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S294 - S301
  • [46] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [47] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [48] Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine
    Fan, Wei
    Guo, Li-Xin
    Zhao, Dan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 150 : E81 - E88
  • [49] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qing-Yi
    Tan, Jie
    Huang, Kai
    Xie, Hui-Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [50] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    Qing-Yi Zhang
    Jie Tan
    Kai Huang
    Hui-Qi Xie
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22