Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:5
|
作者
Han, Zhenchuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ren, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Long [4 ]
Ma, Chao [5 ]
Liu, Jianheng [2 ]
Li, Jiantao [2 ]
Liu, Xiao [2 ]
Liu, Qingzu [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Keya [2 ]
Tang, Peifu [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese PLA Med Sch, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Fourth Med Ctr, Sr Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[3] PLA Rocket Force Characterist Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[4] Kunming Med Univ, Kunming 650000, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Key Lab Modern Measurement & Control Technol, Minist Educ, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; CAGE RETROPULSION; DISC; DISEASE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1155/2022/4266564
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the biomechanics of a novel fusion strategy (hybrid internal fixation+horizontal cage position) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Methods. MIS-TLIF finite element models for three fusion strategies were created based on computed tomography images, namely, Model-A, hybrid internal fixation (ipsilateral pedicle screw and contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation)+horizontal cage position; Model-B, bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation+horizontal cage position; and Model-C, BPS fixation+oblique 45 & DEG; cage position. A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed. Results. The ROM for Models A, B, and C were not different (P > 0.05) but were significantly lower than the ROM of Model-INT (P < 0.0001). Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for Models A, B, and C, the trend was similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system was significantly higher in Model-A than that of Models B and C, but only the difference between Models A and B was significant (P < 0.05). The peak stress of the cage in Model-A was significantly lower than that of Models B and C (P < 0.01). Conclusion. Hybrid internal fixation with horizontal single cage implantation can provide the same biomechanical stability as traditional fixation while reducing peak stress on the cage and vertebral endplate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Finite Element Analysis of Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Chuncheng Zhao
    Xinhu Wang
    Changchun Chen
    Yanzhong Kang
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2014, 70 : 609 - 613
  • [2] Finite Element Analysis of Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zhao, Chuncheng
    Wang, Xinhu
    Chen, Changchun
    Kang, Yanzhong
    CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS, 2014, 70 (01) : 609 - 613
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [5] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Hoffmann, Christoph-Heinrich
    Kandziora, Frank
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (03): : 180 - 191
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Won-chul
    Park, Jeong-Yoon
    Kim, Kyung Hyun
    Kuh, Sung Uk
    Chin, Dong Kyu
    Kim, Keun Su
    Cho, Yong Eun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 85 : 236 - 243
  • [7] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Elboghdady, Islam M.
    Naqvi, Abbas
    Jorgenson, Anton Y.
    Marquez-Lara, Alejandro
    Singh, Kern
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [8] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis
    Tsahtsarlis, Antonio
    Wood, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (06) : 858 - 861
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Badlani, Neil
    Yu, Elizabeth
    Kreitz, Tyler
    Khan, Safdar
    Kurd, Mark F.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (02): : 62 - 64
  • [10] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26