Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization

被引:47
|
作者
Yoshinaga, H
Nakahori, T
Ohtsuka, Y
Oka, E
Kitamura, Y
Kiriyama, H
Kinugasa, K
Miyamoto, K
Hoshida, T
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Sch Med, Dept Child Neurol, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Ryogo Ctr, Okayama, Japan
[3] Real Neurotechnol Co, Toyama, Japan
[4] Nara Med Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Nara, Japan
关键词
MEG; EEG; localization-related epilepsy; dipole;
D O I
10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.42901.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In this study, we tried to show that EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are clinically complementary to each other and that a combination of both technologies is useful for the precise diagnosis of epileptic focus. Methods: We recorded EEGs and MEGs simultaneously and analyzed dipoles in seven patients with intractable localization-related epilepsy. MEG dipoles were analyzed by using a BTI Magnes 148-channel magnetometer. EEG dipoles were analyzed by using a realistically shaped four-layered head model (scalp-skull-fluid-brain) built from 2.0-mm slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Results: (a) In two of seven patients, MEG could not detect any epileptiform discharges, whereas EEG showed clear spikes. However, dipoles estimated from the MEG data corresponding to the early phase of EEG spikes clustered at a location close to that of the EEG-detected dipole. (b) In two of seven patients, EEG showed only intermittent high-voltage slow waves (HVSs) without definite spikes. However, MEG showed clear epileptiform discharges preceding these EEG-detected HVSs. Dipoles estimated for these EEG-detected HVSs were located at a location close to that of the MEG-detected dipoles. (c) Based on the agreement of the results of these two techniques, surgical resection was performed in one patient with good results. Conclusions: Dipole modeling of epileptiform activity by MEG and EEG sometimes provides information not obtainable with either modality used alone.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 928
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap
    Darvas, F
    Rautiainen, M
    Baillet, S
    Ossadtchi, A
    Mosher, JC
    Leahy, RM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE WORKSHOP ON STATISTICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2003, : 282 - 285
  • [32] Dipole source localization of MEG by BP neural networks
    Kinouchi, Y
    Ohara, G
    Nagashino, H
    Soga, T
    Shichijo, F
    Matsumoto, K
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 1996, 8 (03) : 317 - 321
  • [33] Multi dipole source identification from EEG/MEG topography
    Li, ZM
    Bai, XX
    Zhang, QY
    Akutagawa, M
    Shichijo, F
    Kinouchi, Y
    Abeyratne, UR
    2004 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND VISION, VOLS 1-3, 2004, : 953 - 957
  • [34] Dipole location and moment of MEG spikes with and without EEG spikes
    Park, Y
    Nakasato, N
    Yoshimoto, T
    EPILEPSIA, 2003, 44 : 181 - 181
  • [35] Estimation of propagating dipole sources by EEG/MEG sensor arrays
    Nehorai, A
    Dogandzic, A
    CONFERENCE RECORD OF THE THIRTY-SECOND ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS & COMPUTERS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 304 - 308
  • [36] Dipole modeling of interictal and ictal EEG and MEG paroxysms.
    Merlet, I
    EPILEPTIC DISORDERS, 2001, 3 : s11 - s35
  • [37] A study on the simultaneous recording of EEG and fMRI
    Yamamoto, R
    Atsumi, Y
    Tamaki, M
    Takahashi, K
    Shiotsuka, S
    Igawa, R
    Matsuura, R
    Matsuda, T
    Ohkubo, T
    Ohkubo, H
    Kojima, T
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S54 - S54
  • [38] MEG and EEG dipole clusters from extended cortical sources
    Fuchs M.
    Kastner J.
    Tech R.
    Wagner M.
    Gasca F.
    Biomedical Engineering Letters, 2017, 7 (3) : 185 - 191
  • [39] Relative Yield of MEG and EEG Spikes in Simultaneous Recordings
    Ebersole, John S.
    Wagner, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (06) : 443 - 453
  • [40] Superadditive information from simultaneous MEG/EEG data
    Pflieger, ME
    Simpson, GV
    Ahlfors, SP
    Ilmoniemi, RJ
    BIOMAG 96: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMAGNETISM, VOLS I & II, 2000, : 1154 - 1157