Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus intragastric balloon: a case-control study

被引:38
|
作者
Genco, Alfredo [2 ]
Cipriano, Massimiliano [2 ]
Materia, Alberto [2 ]
Bacci, Vincenzo [2 ]
Maselli, Roberta [2 ]
Musmeci, Luca [2 ]
Lorenzo, Michele [1 ]
Basso, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] ASL NA5 UOML, I-80058 Naples, Torre Annunziat, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Sch Med, Paride Stefanini Surg Dept, Rome, Italy
关键词
Morbid obesity; Laparoscopy; Sleeve gastrectomy; Longitudinal gastrectomy; Intragastric balloon; Comorbidity; Bariatric surgery; WEIGHT-LOSS; BARIATRIC SURGERY; SHORT-TERM; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-008-0285-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIBA (R)) to lose weight and comorbidities after 12 months of follow-up before a more invasive bariatric procedure. From January 2004 to December 2006, 40 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a first step in biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Controls (n = 80) were selected based on charts of patients who, during the same period, underwent BioEnterics intragastric balloon therapy. In both groups we considered: length of procedure, hospital stay, intraoperative or endoscopic complications, postoperative or postendoscopic complications, comorbidities at baseline, after 6 months (time of BIB removal), and after 12 months from baseline, and weight loss parameters [weight in kg, percentage excess weight less (%EWL), body mass index (BMI), and percentage excess BMI loss (%EBL)]. Results are expressed as mean +/- A standard deviation. Mortality, intra- and postoperative complications (in LSG group), and intra- and postendoscopic complications (in BIB group) were absent. Mean operative time in the LSG group was 120 +/- A 40 (range 60-200) min. Mean positioning time for BIB was 15 +/- A 5 (range 10-25) min. BMI at baseline was 54.1 +/- A 2.9 (range 45.1-55.9) kg/m(2) and 54.8 +/- A 2.5 (range 45.1-56.2) kg/m(2) in BIB and LSG groups, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mean BMI was 46.2 +/- A 3.5 and 45.3 +/- A 5.5 kg/m(2) in the BIB and LSG patients, respectively [p = not significant (ns)]. After 12 months BIB patients regained BMI, even if strictly followed with a diet regimen, while LSG patients continued to lose weight. Significant differences between groups were absent for the comorbidities considered. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and BioEnterics intragastric balloon are two valid options for producing weight loss as a first-step procedure. LSG has all the related risks of general anesthesia, laparoscopic surgery, and digestive anastomosis, whereas BIB presents a very low rate of minor complications, such as psychological intolerance. For all these reasons, at this time, BIB is considered a better option than LSG as a first-step procedure in the short term (12 months).
引用
收藏
页码:1849 / 1853
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study
    Tognoni, Valeria
    Benavoli, Domenico
    Bianciardi, Emanuela
    Perrone, Federico
    Ippoliti, Simona
    Gaspari, Achille
    Gentileschi, Paolo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [22] Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-control study and 3 years of follow-up
    Boza, Camilo
    Gamboa, Cristian
    Salinas, Jose
    Achurra, Pablo
    Vega, Andrea
    Perez, Gustavo
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2012, 8 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [23] Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy – Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study
    Daniela T. Sala
    Stefania R. Fodor
    Septimiu Voidăzan
    Mariana C. Tilinca
    Adriana M. Gomotîrceanu
    Ion C. Puiac
    Marius I. Ciorba
    Renata Moriczi
    Botond I. Kiss
    Razvan M. Ion
    Constantin Calin
    Radu Mircea Neagoe
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 2420 - 2427
  • [24] Effect of Significant Postoperative Complications on Decision Regret After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Case-Control Study
    Bartosiak, Katarzyna
    Janik, Michal R.
    Waledziak, Maciej
    Pasnik, Krzysztof
    Kwiatkowski, Andrzej
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (08) : 2591 - 2597
  • [25] Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study
    Sala, Daniela T.
    Fodor, Stefania R.
    Voidazan, Septimiu
    Tilinca, Mariana C.
    Gomotirceanu, Adriana M.
    Puiac, Ion C.
    Ciorba, Marius I.
    Moriczi, Renata
    Kiss, Botond I.
    Ion, Razvan M.
    Calin, Constantin
    Neagoe, Radu Mircea
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (08) : 2420 - 2427
  • [26] Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy – Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study
    Mohit Bhatia
    Elia Azir
    Shamsi El-Hasanii
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 3685 - 3685
  • [27] Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study
    Bhatia, Mohit
    Azir, Elia
    El-Hasanii, Shamsi
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (11) : 3685 - 3685
  • [28] Single Incision Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - A Pilot Study
    Govil, A. B.
    Lakdawala, M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (08) : 997 - 997
  • [29] Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study with 200 Patients
    Vilallonga, Ramon
    Manuel Fort, Jose
    Caubet, Enric
    Gonzalez, Oscar
    Armengol, Manel
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (10) : 1501 - 1507
  • [30] Effect of preoperative intragastric balloon treatment on perioperative and postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study
    Rzepa, Anna
    Karpinska, Izabela
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Pisarska-Adamczyk, Magdalena
    Stefura, Tomasz
    Kawa, Ilona
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Major, Piotr
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 96 (03)