Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus intragastric balloon: a case-control study

被引:38
|
作者
Genco, Alfredo [2 ]
Cipriano, Massimiliano [2 ]
Materia, Alberto [2 ]
Bacci, Vincenzo [2 ]
Maselli, Roberta [2 ]
Musmeci, Luca [2 ]
Lorenzo, Michele [1 ]
Basso, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] ASL NA5 UOML, I-80058 Naples, Torre Annunziat, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med, Paride Stefanini Surg Dept, Rome, Italy
关键词
Morbid obesity; Laparoscopy; Sleeve gastrectomy; Longitudinal gastrectomy; Intragastric balloon; Comorbidity; Bariatric surgery; WEIGHT-LOSS; BARIATRIC SURGERY; SHORT-TERM; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-008-0285-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIBA (R)) to lose weight and comorbidities after 12 months of follow-up before a more invasive bariatric procedure. From January 2004 to December 2006, 40 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a first step in biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Controls (n = 80) were selected based on charts of patients who, during the same period, underwent BioEnterics intragastric balloon therapy. In both groups we considered: length of procedure, hospital stay, intraoperative or endoscopic complications, postoperative or postendoscopic complications, comorbidities at baseline, after 6 months (time of BIB removal), and after 12 months from baseline, and weight loss parameters [weight in kg, percentage excess weight less (%EWL), body mass index (BMI), and percentage excess BMI loss (%EBL)]. Results are expressed as mean +/- A standard deviation. Mortality, intra- and postoperative complications (in LSG group), and intra- and postendoscopic complications (in BIB group) were absent. Mean operative time in the LSG group was 120 +/- A 40 (range 60-200) min. Mean positioning time for BIB was 15 +/- A 5 (range 10-25) min. BMI at baseline was 54.1 +/- A 2.9 (range 45.1-55.9) kg/m(2) and 54.8 +/- A 2.5 (range 45.1-56.2) kg/m(2) in BIB and LSG groups, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mean BMI was 46.2 +/- A 3.5 and 45.3 +/- A 5.5 kg/m(2) in the BIB and LSG patients, respectively [p = not significant (ns)]. After 12 months BIB patients regained BMI, even if strictly followed with a diet regimen, while LSG patients continued to lose weight. Significant differences between groups were absent for the comorbidities considered. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and BioEnterics intragastric balloon are two valid options for producing weight loss as a first-step procedure. LSG has all the related risks of general anesthesia, laparoscopic surgery, and digestive anastomosis, whereas BIB presents a very low rate of minor complications, such as psychological intolerance. For all these reasons, at this time, BIB is considered a better option than LSG as a first-step procedure in the short term (12 months).
引用
收藏
页码:1849 / 1853
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study with 200 Patients
    Ramon Vilallonga
    José Manuel Fort
    Enric Caubet
    Oscar Gonzalez
    Manel Armengol
    Obesity Surgery, 2013, 23 : 1501 - 1507
  • [32] CASE REPORT: INTRAGASTRIC BALLOON ON A PATIENT WITH SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY Post-operative complications
    Andreou, A.
    Kostler, T.
    Kratt, T.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (SUPPL 2) : 647 - 647
  • [33] A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Omentopexy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Awad, P.
    Hassan, B.
    Elkomos, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [34] A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with omentopexy Versus conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Hassan, Basma
    Awad, Philobater
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [35] Adjustable Intragastric Balloon vs Non-Adjustable Intragastric Balloon: Case-Control Study on Complications, Tolerance, and Efficacy
    Genco, Alfredo
    Dellepiane, Daniela
    Baglio, Giovanni
    Cappelletti, Fulvio
    Frangella, Francesca
    Maselli, Roberta
    Dante, Maria Chiara
    Camoirano, Romina
    Lorenzo, Michele
    Basso, Nicola
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (07) : 953 - 958
  • [36] SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY VERSUS THREE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY
    Wang, Liang
    Fan, Qing
    Zhang, Nengwei
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 93 - 93
  • [37] Effect of Hyoscine-n-Butylbromide on Multimodal Analgesia for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
    Kantekin, Cigdem Unal
    Sipahi, Mesut
    Adali, Ibrahim
    Talih, Gamze
    BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 2020, 15 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [38] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity in Patients After Orthotopic Liver Transplant: a Matched Case-Control Study
    Levan Tsamalaidze
    John A. Stauffer
    Lisa C. Arasi
    Diego E. Villacreses
    Jose Salvador Serrano Franco
    Steven Bowers
    Enrique F. Elli
    Obesity Surgery, 2018, 28 : 444 - 450
  • [39] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity in Patients After Orthotopic Liver Transplant: a Matched Case-Control Study
    Tsamalaidze, Levan
    Stauffer, John A.
    Arasi, Lisa C.
    Villacreses, Diego E.
    Serrano Franco, Jose Salvador
    Bowers, Steven
    Elli, Enrique F.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (02) : 444 - 450
  • [40] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by duodenal switch in selected patients versus single-stage duodenal switch for superobesity: case-control study
    Iannelli, Antonio
    Schneck, Anne-Sophie
    Topart, Philippe
    Carles, Michel
    Hebuterne, Xavier
    Gugenheim, Jean
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2013, 9 (04) : 531 - 538