Methodology for Integrating Conventional and Network Reliability Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Cheng-Hao [1 ]
Chang, Ping-Chen [2 ]
Lin, Yi-Kuei [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Natl Quemoy Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Jinning 892, Kinmen County, Taiwan
[3] Asia Univ, Dept Business Adm, Taichung 413, Taiwan
关键词
multi-state network; time attribute; conventional reliability theory; system reliaiblity; STOCHASTIC-FLOW NETWORK; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; FINITE BUFFER STORAGE; CORRELATED FAILURES; SYSTEM; IMPACT; ALGORITHM; TERMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A network with multi-state arcs or nodes is commonly called a multi-state network. In the real world, the system reliability of a multi-state network can vary over time. Hence, a critical issue emerges to characterize the time attribute in a stochastic flow network. To solve this issue, this study bridges conventional reliability theory and the reliability of multi-state network. This study utilizes exponential distribution as a possible reliability function to quantify the time attribute in a multi-state network. First, the reliability of every single component is modeled by exponential distribution, where such components comprise a multi-state element. Once the time constraint is given, the capacity probability distribution of arcs can be derived. Second, an algorithm to generate minimal capacity vectors for given demand is provided. Finally, the system reliability can be calculated in terms of the derived capacity probability distribution and the generated minimal capacity vectors. A maintenance issue is further discussed according to the result of system reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis I: Methodology
    Papanikolaou, VK
    Elnashai, AS
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2005, 9 (06) : 923 - 941
  • [22] SEQUENTIAL EVALUATION OF TERMINAL PAIR RELIABILITY IN A RELIABILITY NETWORK
    KUMAR, S
    MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1982, 22 (02): : 151 - 162
  • [23] Evaluation methodology for network management systems
    Ray, P
    NOMS '98 - 1998 IEEE NETWORK OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 590 - 599
  • [24] Power Network Reliability Framework for Integrating Cable Design and Ageing
    Kopsidas, Konstantinos
    Liu, Shuran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (02) : 1521 - 1532
  • [25] Pavement network reliability: a dual-network based on fuzzy set methodology
    Wang, Xingju
    Gou, Yang
    Han, Zhe
    Zhang, Zhanmin
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2019, 13 (03) : 475 - 484
  • [26] A Novel Methodology for Assessing the Reliability of Simulation Evaluation Instruments
    Adamson, Katie Anne
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2011, 7 (06) : E245 - E245
  • [27] Reliability evaluation in seismic design:: A response surface methodology
    Möller, O
    Foschi, RO
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (03) : 579 - 603
  • [28] Measurements Methodology for the Reliability Evaluation of Intelligent Power Modules
    Cataliotti, A.
    Di Cara, D.
    Marsala, G.
    Ragusa, A.
    Tine, G.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC) PROCEEDINGS, 2014, : 665 - 669
  • [29] Methodology for the evaluation of forecast reliability of production planning systems
    Schuh, Guenther
    Potente, Till
    Hauptvogel, Annika
    VARIETY MANAGEMENT IN MANUFACTURING: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 47TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2014, 17 : 469 - 474
  • [30] Reliability evaluation of hierarchical hypercube network
    Liu X.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhou S.
    Li X.
    Tongxin Xuebao/Journal on Communications, 2021, 42 (03): : 111 - 121