Sensitivity analysis of two inverse methods: Conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing

被引:13
|
作者
Gilquin, L. [1 ]
Bouley, S. [1 ]
Antoni, J. [1 ]
Le Magueresse, T. [2 ]
Marteau, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Lab Vibrat Acoust, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
[2] MicrodB, 28 Chemin Petit Bois, Ecully, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, CNRS UMR 5208, Inst Camille Jordan, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Bayesian focusing; Conventional Beamforming; Inverse methods; Uncertainty quantification; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol' indices; RECONSTRUCTION; REGULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.002
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The characterization of acoustic sources typically involves the retro-propagation of the acoustic field measured with a microphone array to a mesh of the surface of interest, which amounts to solve an inverse problem. Such an inverse problem is built on the basis of a forward model prone to uncertainties arising from mismatches with the physics of the experiment. Assessing the effects of these unavoidable uncertainties on the resolution of the inverse problem represents a challenge. The present paper introduces a practical solution to measure these effects by conducting a sensitivity analysis. The latter provides a mean to identify and rank the main sources of uncertainty through the estimation of sensitivity indices. Two inverse methods are investigated through the sensitivity analysis: conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing. The propagation of uncertainties is carried on numerically. The consistency between the real experiment and its numerical simulation is assessed by means of a small batch of measurements performed in a semi-anechoic chamber. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 202
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The acoustic inverse problem in the inhomogeneous medium by iterative Bayesian focusing algorithm
    Guo, Qixin
    Yu, Liang
    Wang, Ran
    Wang, Rui
    Jiang, Weikang
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 198
  • [22] Sensitivity of conventional methods for bilirubin measurements
    Slaughter, MR
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1996, 127 (02): : 233 - 233
  • [23] Seismoelectric beamforming imaging: a sensitivity analysis
    El Khoury, P.
    Revil, A.
    Sava, P.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 201 (03) : 1781 - 1800
  • [24] Inverse methods in two-dimensional NMR spectral analysis
    van Beek, JD
    Meier, BH
    Schäfer, H
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2003, 162 (01) : 141 - 157
  • [25] Comparison of Two Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Compressor Blades
    Schmidt, Robin
    Voigt, Matthias
    Vogeler, Konrad
    Meyer, Marcus
    JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2017, 139 (11):
  • [26] Two methods of sensitivity analysis for multibody systems with collisions
    Schulz, M
    Brauchli, H
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2000, 35 (10) : 1345 - 1365
  • [27] A comparison of two sampling methods for global sensitivity analysis
    Tarantola, Stefano
    Becker, William
    Zeitz, Dirk
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 183 (05) : 1061 - 1072
  • [28] Alternative Sensitivity Methods for Inverse Radiation Problems in a Two-Dimensional Cylindrical Enclosure
    Kim, Ki Wan
    Baek, Seung Wook
    NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART B-FUNDAMENTALS, 2009, 55 (05) : 361 - 378
  • [29] COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF COMPRESSOR BLADES
    Schmidt, Robin
    Voigt, Matthias
    Vogeler, Konrad
    Meyer, Marcus
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 7B, 2016,
  • [30] Unified framework for two robust beamforming methods
    Liu, H
    Liao, G
    Xie, Y
    Zhang, J
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 2006, 42 (07) : 425 - 426