Immunogenicity and safety of the tick-borne encephalitis vaccination (2009-2019): A systematic review

被引:22
|
作者
Rampa, John Ethan [1 ]
Askling, Helena Hervius [2 ]
Phung Lang [1 ]
Zens, Kyra Denise [1 ]
Gultekin, Nejla [3 ]
Stanga, Zeno [3 ]
Schlagenhauf, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, WHO Collaborating Ctr Travellers Hlth, Inst Epidemiol Biostat & Prevent, Ctr Travel Med,Dept Publ & Global Hlth,MilMedBiol, Hirschengraben 84, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Solna, Div Infect Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swiss Armed Forces, Fed Dept Def Civil Protect & Sport DDPS, Ctr Competence Mil & Disaster Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Booster; FSME; Immunogenicity; Priming; Safety; Surveillance; TBE; Vaccine; Vaccine failure; 1ST BOOSTER VACCINATION; LONG-TERM PERSISTENCE; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ANTIBODY PERSISTENCE; TBE VACCINATION; 0.5; ML; VIRUS; IMMUNIZATION; CHILDREN; SEROPERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101876
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is increasing in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of TBE-vaccination. Methods: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (#CRD42020155737) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus using specific terms. Original articles, case reports and research abstracts in English, French, German and Italian were included for screening and extracting (JER; PS). Results: Of a total of 2464 records, 49 original research publications were evaluated for immunogenicity and safety. TBE-vaccines showed adequate immunogenicity, good safety and interchangeability in adults and children with some differences in long-term protection (Seropositivity in 90.6-100% after primary vaccination; 84.9%-99.4% at 5 year follow up). Primary conventional vaccination schedule (days 0, 28, and 300) demonstrated the best immunogenic results (99-100% of seropositivity). Mixed brand primary vaccination presented adequate safety and immunogenicity with some exceptions. After booster follow-ups, accelerated conventional and rapid vaccination schedules were shown to be comparable in terms of immunogenicity and safety. First booster vaccinations five years after primary vaccination were protective in adults aged <50 years, leading to protective antibody levels from at least 5 years up to 10 years after booster vaccination. In older vaccinees, > 50 years, lower protective antibody titers were found. Allergic individuals showed an adequate response and immunosuppressed individuals a diminished response to TBE-vaccination. Conclusions: The TBE-vaccination is generally safe with rare serious adverse events. Schedules should, if possible, use the same vaccine brand (non-mixed). TBE-vaccines are immunogenic in terms of antibody response but less so when vaccination is started after the age of 50 years. Age at priming is a key factor in the duration of protection.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Lindquist, Lars
    Vapalahti, Olli
    LANCET, 2008, 371 (9627): : 1861 - 1871
  • [32] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Kunz, C
    Heinz, FX
    VACCINE, 2003, 21 : S1 - S2
  • [33] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Kaiser, Reinhard
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 22 (03) : 561 - +
  • [34] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Maass, G
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1996, 121 (24) : 812 - 812
  • [35] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Meyding-Lamade, Uta
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [36] TICK-BORNE ENCEPHALITIS
    不详
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1964, 1 (539): : 1455 - +
  • [37] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Kaiser, R.
    NERVENARZT, 2016, 87 (06): : 667 - 678
  • [38] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Dumpis, U
    Crook, D
    Oksi, J
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 28 (04) : 882 - 890
  • [39] Tick-borne encephalitis
    Gritsun, TS
    Lashkevich, VA
    Gould, EA
    ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 2003, 57 (1-2) : 129 - 146
  • [40] Tick-Borne Encephalitis - Viral Transmission and Considerations for Vaccination
    Zens, Kyra D.
    THERAPEUTISCHE UMSCHAU, 2022, 79 (09) : 471 - 481