Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned

被引:192
|
作者
Forsythe, Laura P. [1 ]
Ellis, Lauren E. [1 ]
Edmundson, Lauren [2 ]
Sabharwal, Raj [2 ]
Rein, Alison [2 ]
Konopka, Kristen [1 ]
Frank, Lori [1 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] AcademyHealth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
patient-centered outcomes research; comparative effectiveness research (CER); patient engagement; CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CARE RESEARCH; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; CONSUMERS; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients and healthcare stakeholders are increasingly becoming engaged in the planning and conduct of biomedical research. However, limited research characterizes this process or its impact. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patient and stakeholder engagement in the 50 Pilot Projects funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and identify early contributions and lessons learned. DESIGN: A self-report instrument was completed by researchers between 6 and 12 months following project initiation. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven principal investigators or their designees (94 % response rate) participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES Self-report of types of stakeholders engaged, stages and levels of engagement, facilitators and barriers to engagement, lessons learned, and contributions from engagement were measured. KEY RESULTS: Most (83 %) reported engaging more than one stakeholder in their project. Among those, the most commonly reported groups were patients (90 %), clinicians (87 %), health system representatives (44 %), caregivers (41 %), and advocacy organizations (41 %). Stakeholders were commonly involved in topic solicitation, question development, study design, and data collection. Many projects engaged stakeholders in data analysis, results interpretation, and dissemination. Commonly reported contributions included changes to project methods, outcomes or goals; improvement of measurement tools; and interpretation of qualitative data. Investigators often identified communication and shared leadership strategies as "critically important" facilitators (53 and 44 % respectively); lack of stakeholder time was the most commonly reported challenge (46 %). Most challenges were only partially resolved. Early lessons learned included the importance of continuous and genuine partnerships, strategic selection of stakeholders, and accommodation of stakeholders' practical needs. CONCLUSIONS: PCORI Pilot Projects investigators report engaging a variety of stakeholders across many stages of research, with specific changes to their research attributed to engagement. This study identifies early lessons and barriers that should be addressed to facilitate engagement. While this research suggests potential impact of stakeholder engagement, systematic characterization and evaluation of engagement at multiple stages of research is needed to build the evidence base.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Dual-track CCS stakeholder engagement: Lessons learned from FutureGen in Illinois
    Hund, Gretchen
    Greenberg, Sallie E.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 6218 - 6225
  • [12] HemoKT: lessons learned for better patient engagement in peer education
    Jackson, Mathieu
    Careta, Francisco
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2020, 26 : 100 - 100
  • [13] LESSONS LEARNED IN THE AUDIT OF PROJECTS
    Munteanu, Florea Ionela
    Mirea, Marioara
    BASIQ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: NEW TRENDS IN SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS AND CONSUMPTION 2018, 2018, : 517 - 524
  • [14] Lessons Learned to Building Stakeholder Engagement during the Initial Stages of Pragmatic Research Development and Implementation
    Combs, Jennifer
    Barzman, Drew
    Hemphill, Rosalie
    Osborn, Alexander
    Sorter, Michael
    Decker, Reine
    PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2021, 92 (02) : 781 - 791
  • [15] Lessons Learned to Building Stakeholder Engagement during the Initial Stages of Pragmatic Research Development and Implementation
    Jennifer Combs
    Drew Barzman
    Rosalie Hemphill
    Alexander Osborn
    Michael Sorter
    Reine Decker
    Psychiatric Quarterly, 2021, 92 : 781 - 791
  • [16] Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects
    Clifton O. Bingham
    Susan J. Bartlett
    Peter A. Merkel
    Thelma J. Mielenz
    Paul A. Pilkonis
    Lauren Edmundson
    Emily Moore
    Rajeev K. Sabharwal
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 2109 - 2116
  • [17] Lessons Learned from Developing a Patient Engagement Panel: An OCHIN Report
    Arkind, Jill
    Likumahuwa-Ackman, Sonja
    Warren, Nate
    Dickerson, Kay
    Robbins, Lynn
    Norman, Kathy
    Devoe, Jennifer E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (05) : 632 - 638
  • [18] Unanticipated Therapeutic Value of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Stakeholder Engagement Project for Homebound Older Adults
    Sheehan, Orla C.
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    Garrett, Sarah B.
    Harrison, Krista L.
    Mickler, Alexandria
    England, Ashley L. Eaton
    Basyal, Pragyashree Sharma
    Garrigues, Sarah K.
    Leff, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 21 (08) : 1172 - 1173
  • [19] IMPROVING PATIENT ENGAGEMENT AND EXPERIENCE: LESSONS LEARNED FROM LONG COVID
    Walsh-Messinger, Julie
    Sizemore, Jenna
    Kaouk, Sahar
    Jalloh, Mohamed
    Quale, Maya
    Bishof, Karyn
    Greenspan, Noah
    Debidda, Marcella
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2022, 84 (05): : A136 - A137
  • [20] Experiences and Lessons Learned From the RADx-UP Consortium Community Engagement Projects
    Farrar, Brandy
    Middleton, Ann
    Thompson, Lee
    Akiwumi, Ann-Marie
    Gallo, Inigo Verduzco
    Munoz, Perfecto
    Nuno, Miriam A.
    Alaniz, Mariela
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 114 : S405 - S409