Assessment of adherence and relative dose intensity with oral chemotherapy in oncology clinical trials at an academic medical center

被引:6
|
作者
Engle, Jeff A. [1 ]
Traynor, Anne M. [2 ]
Campbell, Toby C. [2 ,3 ]
Wisinski, Kari B. [2 ]
LoConte, Noelle [2 ]
Liu, Glenn [2 ]
Wilding, George [4 ]
Kolesar, Jill M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Carbone Canc Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, 567 TODD,789 S Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
Oral chemotherapy; adherence; relative dose intensity; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ANTICANCER AGENTS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCE; THERAPY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/1078155217704989
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Aims Oral chemotherapy is increasingly utilized leaving the patient responsible for self-administering an often complex regimen where adverse effects are common. Non-adherence and reduced relative dose intensity are both associated with poorer outcomes in the community setting but are rarely reported in clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to quantify adherence and relative dose intensity in oncology clinical trials and to determine patient and study related factors that influence adherence and relative dose intensity. Methods Patients were identified from non-industry-funded clinical trials conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2013 at the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center. Data were extracted from primary research records. Descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling was performed using SAS 9.4. Results A total of 17 clinical trials and 266 subjects were included. Mean adherence was greater than 97% for the first eight cycles. Mean relative dose intensity was less than 90% for the first cycle and declined over time. Male gender, a performance status of 1 or 2, metastatic disease, and traveling more than 90 miles to reach the cancer center were associated with higher relative dose intensity. Conclusions Patients with cancer enrolled in clinical trials are highly adherent but unlikely to achieve protocol specified relative dose intensity. Given that determining the phase II dose is the primary endpoint of phase I trials, incorporating relative dose intensity into this determination should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 353
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COVID-19 pandemic and impact on cancer clinical trials: An academic medical center perspective
    Marcum, Michelle
    Kurtzweil, Nicky
    Vollmer, Christine
    Schmid, Lisa
    Vollmer, Ashley
    Kastl, Alison
    Acker, Kelly
    Gulati, Shuchi
    Grover, Punita
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Ahmad, Syed A.
    Sohal, Davendra
    Wise-Draper, Trisha M.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (17): : 6141 - 6146
  • [32] Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center
    Simon, MS
    Du, W
    Flaherty, L
    Philip, PA
    Lorusso, P
    Miree, C
    Smith, D
    Brown, DR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (11) : 2046 - 2052
  • [33] Evaluating medication adherence of oral endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors in a large academic medical center
    Paranjpe, Rutugandha
    Hwang, Grace
    Opsomer, Carine
    Lu, Kelvin
    Abajue, Uzo
    Zaghloul, Hanna
    Abughosh, Susan
    Trivedi, Meghana
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (06)
  • [34] Impact of a pharmacist-to-dose direct oral anticoagulant protocol on medication errors at an academic medical center
    Willeford, Andrew
    Leiman, Victoria
    Noel, Zachary R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 4 (11): : 1392 - 1400
  • [35] Pragmatic dose-escalation methods incorporating relative dose intensity assessment for molecularly targeted agents in phase I trials
    Hirakawa, Akihiro
    Tanaka, Yuichi
    Kaneko, Shuhei
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 16
  • [36] ENHANCING SAFETY AND DELIVERY OF ORAL CHEMOTHERAPY UTILIZING LEAN METHODOLOGY: SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE AT AN ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER
    Hulen, Kathy
    Fernandez, Debbie
    Wright, Jeff
    Tsue, Terry
    Scott, Leigh Anne
    Hoffman, Marc
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (02)
  • [37] Assessment of Whether the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Value Framework and the European Society for Medical Oncology's Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Measure Absolute or Relative Clinical Survival Benefit: An Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Saluja, Ronak
    Everest, Louis
    Cheng, Sierra
    Cheung, Matthew
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (08) : 1188 - 1194
  • [38] The Oncology Care Model and lung cancer: Retrospective review of claims and clinical data at a large academic medical center
    Vakkalagadda, Chetan
    Desai, Bijal
    Mohindra, Nisha Anjali
    Kircher, Sheetal Mehta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (28)
  • [39] Relative dose intensity as a proxy measure of quality and prognosis in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in daily clinical practice
    Schraa, S. J.
    Frerichs, K. A.
    Agterof, M. J.
    Hunting, J. C. B.
    Los, M.
    de Jong, P. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 79 : 152 - 157
  • [40] Assessment of Clinical Ordering Practices of Phosphatidylethanol Monitoring for Alcohol Use at a Large Academic Medical Center
    Herb, Thomas
    Gherasim, Carmen
    Manthei, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2021, 156 : S11 - S12