Compensatory Interventions for Cognitive Impairments in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Allott, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Van-der-EL, Kristi [1 ,2 ]
Bryce, Shayden [1 ,2 ]
Parrish, Emma M. [3 ]
McGurk, Susan R. [4 ]
Hetrick, Sarah [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Bowie, Christopher R. [6 ]
Kidd, Sean [7 ]
Hamilton, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Killackey, Eoin [1 ,2 ]
Velligan, Dawn [8 ]
机构
[1] Orygen, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] San Diego State Univ, Univ Calif San Diego Joint Doctoral Program Clin, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Ctr Psychiat Rehabil, Dept Occupat Therapy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, San Antonio, TX USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
internal self-management; external strategies; environmental modification; errorless learning; schizophrenia; severe mental illness; functional outcome; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SMS TEXT MESSAGES; SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT; MENTAL-ILLNESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; REMEDIATION; REHABILITATION; STRATEGIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbz134
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective. Cognitive compensatory interventions aim to alleviate psychosocial disability by targeting functioning directly using aids and strategies, thereby minimizing the impact of cognitive impairment. The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive compensatory interventions for psychosis by examining the effects on functioning and symptoms, and exploring whether intervention factors, study design, and age influenced effect sizes. Methods. Electronic databases (Ovid Medline, PsychINFO) were searched up to October 2018. Records obtained through electronic and manual searches were screened independently by two reviewers according to selection criteria. Data were extracted to calculate estimated effects (Hedge's g) of treatment on functioning and symptoms at post-intervention and follow-up. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.Results. Twenty-six studies, from 25 independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis (1654 participants, mean age = 38.9 years, 64% male). Meta-analysis revealed a medium effect of compensatory interventions on functioning compared to control conditions (Hedge's g = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.60, P <.001), with evidence of relative durability at follow-up (Hedge's g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.54, P <.001). Analysis also revealed small significant effects of cognitive compensatory treatment on negative, positive, and general psychiatric symptoms, but not depressive symptoms. Estimated effects did not significantly vary according to treatment factors (ie, compensatory approach, dosage), delivery method (ie, individual/group), age, or risk of bias. Longer treatment length was associated with larger effect sizes for functioning outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was identified.Conclusion. Cognitive compensatory interventions are associated with robust, durable improvements in functioning in people with psychotic illnesses.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 883
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Adolescent Cognitive–Behavioral Sleep Interventions
    Matthew J. Blake
    Lisa B. Sheeber
    George J. Youssef
    Monika B. Raniti
    Nicholas B. Allen
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2017, 20 : 227 - 249
  • [22] Cognitive behavioural therapy versus other interventions on mental health in people with sensory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trott, M.
    Koblitz, A.
    Pardhan, S.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2025, 189
  • [23] Childhood trauma and cognitive biases associated with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Croft, Jazz
    Martin, David
    Madley-Dowd, Paul
    Strelchuk, Daniela
    Davies, Jonathan
    Heron, Jon
    Teufel, Christoph
    Zammit, Stanley
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [24] Childhood trauma and cognitive biases associated with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Croft, J.
    Heron, J.
    Zammit, S.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 56 : S501 - S501
  • [25] Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis: rationale and protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hutton, Paul
    Wood, Lisa
    Taylor, Peter J.
    Irving, Kerry
    Morrison, Anthony P.
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2014, 6 (03): : 220 - 230
  • [26] Trust and psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prasannakumar, Akash
    Kumar, Vijay
    Rao, Naren P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (11) : 5218 - 5226
  • [27] Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chandler, M. J.
    Parks, A. C.
    Marsiske, M.
    Rotblatt, L. J.
    Smith, G. E.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 26 (03) : 225 - 251
  • [28] Everyday Impact of Cognitive Interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    M. J. Chandler
    A. C. Parks
    M. Marsiske
    L. J. Rotblatt
    G. E. Smith
    Neuropsychology Review, 2016, 26 : 225 - 251
  • [29] Efficacy of technology-based interventions in psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Morales-Pillado, Carla
    Fernandez-Castilla, Belen
    Sanchez-Gutierrez, Teresa
    Gonzalez-Fraile, Eduardo
    Barbeito, Sara
    Calvo, Ana
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 53 (13) : 6304 - 6315
  • [30] Psychological interventions for trauma in individuals who have psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sin, Jacqueline
    Spain, Debbie
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2017, 9 (01): : 67 - 81