Social marketing of water and sanitation products: A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature

被引:65
|
作者
Evans, W. D. [1 ]
Pattanayak, S. K. [2 ]
Young, S. [1 ]
Buszin, J. [3 ]
Rai, S. [2 ]
Bihm, Jasmine Wallace [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sanford Inst Publ Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Populat Serv Int, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Social marketing; Health promotion; Behavior change; Water; Sanitation; Diarrheal disease; DIARRHEA PREVENTION; CHILDHOOD DIARRHEA; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; SAFE STORAGE; INTERVENTION; HEALTH; PROMOTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Like commercial marketing, social marketing uses the 4 "Ps" and seeks exchange of value between the marketer and consumer. Behaviors such as handwashing, and products such as those for oral rehydration treatment (ORT), can be marketed like commercial products in developing countries. Although social marketing in these areas is growing, there has been no systematic review of the current state of practice, research and evaluation. We searched the literature for published peer-reviewed studies available through major online publication databases. We identified manuscripts in the health, social science, and business literature on social marketing that used at least one of the 4 Ps of marketing and had a behavioral objective targeting the behaviors or products related to improving water and sanitation. We developed formalized decision rules and applied them in identifying articles for review. We initially identified 117 articles and reviewed a final set of 32 that met our criteria. Social marketing is a widespread strategy. Marketing efforts have created high levels of awareness of health threats and solutions, including behavior change and socially marketed products. There is widespread use of the 4 Ps of marketing, with price interventions being the least common. Evaluations show consistent improvements in behavioral mediators but mixed results in behavior change. Interventions have successfully used social marketing following widely recommended strategies. Future evaluations need to focus on mediators that explain successful behavior change in order to identify best practices and improve future programs. More rigorous evaluations including quasi-experimental designs and randomized trials are needed. More consistent reporting of evaluation results that permits meta-analysis of effects is needed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 25
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PEER SUPPORT OPPORTUNITIES ACROSS THE CANCER CARE CONTINUUM: A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW OF RECENT PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE
    Ellis, Katrina R.
    Kowitt, Sarah
    Carlisle, Veronica
    Bhushan, Nivedita L.
    Black, Kristin Z.
    Brodar, Kaitlyn
    Cranley, Nicole M.
    Davis, Kia L.
    Eng, Eugenia
    Martin, Michelle
    McGuirt, Jared
    Sokol, Rebeccah L.
    Tang, Patrick Y.
    Vines, Anissa I.
    Walker, Jennifer S.
    Fisher, Edwin B.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S202 - S202
  • [22] Dog Bites in the United States from 1971 to 2018: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature
    Bailey, Chad M.
    Hinchcliff, Katharine M.
    Moore, Zachary
    Pu, Lee L. Q.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (05) : 1166 - 1176
  • [23] Randomised controlled trials of veterinary homeopathy: Characterising the peer-reviewed research literature for systematic review
    Mathie, Robert T.
    Hacke, Daniela
    Clausen, Juergen
    HOMEOPATHY, 2012, 101 (04) : 196 - 203
  • [24] Social Workers' Attitudes toward Peer-Reviewed Literature: The Evidence Base
    Knight, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 33 (02) : 177 - 195
  • [25] Examining the Peer-Reviewed Literature on Tobacco-Related Social Media Data: Scoping Review
    Donaldson, Scott, I
    Dormanesh, Allison
    Majmundar, Anuja
    Perez, Cindy
    Lopez, Heather
    Saghian, Megan
    Beard, Trista A.
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    Allem, Jon-Patrick
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (04) : 413 - 420
  • [26] Curating the world's peer-reviewed literature
    Rew, David A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2012, 94 (04) : 219 - 220
  • [27] Waterbirth: An Integrative Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Literature
    Nutter, Elizabeth
    Meyer, Shaunette
    Shaw-Battista, Jenna
    Marowitz, Amy
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (03) : 286 - 319
  • [28] US and EU patient registries in the peer-reviewed literature: a targeted review
    Frizell-Armitage, Amelia
    Clements, Sarah J.
    Stevens, Julia
    Chambers, Helen
    Foulcer, Simon
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 : 27 - 27
  • [29] DISCUSSIONS OF COST IN THE PEER-REVIEWED MEDICAL LITERATURE
    MARKMAN, M
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02): : A319 - A319
  • [30] If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?
    Wagner, Louis K.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 44 : 468 - 474