Sensitivity analysis of two inverse methods: Conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing

被引:13
|
作者
Gilquin, L. [1 ]
Bouley, S. [1 ]
Antoni, J. [1 ]
Le Magueresse, T. [2 ]
Marteau, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Lab Vibrat Acoust, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
[2] MicrodB, 28 Chemin Petit Bois, Ecully, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, CNRS UMR 5208, Inst Camille Jordan, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Bayesian focusing; Conventional Beamforming; Inverse methods; Uncertainty quantification; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol' indices; RECONSTRUCTION; REGULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.002
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The characterization of acoustic sources typically involves the retro-propagation of the acoustic field measured with a microphone array to a mesh of the surface of interest, which amounts to solve an inverse problem. Such an inverse problem is built on the basis of a forward model prone to uncertainties arising from mismatches with the physics of the experiment. Assessing the effects of these unavoidable uncertainties on the resolution of the inverse problem represents a challenge. The present paper introduces a practical solution to measure these effects by conducting a sensitivity analysis. The latter provides a mean to identify and rank the main sources of uncertainty through the estimation of sensitivity indices. Two inverse methods are investigated through the sensitivity analysis: conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing. The propagation of uncertainties is carried on numerically. The consistency between the real experiment and its numerical simulation is assessed by means of a small batch of measurements performed in a semi-anechoic chamber. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 202
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Kernel Methods for Bayesian Elliptic Inverse Problems on Manifolds
    Harlim, John
    Sanz-Alonso, Daniel
    Yang, Ruiyi
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2020, 8 (04): : 1414 - 1445
  • [32] Sequential Implicit Sampling Methods for Bayesian Inverse Problems
    Su, Chen
    Tu, Xuemin
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 5 (01): : 519 - 539
  • [33] BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS IN INVERSE PROBLEMS
    FITZPATRICK, BG
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 1991, 7 (05) : 675 - 702
  • [34] Analysis Of Conventional Methods Of Diagnosis In Pulmonary Tuberculosis: What Is Its Sensitivity And Specificity?
    Palma, I. V.
    Aguirre, A. R.
    Rolando, L.
    Nastro, M.
    Kempf, N.
    Limongi, L.
    Putruele, A. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 181
  • [35] BAYESIAN MODELING AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    SKENE, AM
    SHAW, JEH
    LEE, TD
    STATISTICIAN, 1986, 35 (02): : 281 - 288
  • [36] Sensitivity Analysis of a Bayesian Network
    Li, Chenzhao
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [37] BAYESIAN ESTIMATION - SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
    CANAVOS, GC
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1975, 22 (03) : 543 - 552
  • [38] Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis: Be a Bayesian
    Boshuizen, Hendriek C.
    van Baal, Pieter H. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) : 1210 - 1214
  • [39] An approach to Bayesian sensitivity analysis
    Weiss, R
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1996, 58 (04): : 739 - 750
  • [40] Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian networks
    Jensen, FV
    Aldenryd, SH
    Jensen, KB
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING AND UNCERTAINTY, 1995, 946 : 243 - 250