Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation

被引:39
|
作者
Bloss, Cinnamon S. [1 ,2 ]
Schork, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Topol, Eric J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Translat Sci Inst, Scripps Genom Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Scripps Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol & Expt Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
direct-to-consumer; genetic testing; personalized medicine; genomic risk assessment; consumer genomics; RISK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing has generated controversy, however the actual impact of testing on consumer behaviour has been understudied, particularly for pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. Methods We recruited a sample of adults who purchased a DTC genomic test and had previously received their genomic test results for complex disease risk. All participants additionally underwent PGx testing. At follow-up, to assess the impact of PGx testing on consumer behaviour, healthcare utilisation and psychological status were compared between approximately a third of participants who had received their PGx results and the remaining two-thirds of participants who were still awaiting results. The PGx test included genetic testing for drug effectiveness or risk of side effects for 12 medications. Results At follow-up, there were 481 PGx test recipients and 844 non-recipients still awaiting results. PGx test recipients had more physician visits (p=0.04) and were more likely to share their results with their physician (p=0.001). Both groups showed a decrease in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up, with a trend for PGx recipients to show less of a decrease compared with non-recipients (p=0.10). PGx recipients were more likely to report that their physician ordered additional tests (p=0.01) based on their genomic test. There were no group differences in follow-up test-related distress (p=0.67). Conclusions DTC PGx risk profiling among a selected sample of individuals was associated with increased physician utilisation and did not result in any adverse changes in psychological health or follow-up test-related distress.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] User Attitudes On Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Saha, Debjani
    Chan, Anna
    Stacy, Brook
    Javkar, Kiran
    Patkar, Sushant
    Mazurek, Michelle L.
    2020 5TH IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P 2020), 2020, : 120 - 138
  • [32] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [33] Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market
    Wright, Caroline F.
    Gregory-Jones, Shelley
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (09) : 594 - 594
  • [34] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a bibliometric analysis
    Xavier, Bracke
    McVeigh, T. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 2) : 73 - 73
  • [35] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review
    Jiang, Sharon
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Lebo, David
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (6) : 1190 - 1198
  • [36] Direct-to-consumer microbiome testing needs regulation
    不详
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 9 (07): : 583 - 583
  • [37] Improving Direct-to-Consumer Medical Testing Reply
    Rockwell, Kimberly Lovett
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (16): : 1613 - 1614
  • [38] The Ethical Challenges of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Cheryl Berg
    Kelly Fryer-Edwards
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 77 : 17 - 31
  • [39] Public Perspectives on Direct-to-Consumer Testing Oversight
    Jiang, Sharon
    Lebo, David
    Schultz, Thomas
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2024, 58 (06) : 1027 - 1030
  • [40] The ethics and regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Paula Boddington
    Genome Medicine, 1