Direct-to-consumer pharmacogenomic testing is associated with increased physician utilisation

被引:39
|
作者
Bloss, Cinnamon S. [1 ,2 ]
Schork, Nicholas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Topol, Eric J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Translat Sci Inst, Scripps Genom Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Scripps Hlth, La Jolla, CA USA
[3] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Mol & Expt Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] Scripps Clin, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
direct-to-consumer; genetic testing; personalized medicine; genomic risk assessment; consumer genomics; RISK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101909
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing has generated controversy, however the actual impact of testing on consumer behaviour has been understudied, particularly for pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing. Methods We recruited a sample of adults who purchased a DTC genomic test and had previously received their genomic test results for complex disease risk. All participants additionally underwent PGx testing. At follow-up, to assess the impact of PGx testing on consumer behaviour, healthcare utilisation and psychological status were compared between approximately a third of participants who had received their PGx results and the remaining two-thirds of participants who were still awaiting results. The PGx test included genetic testing for drug effectiveness or risk of side effects for 12 medications. Results At follow-up, there were 481 PGx test recipients and 844 non-recipients still awaiting results. PGx test recipients had more physician visits (p=0.04) and were more likely to share their results with their physician (p=0.001). Both groups showed a decrease in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up, with a trend for PGx recipients to show less of a decrease compared with non-recipients (p=0.10). PGx recipients were more likely to report that their physician ordered additional tests (p=0.01) based on their genomic test. There were no group differences in follow-up test-related distress (p=0.67). Conclusions DTC PGx risk profiling among a selected sample of individuals was associated with increased physician utilisation and did not result in any adverse changes in psychological health or follow-up test-related distress.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 89
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct-to-consumer personalized genomic testing
    Bloss, Cinnamon S.
    Darst, Burcu F.
    Topol, Eric J.
    Schork, Nicholas J.
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2011, 20 : R132 - R141
  • [22] Direct-to-consumer genetic laboratory testing
    Popovich, Bradley
    CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2007, 116 (04)
  • [23] Direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing
    Levin, M
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (01): : 45 - 46
  • [24] Control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    不详
    LANCET, 2008, 372 (9647): : 1360 - 1360
  • [25] The ethics of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Udesky, Laurie
    LANCET, 2010, 376 (9750): : 1377 - 1378
  • [26] Benefits and Risks of Direct-to-Consumer Testing
    Ayala-Lopez, Nadia
    Nichols, James H.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (10) : 1193 - 1198
  • [27] Privacy in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Park, Jason Y.
    Risher, Michael T.
    Caulfield, Timothy
    Baudhuin, Linnea M.
    Schwab, Abraham P.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 65 (05) : 612 - 617
  • [28] Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Mahon, Suzanne M.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2012, 8 (04) : 260 - 260
  • [29] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Access and marketing
    McCabe, LL
    McCabe, ERB
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 6 (01) : 58 - 59
  • [30] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Interdisciplinary Crossroads
    Stein, Richard A.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (01) : 35 - 67