Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center

被引:6
|
作者
Engle, Jeff A. [1 ]
Traynor, Anne M. [2 ]
Campbell, Toby C. [2 ,3 ]
Wisinski, Kari B. [2 ]
LoConte, Noelle [2 ]
Liu, Glenn [2 ]
Wilding, George [4 ]
Kolesar, Jill M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Carbone Canc Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, 567 TODD,789 S Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Oral chemotherapy; adherence; relative dose intensity; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ANTICANCER AGENTS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCE; THERAPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/1078155217704989
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Oral chemotherapy is increasingly utilized leaving the patient responsible for self-administering an often complex regimen where adverse effects are common. Non-adherence and reduced relative dose intensity are both associated with poorer outcomes in the community setting but are rarely reported in clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to quantify adherence and relative dose intensity in oncology clinical trials and to determine patient and study related factors that influence adherence and relative dose intensity. Methods Patients were identified from non-industry-funded clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2013 at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center. Data were extracted from primary research records. Descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling was performed using SAS 9.4. Results A total of 17 clinical trials and 266 subjects were included. Mean adherence was greater than 97% for the first eight cycles. Mean relative dose intensity was less than 90% for the first cycle and declined over time. Male gender, a performance status of 1 or 2, metastatic disease, and traveling more than 90 miles to reach the cancer center were associated with higher relative dose intensity. Conclusions Patients with cancer enrolled in clinical trials are highly adherent but unlikely to achieve protocol specified relative dose intensity. Given that determining the phase II dose is the primary endpoint of phase I trials, incorporating relative dose intensity into this determination should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 353
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development and Implementation of a Clinical Eyewash and Safety Shower Risk Assessment Process in an Academic Medical Center
    Pate, William John
    Wilke, Jeremy
    ACS CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2020, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [42] Efficient clinical research infrastructure and trial performance: Assessment of a dedicated clinical trials unit within an academic cancer center
    Tang, C.
    Hesse, K.
    Sanders, D.
    Davis, S.
    Kurzrock, R.
    Lee, J. J.
    Bernstam, F. Meric
    Hong, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 69 : S64 - S64
  • [43] Quality improvement interventions to reduce chemotherapy dose-modification ordering errors at a large academic medical center.
    Soriano, Margaret
    Chang, Anne
    Galway, Aralee
    Listro, Laura
    Liu, Evaline
    McGuire, Jessica
    Mulvey, Therese Marie
    O'Donoghue, Sheila
    Parikh, Aparna Raj
    Rosato, Erika
    Ryan, David P.
    White, Lawren
    Woolwine, Melissa Anne
    Isakoff, Steven J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (30)
  • [44] Incidence of reduced chemotherapy relative dose intensity among women with early stage breast cancer in US clinical practice
    Derek Weycker
    Rich Barron
    John Edelsberg
    Alex Kartashov
    Gary H. Lyman
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 133 : 301 - 310
  • [45] Incidence of reduced chemotherapy relative dose intensity among women with early stage breast cancer in US clinical practice
    Weycker, Derek
    Barron, Rich
    Edelsberg, John
    Kartashov, Alex
    Lyman, Gary H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 133 (01) : 301 - 310
  • [46] Pediatric oncology provider perspectives and patient/family perceptions of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting management: Experiences at an academic medical center
    Bloomhardt, Hadley
    Rubin, Melissa
    Xue, Yanling
    Jin, Zhezhen
    Masino, Laura
    Seidel, Drew
    Hijiya, Nobuko
    Beauchemin, Melissa
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2024, 71 (04)
  • [47] Improved reporting of delivered dose intensity is needed in clinical trials of chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).
    Dale, DC
    Crawford, J
    McCarter, G
    Lyman, GH
    BLOOD, 2001, 98 (11) : 240B - 240B
  • [48] The organization, structure and support of clinical trials (CTs) in Hematology and Oncology (H&O) through the "Center of Clinical Investigations, Optimization, Standardization and Safety in Hematolgy and Oncology" (CIO) at the University Medical Center Freiburg
    Kohlweyer, U.
    Burbeck, M.
    Jacobs, D.
    Wider, S.
    Surlan, I
    Hug, S.
    Rohdenburg, S.
    Reinhardt, H.
    Schaaf, P.
    Schall, H.
    Urban, E. -J
    Friedemann, N.
    Engelhardt, M.
    ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 33 : 72 - 73
  • [49] Dose intensive chemotherapy (Cx) in advanced thymoma: Initial report of Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials (JCOG 9605 and 9606).
    Kunitoh, H.
    Tamura, T.
    Fukuda, H.
    Nakagawa, K.
    Takeda, K.
    Nishiwaki, Y.
    Katagami, N.
    Yokoyama, A.
    Noda, K.
    Saijo, N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 384S - 384S
  • [50] Non-cancer clinical trials start-up metrics at an academic medical center: Implications for advancing research
    Cernik, Colin
    Shergina, Elena
    Thompson, Jeffrey
    Blackwell, Karen
    Stephens, Kyle
    Kimminau, Kim S.
    Wick, Jo
    Mayo, Matthew S.
    Gajewski, Byron
    He, Jianghua
    Mudaranthakam, Dinesh Pal
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 22