Evaluation of the effect of spray pressure in hand-held sprayers in a greenhouse tomato crop

被引:24
|
作者
Sanchez-Hermosilla, Julian [1 ]
Paez, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Rincon, Victor J. [1 ]
Carvajal, Fernando [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Dept Agr Engn, Almeria 04120, Spain
[2] Andalusian Govt, Res Ctr IFAPA La Mojonera, Andalucia, Spain
关键词
Greenhouse; Spray lance; Spray gun; Spray pressure; Crop protection; FAN ORCHARD SPRAYER; SIZED APPLE-TREES; DROPLET SIZE; NOZZLE TYPE; DEPOSITION; LOSSES; VOLUME; REDUCTION; CANOPY; LIQUID;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2013.08.006
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In greenhouses, plant-protection products are usually applied by hand-held high-pressure spray guns or lances spraying at high volume rates. This low-technology equipment produces a deposit distribution of low uniformity on the plant canopy, heavy losses to the soil, and high exposure risk to workers. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of spray pressure on deposition and losses to the ground using a hand-held spray lance in a greenhouse tomato crop. Spray applications were made at three different pressures (1000 kPa, 1500 kPa and 2000 kPa) in two developmental stages of a tomato crop. The results show that for the applications at the highest pressure, the average deposit was between 22.5% and 34.6% less than at the two lower pressures. Also, the use of high pressures such as 2000 kPa hampered penetration into the plant canopy, with deposition values in the inner zones of the canopy of between 9.4% and 37.4% less than when pressures of 1000 kPa and 1500 kPa were used. Nevertheless, the losses to the ground for the highest pressure were between 10.3% and 24% lower than for the two lower pressures. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vibration risk evaluation in hand-held harvesters for olives
    Manetto, Giuseppe
    Cerruto, Emanuele
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 44 : 705 - 709
  • [32] Evaluation of an electronic hand-held spirometer in patients with asthma
    Hamid, S
    Corden, ZM
    Ryan, DP
    Burnett, I
    Cochrane, GM
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1998, 92 (10) : 1177 - 1180
  • [33] Fatigue evaluation of a hand-held device for the automated colonoscope
    Sheerer, Corey
    Choi, JungHun
    Medical Devices and Sensors, 2019, 2 (5-6):
  • [34] EVALUATION OF CAMERA SHAKE BY HAND-HELD SPECKLE PHOTOGRAPHY
    BURCH, JM
    ENNOS, AE
    QUINN, GB
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 1980, 18 (05): : 271 - 274
  • [35] Sound Quality Evaluation of Hand-Held Power Tools
    Horvat, M.
    Domitrovic, H.
    Jambrosic, K.
    ACTA ACUSTICA UNITED WITH ACUSTICA, 2012, 98 (03) : 487 - 504
  • [36] Evaluation of ultrasound lung comets by hand-held echocardiography
    Bedetti G.
    Gargani L.
    Corbisiero A.
    Frassi F.
    Poggianti E.
    Mottola G.
    Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 4 (1)
  • [37] PERKINS HAND-HELD APPLANATION TONOMETER - A CLINICAL EVALUATION
    WALLACE, J
    LOVELL, HG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1968, 52 (07) : 568 - &
  • [38] Measurements of Arterial Occlusion Pressure Using Hand-Held Devices
    Vehrs, Pat R.
    Richards, Shay
    Allen, Josh
    Barrett, Rachel
    Blazzard, Chase
    Burbank, Tyler
    Hart, Hannah
    Kasper, Nicole
    Lacey, Ryan
    Lopez, Daniela
    Fellingham, Gilbert W.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (05) : 873 - 880
  • [39] THE EFFECT OF HAND-HELD RADIO OPERATION ON AUDIO DOSIMETERS
    BOHL, CD
    CLARK, WW
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1993, 54 (03): : 121 - 126
  • [40] MONITORING CORN AND SOYBEAN CROP DEVELOPMENT WITH HAND-HELD RADIOMETER SPECTRAL DATA
    TUCKER, CJ
    ELGIN, JH
    MCMURTREY, JE
    FAN, CJ
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1979, 8 (03) : 237 - 248