Distance matters! The role of employees' age distance on the effects of workforce age heterogeneity on firm performance

被引:13
|
作者
De Meulenaere, Kim [1 ]
Kunze, Florian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Management, Fac Business & Econ, Prinsstr 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Konstanz, Org Studies, Constance, Germany
关键词
age distance; age heterogeneity; firm performance; inter-age cooperative contact; inter-age knowledge exchange; DEMOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY; LABOR PRODUCTIVITY; LEVEL DIVERSITY; TEAM DIVERSITY; WORKPLACE; MODEL; FAULTLINES; CLIMATE; DISCRIMINATION; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/hrm.22031
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Age heterogeneity in Western workforces is increasing, generating potential informational benefits as well as harmful age-based social categorizations. When can firms benefit from age heterogeneity? Building on the categorization-elaboration model, we propose the average age distance between employees as a fundamental contingency. Using a longitudinal archival sample of 3,336 Belgian firms (2012-2015), we find that firms with a high level of age heterogeneity are less productive when employees' average distance is great (Study 1). Through an online experiment with 260 US participants, we show that employees in age-heterogeneous workforces are less willing to engage in inter-age cooperative contact and knowledge exchange under a great level of average age distance (Study 2). Our findings support that great distances foster age-based social categorizations that undermine the productive information elaborations between employees of different ages. This broadens our knowledge on the implications of workforce age diversity and helps organizations understandwhenthey can(not) reap the productivity benefits of their age-diverse workforce. Moreover, this study's theory and implications are relevant to other types of diversity for which both heterogeneity and distance are meaningful constructs. We also discuss the practical implications of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 516
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age Secondary Distance Indicators
    Czerny, Bozena
    Beaton, Rachael
    Bejger, Michal
    Cackett, Edward
    Dall'Ora, Massimo
    Holanda, R. F. L.
    Jensen, Joseph B.
    Jha, Saurabh W.
    Lusso, Elisabeta
    Minezaki, Takeo
    Risaliti, Guido
    Salaris, Maurizio
    Toonen, Silvia
    Yoshii, Yuzuru
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2018, 214 (01)
  • [22] Distance comparisons in virtual reality: effects of path, context, and age
    van der Ham, Ineke J. M.
    Baalbergen, Heleen
    van der Heijden, Peter G. M.
    Postma, Albert
    Braspenning, Merel
    van der Kuil, Milan N. A.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [23] Physically Active Commuting to School: The Effects of Age, Distance, and Season
    Kallio, Jouni
    Turpeinen, Salla
    Hakonen, Harto
    Tammelin, Tuija
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2014, 11 : S159 - S159
  • [24] THE EFFECTS OF DAILY DRIVEN DISTANCE AND AGE FACTOR ON THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
    Kalyoncuoglu, Figen S.
    Tigdemir, Mesut
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2014, 26 (03): : 201 - 207
  • [25] The effects of age and set size on the fast extraction of egocentric distance
    Gajewski, Daniel A.
    Wallin, Courtney P.
    Philbeck, John W.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2015, 23 (08) : 957 - 988
  • [26] AGE BY DISTANCE EFFECTS IN RUNNING AND SWIMMING RECORDS - A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY
    STONES, MJ
    KOZMA, A
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 1986, 12 (04) : 203 - 206
  • [27] Does anogenital distance change with age?
    Toprak, Tuncay
    Tokat, Eda
    ANDROLOGIA, 2019, 51 (11)
  • [28] The Age of Distance: On an Ancient Hand Gesture
    Baracchi, Claudia
    RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY, 2022, 52 (02) : 261 - 272
  • [29] The relationship between anogenital distance and age
    Eisenberg, M. L.
    Hsieh, T. -C.
    Lipshultz, L. I.
    ANDROLOGY, 2013, 1 (01) : 90 - 93
  • [30] FACTORS OF AGE AND INTERPUPILLARY DISTANCE IN STEREOACUITY
    JANI, SN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPTOMETRY, 1967, 44 (10): : 668 - &