Sensitivity analysis of two inverse methods: Conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing

被引:13
|
作者
Gilquin, L. [1 ]
Bouley, S. [1 ]
Antoni, J. [1 ]
Le Magueresse, T. [2 ]
Marteau, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, INSA Lyon, Lab Vibrat Acoust, F-69621 Villeurbanne, France
[2] MicrodB, 28 Chemin Petit Bois, Ecully, France
[3] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, CNRS UMR 5208, Inst Camille Jordan, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Bayesian focusing; Conventional Beamforming; Inverse methods; Uncertainty quantification; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol' indices; RECONSTRUCTION; REGULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.002
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The characterization of acoustic sources typically involves the retro-propagation of the acoustic field measured with a microphone array to a mesh of the surface of interest, which amounts to solve an inverse problem. Such an inverse problem is built on the basis of a forward model prone to uncertainties arising from mismatches with the physics of the experiment. Assessing the effects of these unavoidable uncertainties on the resolution of the inverse problem represents a challenge. The present paper introduces a practical solution to measure these effects by conducting a sensitivity analysis. The latter provides a mean to identify and rank the main sources of uncertainty through the estimation of sensitivity indices. Two inverse methods are investigated through the sensitivity analysis: conventional Beamforming and Bayesian focusing. The propagation of uncertainties is carried on numerically. The consistency between the real experiment and its numerical simulation is assessed by means of a small batch of measurements performed in a semi-anechoic chamber. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 202
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing two focusing methods for microwave hyperthermia beamforming
    Iero, Domenica A. M.
    Crocco, Lorenzo
    Isernia, Tommaso
    2013 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2013, : 2917 - +
  • [2] Bayesian Focusing for Coherent Wideband Beamforming
    Bucris, Yaakov
    Cohen, Israel
    Doron, Miriam A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 20 (04): : 1282 - 1296
  • [3] Robust auto-focusing wedeband Bayesian beamforming
    Yu, Tao
    Hansen, John H. L.
    2008 HANDS-FREE SPEECH COMMUNICATION AND MICROPHONE ARRAYS, 2008, : 62 - 65
  • [5] Sensitivity and inverse analysis methods for parameter intervals
    Shao, Guojian
    Su, Jingbo
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 2 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [6] Bayesian evaluation of two conventional diagnostic methods for pathogenic fungal infections
    Sahu, Mahesh C.
    Padhy, Rabindra N.
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE MEDICINE, 2014, 4 (03) : 109 - 119
  • [7] Sensitivity Analysis of Pit Characterization Using Inverse Methods
    Aldrin, John C.
    Sabbagh, Harold A.
    Murphy, R. Kim
    Sabbagh, Elias H.
    ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (XIII), 2010, 33 : 121 - 128
  • [8] Bayesian focusing: a unified approach to inverse acoustic radiation
    Antoni, J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISMA2010 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING INCLUDING USD2010, 2010, : 35 - 45
  • [9] Revisiting Beamforming Under the Prism of Inverse Methods
    Valagiannopoulos, Constantinos
    Kovanis, Vassilios
    PHYSICS AND SIMULATION OF OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES XXVII, 2019, 10912
  • [10] HYPER-DIFFERENTIAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR NONLINEAR BAYESIAN INVERSE PROBLEMS
    Sunseri, Isaac
    Alexanderian, Alen
    Hart, Joseph
    Waanders, Bart van Bloemen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2024, 14 (02) : 1 - 20