Social marketing of water and sanitation products: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature

被引:65
|
作者
Evans, W. D. [1 ]
Pattanayak, S. K. [2 ]
Young, S. [1 ]
Buszin, J. [3 ]
Rai, S. [2 ]
Bihm, Jasmine Wallace [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sanford Inst Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Populat Serv Int, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Social marketing; Health promotion; Behavior change; Water; Sanitation; Diarrheal disease; DIARRHEA PREVENTION; CHILDHOOD DIARRHEA; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; SAFE STORAGE; INTERVENTION; HEALTH; PROMOTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Like commercial marketing, social marketing uses the 4 "Ps" and seeks exchange of value between the marketer and consumer. Behaviors such as handwashing, and products such as those for oral rehydration treatment (ORT), can be marketed like commercial products in developing countries. Although social marketing in these areas is growing, there has been no systematic review of the current state of practice, research and evaluation. We searched the literature for published peer-reviewed studies available through major online publication databases. We identified manuscripts in the health, social science, and business literature on social marketing that used at least one of the 4 Ps of marketing and had a behavioral objective targeting the behaviors or products related to improving water and sanitation. We developed formalized decision rules and applied them in identifying articles for review. We initially identified 117 articles and reviewed a final set of 32 that met our criteria. Social marketing is a widespread strategy. Marketing efforts have created high levels of awareness of health threats and solutions, including behavior change and socially marketed products. There is widespread use of the 4 Ps of marketing, with price interventions being the least common. Evaluations show consistent improvements in behavioral mediators but mixed results in behavior change. Interventions have successfully used social marketing following widely recommended strategies. Future evaluations need to focus on mediators that explain successful behavior change in order to identify best practices and improve future programs. More rigorous evaluations including quasi-experimental designs and randomized trials are needed. More consistent reporting of evaluation results that permits meta-analysis of effects is needed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 25
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reporting of ethics in peer-reviewed verbal autopsy studies: a systematic review
    Joshi, Rohina
    Faruqui, Neha
    Nagarajan, Shilpa R.
    Rampatige, Rasika
    Martiniuk, Alex
    Gouda, Hebe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (01) : 255 - 279
  • [32] If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?
    Louis K. Wagner
    Pediatric Radiology, 2014, 44 : 468 - 474
  • [33] Hippotherapy: a systematic mapping review of peer-reviewed research, 1980 to 2018
    Wood, Wendy H.
    Fields, Beth E.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (10) : 1463 - 1487
  • [34] Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature
    Miller, Peter G.
    Curtis, Ashlee
    Sonderlund, Anders
    Day, Andrew
    Droste, Nic
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 2015, 41 (01): : 16 - 29
  • [35] How to Write a Scholarly Book Review for Publication in a Peer-Reviewed Journal A Review of the Literature
    Lee, Alexander D.
    Green, Bart N.
    Johnson, Claire D.
    Nyquist, Julie
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC EDUCATION, 2010, 24 (01): : 57 - 69
  • [36] Institutional Review Boards and Peer-Reviewed Publication
    Hamilton, D. Kirk
    Stichler, Jaynelle F.
    HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (02) : 81 - 84
  • [37] Facilitators and barriers to the regulation of medical cannabis: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature
    Ruheel, Mohammad Ali
    Gomes, Zoya
    Usman, Sana
    Homayouni, Pargol
    Ng, Jeremy Y.
    HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [38] Collective Impact: A Review of the Peer-reviewed Research
    Ennis, Gretchen
    Tofa, Matalena
    AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 73 (01) : 32 - 47
  • [39] Critiques of the Cass Review: Fact-Checking the Peer-Reviewed and Grey Literature
    Mcdeavitt, Kathleen
    Cohn, J.
    Levine, Stephen B.
    JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2025, 51 (02) : 175 - 199
  • [40] Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Term "Planetary Health" in the Peer-Reviewed Literature
    Rossa-Roccor, Verena
    Acheson, Emily Sohanna
    Andrade-Rivas, Federico
    Coombe, Michelle
    Ogura, Saori
    Super, Laura
    Hong, Andy
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8