Compensatory Interventions for Cognitive Impairments in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Allott, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Van-der-EL, Kristi [1 ,2 ]
Bryce, Shayden [1 ,2 ]
Parrish, Emma M. [3 ]
McGurk, Susan R. [4 ]
Hetrick, Sarah [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Bowie, Christopher R. [6 ]
Kidd, Sean [7 ]
Hamilton, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Killackey, Eoin [1 ,2 ]
Velligan, Dawn [8 ]
机构
[1] Orygen, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] San Diego State Univ, Univ Calif San Diego Joint Doctoral Program Clin, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Ctr Psychiat Rehabil, Dept Occupat Therapy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, San Antonio, TX USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
internal self-management; external strategies; environmental modification; errorless learning; schizophrenia; severe mental illness; functional outcome; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SMS TEXT MESSAGES; SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT; MENTAL-ILLNESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; REMEDIATION; REHABILITATION; STRATEGIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbz134
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective. Cognitive compensatory interventions aim to alleviate psychosocial disability by targeting functioning directly using aids and strategies, thereby minimizing the impact of cognitive impairment. The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive compensatory interventions for psychosis by examining the effects on functioning and symptoms, and exploring whether intervention factors, study design, and age influenced effect sizes. Methods. Electronic databases (Ovid Medline, PsychINFO) were searched up to October 2018. Records obtained through electronic and manual searches were screened independently by two reviewers according to selection criteria. Data were extracted to calculate estimated effects (Hedge's g) of treatment on functioning and symptoms at post-intervention and follow-up. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.Results. Twenty-six studies, from 25 independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis (1654 participants, mean age = 38.9 years, 64% male). Meta-analysis revealed a medium effect of compensatory interventions on functioning compared to control conditions (Hedge's g = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.60, P <.001), with evidence of relative durability at follow-up (Hedge's g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.54, P <.001). Analysis also revealed small significant effects of cognitive compensatory treatment on negative, positive, and general psychiatric symptoms, but not depressive symptoms. Estimated effects did not significantly vary according to treatment factors (ie, compensatory approach, dosage), delivery method (ie, individual/group), age, or risk of bias. Longer treatment length was associated with larger effect sizes for functioning outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was identified.Conclusion. Cognitive compensatory interventions are associated with robust, durable improvements in functioning in people with psychotic illnesses.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 883
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reducing self-stigma in psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions
    Lamarca, Maria
    Espinosa, Victoria
    Acun, Vanessa
    Vila-Badia, Regina
    Balsells-Mejia, Sol
    Moritz, Steffen
    Berna, Fabrice
    Konig, Caroline
    Gaweda, Lukasz
    Barajas, Ana
    Ochoa, Susana
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2024, 342
  • [32] Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Devoe, Daniel J.
    Farris, Megan S.
    Townes, Parker
    Addington, Jean
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 13 (01) : 3 - 17
  • [33] Negative Symptom Interventions in Youth at Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Devoe, Daniel J.
    Peterson, Aaron
    Addington, Jean
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2018, 44 (04) : 807 - 823
  • [34] Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sin, Jacqueline
    Gillard, Steve
    Spain, Debbie
    Cornelius, Victoria
    Chen, Tao
    Henderson, Claire
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 56 : 13 - 24
  • [35] Do Family Interventions Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Claxton, Melanie
    Onwumere, Juliana
    Fornells-Ambrojo, Miriam
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [36] Promoting flourishing* in persons with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of positive psychology interventions
    Jansen, Jens Einar
    Gleeson, John
    Bendall, Sarah
    Alcazar-Corcoles, Miguel Angel
    Rice, Simon
    Simonsen, Erik
    McGorry, Patrick
    Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 10 : 249 - 249
  • [37] Effectiveness of Suicide-Focused Psychosocial Interventions in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bornheimer, Lindsay A.
    Zhang, Anao
    Li, Juliann
    Hiller, Matthew
    Tarrier, Nicholas
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2020, 71 (08) : 829 - 838
  • [38] Social and occupational recovery in early psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions
    Frawley, E.
    Cowman, M.
    Lepage, M.
    Donohoe, G.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (05) : 1787 - 1798
  • [39] The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jamieson, Matthew
    Cullen, Breda
    McGee-Lennon, Marilyn
    Brewster, Stephen
    Evans, Jonathan J.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 24 (3-4) : 419 - 444
  • [40] Effectiveness of Brain Gaming in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kletzel, Sandra L.
    Sood, Pallavi
    Negm, Ahmed
    Heyn, Patricia C.
    Krishnan, Shilpa
    Machtinger, Joseph
    Hu, Xiaolei
    Devos, Hannes
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (11) : 2281 - +