Compensatory Interventions for Cognitive Impairments in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:34
|
作者
Allott, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Van-der-EL, Kristi [1 ,2 ]
Bryce, Shayden [1 ,2 ]
Parrish, Emma M. [3 ]
McGurk, Susan R. [4 ]
Hetrick, Sarah [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Bowie, Christopher R. [6 ]
Kidd, Sean [7 ]
Hamilton, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Killackey, Eoin [1 ,2 ]
Velligan, Dawn [8 ]
机构
[1] Orygen, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Youth Mental Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] San Diego State Univ, Univ Calif San Diego Joint Doctoral Program Clin, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Ctr Psychiat Rehabil, Dept Occupat Therapy, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Auckland, Dept Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[6] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Psychiat, San Antonio, TX USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
internal self-management; external strategies; environmental modification; errorless learning; schizophrenia; severe mental illness; functional outcome; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SMS TEXT MESSAGES; SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT; MENTAL-ILLNESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; REMEDIATION; REHABILITATION; STRATEGIES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbz134
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective. Cognitive compensatory interventions aim to alleviate psychosocial disability by targeting functioning directly using aids and strategies, thereby minimizing the impact of cognitive impairment. The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive compensatory interventions for psychosis by examining the effects on functioning and symptoms, and exploring whether intervention factors, study design, and age influenced effect sizes. Methods. Electronic databases (Ovid Medline, PsychINFO) were searched up to October 2018. Records obtained through electronic and manual searches were screened independently by two reviewers according to selection criteria. Data were extracted to calculate estimated effects (Hedge's g) of treatment on functioning and symptoms at post-intervention and follow-up. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool.Results. Twenty-six studies, from 25 independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis (1654 participants, mean age = 38.9 years, 64% male). Meta-analysis revealed a medium effect of compensatory interventions on functioning compared to control conditions (Hedge's g = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.60, P <.001), with evidence of relative durability at follow-up (Hedge's g = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.19, 0.54, P <.001). Analysis also revealed small significant effects of cognitive compensatory treatment on negative, positive, and general psychiatric symptoms, but not depressive symptoms. Estimated effects did not significantly vary according to treatment factors (ie, compensatory approach, dosage), delivery method (ie, individual/group), age, or risk of bias. Longer treatment length was associated with larger effect sizes for functioning outcomes. No evidence of publication bias was identified.Conclusion. Cognitive compensatory interventions are associated with robust, durable improvements in functioning in people with psychotic illnesses.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 883
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPENSATORY COGNITIVE APPROACHES TO IMPROVING FUNCTIONING IN PSYCHOSIS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Allott, Kelly
    van-der-EL, Kristi
    Parrish, Emma
    Bowie, Chris
    Kidd, Sean
    McGurk, Susan
    Hetrick, Sarah
    Bryce, Shayden
    Hamilton, Matthew
    Killackey, Eoin
    Velligan, Dawn
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2018, 44 : S404 - S405
  • [2] Interventions and Cognitive Outcomes in Youth at Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Addington, Jean
    Devoe, Dan
    Piskulic, Danijela
    Romanowska, Sylvia
    Townes, Parker
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 : S591 - S592
  • [3] Pharmacological interventions for social cognitive impairments in schizophrenia: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yamada, Yuji
    Okubo, Ryo
    Tachimori, Hisateru
    Uchino, Takashi
    Kubota, Ryotaro
    Okano, Hiroki
    Ishikawa, Shuhei
    Horinouchi, Toru
    Takanobu, Keisuke
    Sawagashira, Ryo
    Hasegawa, Yumi
    Sasaki, Yohei
    Nishiuchi, Motohiro
    Kawashima, Takahiro
    Tomo, Yui
    Hashimoto, Naoki
    Ikezawa, Satoru
    Nemoto, Takahiro
    Watanabe, Norio
    Sumiyoshi, Tomiki
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [4] Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stafford, Megan R.
    Jackson, Hannah
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Morrison, Anthony P.
    Kendall, Tim
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [5] A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive behavioural informed psychological interventions for psychiatric inpatients with psychosis
    Wood, Lisa
    Williams, Claire
    Billings, Jo
    Johnson, Sonia
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2020, 222 : 133 - 144
  • [6] Cognitive remediation for inpatients with psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cella, Matteo
    Price, Tom
    Corboy, Holly
    Onwumere, Juliana
    Shergill, Sukhi
    Preti, Antonio
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (07) : 1062 - 1076
  • [7] Cognitive interventions in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandler, M. J.
    Parks, A. C.
    Marsiske, M.
    Rotblatt, L. J.
    Smith, G. E.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 31 (04) : 709 - 709
  • [8] Interventions and Transition in Youth at Risk of Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Devoe, Daniel
    Farris, Megan S.
    Townes, Parker
    Addington, Jean
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 12 : 173 - 173
  • [9] Interventions for subjective cognitive decline: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhome, Rohan
    Berry, Alex J.
    Huntley, Jonathan D.
    Howard, Robert J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [10] Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hutton, P.
    Taylor, P. J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (03) : 449 - 468