Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned

被引:192
|
作者
Forsythe, Laura P. [1 ]
Ellis, Lauren E. [1 ]
Edmundson, Lauren [2 ]
Sabharwal, Raj [2 ]
Rein, Alison [2 ]
Konopka, Kristen [1 ]
Frank, Lori [1 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] AcademyHealth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
patient-centered outcomes research; comparative effectiveness research (CER); patient engagement; CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CARE RESEARCH; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; CONSUMERS; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients and healthcare stakeholders are increasingly becoming engaged in the planning and conduct of biomedical research. However, limited research characterizes this process or its impact. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patient and stakeholder engagement in the 50 Pilot Projects funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and identify early contributions and lessons learned. DESIGN: A self-report instrument was completed by researchers between 6 and 12 months following project initiation. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven principal investigators or their designees (94 % response rate) participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES Self-report of types of stakeholders engaged, stages and levels of engagement, facilitators and barriers to engagement, lessons learned, and contributions from engagement were measured. KEY RESULTS: Most (83 %) reported engaging more than one stakeholder in their project. Among those, the most commonly reported groups were patients (90 %), clinicians (87 %), health system representatives (44 %), caregivers (41 %), and advocacy organizations (41 %). Stakeholders were commonly involved in topic solicitation, question development, study design, and data collection. Many projects engaged stakeholders in data analysis, results interpretation, and dissemination. Commonly reported contributions included changes to project methods, outcomes or goals; improvement of measurement tools; and interpretation of qualitative data. Investigators often identified communication and shared leadership strategies as "critically important" facilitators (53 and 44 % respectively); lack of stakeholder time was the most commonly reported challenge (46 %). Most challenges were only partially resolved. Early lessons learned included the importance of continuous and genuine partnerships, strategic selection of stakeholders, and accommodation of stakeholders' practical needs. CONCLUSIONS: PCORI Pilot Projects investigators report engaging a variety of stakeholders across many stages of research, with specific changes to their research attributed to engagement. This study identifies early lessons and barriers that should be addressed to facilitate engagement. While this research suggests potential impact of stakeholder engagement, systematic characterization and evaluation of engagement at multiple stages of research is needed to build the evidence base.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MANAGEMENT OF RESEARCH PROJECTS - LESSONS LEARNED
    Betta, Jan
    Jastrzebska, Joanna
    CBU INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 2017: INNOVATIONS IN SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2017, 5 : 39 - 44
  • [32] ESTUARY WATERWAY PROJECTS - LESSONS LEARNED
    MCCARTNEY, BL
    HERRMANN, FA
    SIMMONS, HB
    JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (04): : 409 - 421
  • [33] Engagement with Healthcare Payers: Lessons Learned
    Marano, Dan
    Dubin, Marc G.
    CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (02) : 25 - 29
  • [34] Neurosurgery Community Engagement: Lessons Learned
    Hansen, Rosemary T. Behmer
    Hansen, Ryan A. Behmer
    Markosian, Christopher
    Mazzola, Catherine A.
    Mammis, Antonios
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 143 : 579 - 580
  • [35] Engagement with Healthcare Payers: Lessons Learned
    Dan Marano
    Marc G. Dubin
    Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, 2024, 12 : 25 - 29
  • [36] Dynamics of stakeholder engagement in mega transport infrastructure projects
    Erkul, Mehmet
    Yitmen, Ibrahim
    Celik, Tahir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2020, 13 (07) : 1465 - 1495
  • [37] Using REDCap to track stakeholder engagement: A time-saving tool for PCORI-funded studies
    Gesell, Sabina B.
    Halladay, Jacqueline R.
    Mettam, Laurie H.
    Sissine, Mysha E.
    Staplefoote-Boynton, B. Lynette
    Duncan, Pamela W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2020, 4 (02) : 108 - 114
  • [38] An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD
    Bell-Brown, Ari
    Watabayashi, Kate
    Kreizenbeck, Karma
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Bansal, Aasthaa
    Barlow, William E.
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Mercurio, Anne Marie
    Segarra-Vazquez, Barbara
    Kurttila, Florence
    Myers, Jamie S.
    Golenski, John D.
    Johnson, Judy
    Erwin, Robert L.
    Walia, Guneet
    Crawford, Jeffrey
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (18) : 1313 - 1321
  • [39] Transparent Stakeholder Engagement in Practice: Lessons Learned from Applying Comprehensive Environmental Assessment to Research Planning for Nanomaterials
    Powers, Christina
    Hendren, Christine
    Wang, Amy
    Davis, J. Michael
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 10 (04) : 498 - 510
  • [40] Promoting patient engagement during care transitions after surgery using mobile technology: Lessons learned from the MobiMD pilot study
    Diehl, Thomas M.
    Barrett, James R.
    Van Doorn, Rachel
    Stafford, Linda M. Cherney
    Hanlon, Bret M.
    Weber, Sharon M.
    Voils, Corrine I.
    Abbott, Daniel E.
    SURGERY, 2022, 172 (01) : 219 - 225