Setup accuracy and dose attenuation of a wooden immobilization system for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

被引:1
|
作者
Nitta, Yuya [1 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Murata, Seiya [1 ]
Isono, Masaru [1 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ]
Masaoka, Akira [1 ]
Inui, Shoki [1 ,2 ]
Washio, Hayate [3 ,4 ]
Yoshinaka, Reimi [1 ]
Sagawa, Tomohiro [1 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Teshima, Teruki [5 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Kumamoto, Japan
[5] Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Ctr, Osaka, Japan
关键词
lung SBRT; wooden baseplate; setup verification; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; LOCALIZATION; DEVICES; ERRORS;
D O I
10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0089
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluated the setup error and dose absorption of an immobilization system with a shell and wooden baseplate (SW) for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: Setup errors in 109 patients immobilized with an SW or BodyFix system (BF) were compared. Dose attenuation rates of materials for baseplates were measured with an ion-chamber. Ionization measurements were performed from 90 degrees to 180 degrees gantry angle in 10 degrees increments, with the ball water equivalent phantom placed at the center of the wood and carbon baseplates whose effects on dose distribution were compared using an electron portal imaging device. Results: The ratio for the anterior-posterior, cranial-caudal, and right-left of the cases within 3-mm registered shifts in interfractional setup error were 90.9%, 89.2%, and 97.4% for the SW, and 93.2%, 91.6%, and 98.0% for the BF, respectively. For intrafractional setup error, 98.3%, 97.4%, and 99.1% for the SW and 96.6%, 95.8%, and 98.7% for the BF were within 3-mm registered shifts, respectively. In the center position, the average (minimum/maximum) dose attenuation rates from 90 degrees to 180 degrees for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 0.5 (0.1/2.8)% and 1.0 (-0.1/10.1)% with 6 MV, respectively. The gamma passing rates of 2%/2 mm for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 99.7% and 98.3% (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The immobilization system with an SW is effective for lung SBRT since it is comparable to the BF in setup accuracy. Moreover, the wooden baseplate had lower radiation attenuation rates and affected the dose distribution less than the carbon baseplate.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 820
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient Setup Accuracy and Immobilization Errors during Lung, Spine, and Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Delivery: Preliminary Experience using a Body Fix with Dual Vacuum Immobilization and a Robotic Couch
    Luo, G.
    Gopalakrishnan, M.
    Zhang, Y.
    Bautista, J.
    Mallett, H.
    Mehta, M.
    Hayes, J. P.
    Koneru, N.
    Sathiaseelan, V.
    Kalapurakal, J. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S61 - S62
  • [32] Evaluation of initial setup errors of two immobilization devices for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Teshima, Teruki
    Cardenes, Higinia
    Das, Indra J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (04): : 62 - 68
  • [33] Biologically effective dose and overall survival in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Osamu Tanaka
    Norihiko Funaguchi
    Sayaka Toyoshi
    Takuya Taniguchi
    Kousei Ono
    Chiyoko Makita
    Masayuki Matsuo
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology, 2020, 13 : 353 - 356
  • [34] Biologically effective dose and overall survival in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Tanaka, Osamu
    Funaguchi, Orihiko
    Toyoshi, Sayaka
    Taniguchi, Takuya
    Ono, Kousei
    Makita, Chiyoko
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    MEMO-MAGAZINE OF EUROPEAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 13 (03) : 353 - 356
  • [35] Setup Uncertainties for the Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Zhang, Q.
    Cao, Y.
    Jamshidi, A.
    Vigneri, P.
    Madu, C.
    Potters, L.
    Klein, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3363 - 3363
  • [36] Setup Evaluation of 2 Immobilization Systems for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Ueda, Y.
    Das, I. J.
    Cardenes, H. R.
    Teshima, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S836 - S836
  • [37] Esophageal Dose Tolerance in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Abelson, J. A.
    Murphy, J.
    Chang, S. D.
    Soltys, S. G.
    Le, Q.
    Loo, B. W.
    Gibbs, I. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S267 - S267
  • [38] Prediction accuracy of lung tumor stereotactic body radiotherapy using CyberKnife Synchrony tracking
    Chiu, Tin Lok
    Fok, Tsz Ching
    Yip, Natalie Kar Wei
    Yeung, Fu Ki
    Cheung, Chi Wai
    Yu, Siu Ki
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4140 - S4142
  • [39] Accuracy of Deformable Image Registration for Reirradiation of Lung Cancer Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Mahon, R. N.
    Jan, N.
    Hugo, G. D.
    Muscu, S.
    Weiss, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E304 - E305
  • [40] Intrafractional setup errors in patients undergoing non-invasive fixation using an immobilization system during hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for lung tumors
    Watanabe, Meguru
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    Kuriyama, Kengo
    Komiyama, Takafumi
    Marino, Kan
    Araya, Masayuki
    Saito, Ryo
    Aoki, Shinichi
    Maehata, Yoshiyasu
    Tominaga, Rihito
    Oguri, Jitsuhiko
    Sano, Naoki
    Araki, Tsutomu
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (04) : 762 - 768