Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:5
|
作者
Han, Zhenchuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ren, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Long [4 ]
Ma, Chao [5 ]
Liu, Jianheng [2 ]
Li, Jiantao [2 ]
Liu, Xiao [2 ]
Liu, Qingzu [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Keya [2 ]
Tang, Peifu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Fourth Med Ctr, Sr Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Rocket Force Characterist Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[4] Kunming Med Univ, Kunming 650000, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Key Lab Modern Measurement & Control Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; CAGE RETROPULSION; DISC; DISEASE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1155/2022/4266564
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods. MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45 & DEG; cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. Results. The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [32] A novel technique for awake, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Choy, Winward
    Miller, Catherine A.
    Robinson, Leslie C.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (04)
  • [33] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821
  • [34] Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Silva, Pedro S.
    Pereira, Paulo
    Monteiro, Pedro
    Silva, Pedro A.
    Vaz, Rui
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [35] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Easley, Kirk
    Lee, Jun-Seok
    Hong, Jae-Young
    Virk, Michael
    Hsieh, Patrick C.
    Yoon, Sangwook T.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 143S - 150S
  • [36] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Burak M. Ozgur
    Kevin Yoo
    Gerardo Rodriguez
    William R. Taylor
    European Spine Journal, 2005, 14 : 887 - 894
  • [37] Pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Luo, Peng
    Wu, Jia
    Mao, Guang-Yun
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 36 (06)
  • [38] Pearls: Improving Upon Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (03) : 501 - 505
  • [39] Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
    Ozgur, BM
    Yoo, K
    Rodriguez, G
    Taylor, WR
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (09) : 887 - 894
  • [40] Intraoperative electromyography monitoring in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Ghosh, Subrata
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 6 (02) : 126 - 132