Market Reaction to Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure

被引:200
|
作者
Grewal, Jody [1 ]
Riedl, Edward J. [2 ]
Serafeim, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard Business Sch, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
event study; ESG reporting; international; nonfinancial disclosure; sustainability; environmental; social responsibility; governance; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; CORPORATE DISCLOSURE; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2018.3099
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We examine the equity market reaction to events associated with the passage of a directive in the European Union (EU) mandating increased nonfinancial disclosure. These disclosures relate to firms' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, and would be applicable to firms listed on EU exchanges or with significant operations in the EU. We predict and find (i) an average negative market reaction of -0.79% across all firms, (ii) a less negative market reaction for firms having higher predirective nonfinancial performance, and (iii) a less negative reaction for firms having higher predirective nonfinancial disclosure levels. In addition, results are accentuated for firms having the most material ESG issues, as well as investors anticipating proprietary and political costs as a result of the mandated disclosures. Finally, we find that the negative market reaction is concentrated in firms with weak preregulation ESG performance and disclosure, which exhibit an average return of -1.54%; in contrast, firms with strong preregulation disclosure and performance exhibit an average positive return of 0.52%. Overall, the results are consistent with the equity market perceiving net costs (benefits) for firms with weak (strong) nonfinancial performance and disclosure around key events surrounding the mandatory disclosure regulation of nonfinancial information.
引用
收藏
页码:3061 / 3084
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effect of Mandatory Disclosure on Market Inefficiencies: Evidence from FASB Statement No. 161
    Campbell, John L.
    Khan, Urooj
    Pierce, Spencer
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 96 (02): : 153 - 176
  • [32] Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: International Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure
    Dhaliwal, Dan S.
    Radhakrishnan, Suresh
    Tsang, Albert
    Yang, Yong George
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (03): : 723 - 759
  • [33] UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MANDATORY DISCLOSURE
    ISSACHAROFF, S
    LOEWENSTEIN, G
    TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1995, 73 (04) : 753 - 786
  • [34] Voluntary versus mandatory disclosure
    Bertomeu, Jeremy
    Vaysman, Igor
    Xue, Wenjie
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2021, 26 (02) : 658 - 692
  • [35] Mandatory disclosure and financial contagion
    Alvarez, Fernando
    Barlevy, Gadi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2021, 194
  • [36] Mandatory Disclosure and Medical Paternalism
    Emma C. Bullock
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2016, 19 : 409 - 424
  • [37] Mandatory disclosure of HIV status
    English, V
    Mussell, R
    Sheather, J
    Sommerville, A
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2005, 31 (06) : 371 - 371
  • [38] Mandatory Disclosure and Medical Paternalism
    Bullock, Emma C.
    ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2016, 19 (02) : 409 - 424
  • [39] Mandatory disclosure: A behavioral analysis
    Bainbridge, SM
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2000, 68 (04) : 1023 - 1060
  • [40] MANDATORY DISCLOSURE AND THE PROTECTION OF INVESTORS
    EASTERBROOK, FH
    FISCHEL, DR
    VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1984, 70 (04) : 669 - 715