Immunogenicity and safety of the tick-borne encephalitis vaccination (2009-2019): A systematic review

被引:22
|
作者
Rampa, John Ethan [1 ]
Askling, Helena Hervius [2 ]
Phung Lang [1 ]
Zens, Kyra Denise [1 ]
Gultekin, Nejla [3 ]
Stanga, Zeno [3 ]
Schlagenhauf, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, WHO Collaborating Ctr Travellers Hlth, Inst Epidemiol Biostat & Prevent, Ctr Travel Med,Dept Publ & Global Hlth,MilMedBiol, Hirschengraben 84, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Solna, Div Infect Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Swiss Armed Forces, Fed Dept Def Civil Protect & Sport DDPS, Ctr Competence Mil & Disaster Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Booster; FSME; Immunogenicity; Priming; Safety; Surveillance; TBE; Vaccine; Vaccine failure; 1ST BOOSTER VACCINATION; LONG-TERM PERSISTENCE; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ANTIBODY PERSISTENCE; TBE VACCINATION; 0.5; ML; VIRUS; IMMUNIZATION; CHILDREN; SEROPERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101876
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is increasing in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of TBE-vaccination. Methods: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (#CRD42020155737) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We searched CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus using specific terms. Original articles, case reports and research abstracts in English, French, German and Italian were included for screening and extracting (JER; PS). Results: Of a total of 2464 records, 49 original research publications were evaluated for immunogenicity and safety. TBE-vaccines showed adequate immunogenicity, good safety and interchangeability in adults and children with some differences in long-term protection (Seropositivity in 90.6-100% after primary vaccination; 84.9%-99.4% at 5 year follow up). Primary conventional vaccination schedule (days 0, 28, and 300) demonstrated the best immunogenic results (99-100% of seropositivity). Mixed brand primary vaccination presented adequate safety and immunogenicity with some exceptions. After booster follow-ups, accelerated conventional and rapid vaccination schedules were shown to be comparable in terms of immunogenicity and safety. First booster vaccinations five years after primary vaccination were protective in adults aged <50 years, leading to protective antibody levels from at least 5 years up to 10 years after booster vaccination. In older vaccinees, > 50 years, lower protective antibody titers were found. Allergic individuals showed an adequate response and immunosuppressed individuals a diminished response to TBE-vaccination. Conclusions: The TBE-vaccination is generally safe with rare serious adverse events. Schedules should, if possible, use the same vaccine brand (non-mixed). TBE-vaccines are immunogenic in terms of antibody response but less so when vaccination is started after the age of 50 years. Age at priming is a key factor in the duration of protection.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Vaccination and Tick-borne Encephalitis, Central Europe
    Heinz, Franz X.
    Stiasny, Karin
    Holzmann, Heidemarie
    Grgic-Vitek, Marta
    Kriz, Bohumir
    Essl, Astrid
    Kundi, Michael
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 19 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [12] Advances in vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis
    Rendi-Wagner, Pamela
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2008, 7 (05) : 589 - 596
  • [13] Immunogenicity and safety of rapid scheme vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis in HIV-1 infected persons
    Jilich, D.
    Maly, M.
    Kosina, P.
    Fleischhans, L.
    Machala, L.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 149
  • [14] Travelers' preferences for tick-borne encephalitis vaccination
    Poulos, Christine
    Boeri, Marco
    Coulter, Joshua
    Huang, Liping
    Schley, Katharina
    Pugh, Sarah J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (10) : 1495 - 1504
  • [15] Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe, 2007 to 2009
    Mantke, O. Donoso
    Escadafal, C.
    Niedrig, M.
    Pfeffer, M.
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2011, 16 (39): : 7 - 18
  • [16] Tick-borne encephalitis in Bulgaria, 2009 to 2012
    Mohareb, E.
    Christova, I.
    Soliman, A.
    Younan, R.
    Kantardjiev, T.
    EUROSURVEILLANCE, 2013, 18 (46): : 8 - 11
  • [17] Tick-borne encephalitis: A review of the literature
    Schöffel N.
    Volante G.
    Klingelhöfer D.
    Braun M.
    Groneberg D.A.
    Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie, 2017, 67 (3) : 155 - 157
  • [18] Cross-neutralisation of viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis complex following tick-borne encephalitis vaccination and/or infection
    McAuley, Alexander J.
    Sawatsky, Bevan
    Ksiazek, Thomas
    Torres, Maricela
    Korva, Misa
    Lotric-Furlan, Stanka
    Avsic-Zupanc, Tatjana
    von Messling, Veronika
    Holbrook, Michael R.
    Freiberg, Alexander N.
    Beasley, David W. C.
    Bente, Dennis A.
    NPJ VACCINES, 2017, 2
  • [19] Cross-neutralisation of viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis complex following tick-borne encephalitis vaccination and/or infection
    Alexander J. McAuley
    Bevan Sawatsky
    Thomas Ksiazek
    Maricela Torres
    Miša Korva
    Stanka Lotrič-Furlan
    Tatjana Avšič-Županc
    Veronika von Messling
    Michael R. Holbrook
    Alexander N. Freiberg
    David W. C. Beasley
    Dennis A. Bente
    npj Vaccines, 2
  • [20] Vaccination rate and adherence of tick-borne encephalitis vaccination in Germany
    Schley, Katharina
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    Beier, Dominik
    Schiffner-Rohe, Julia
    von Eiff, Christof
    Haeckl, Dennis
    Suess, Jochen
    VACCINE, 2021, 39 (05) : 830 - 838