The effects of age and set size on the fast extraction of egocentric distance

被引:5
|
作者
Gajewski, Daniel A. [1 ]
Wallin, Courtney P. [1 ]
Philbeck, John W. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Distance perception; aging; visual working memory; angular declination; blind walking; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; TIME-COURSE; ANGULAR DECLINATION; RELATIVE DISTANCE; WORKING-MEMORY; INTRINSIC BIAS; PERCEPTION; IDENTIFICATION; INFORMATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2015.1132803
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Angular direction is a source of information about the distance to floor-level objects that can be extracted from brief glimpses (near one's threshold for detection). Age and set size are two factors known to impact the viewing time needed to directionally localize an object, and these were posited to similarly govern the extraction of distance. The question here was whether viewing durations sufficient to support object detection (controlled for age and set size) would also be sufficient to support well-constrained judgments of distance. Regardless of viewing duration, distance judgments were more accurate (less biased towards underestimation) when multiple potential targets were presented, suggesting that the relative angular declinations between the objects are an additional source of useful information. Distance judgments were more precise with additional viewing time, but the benefit did not depend on set size and accuracy did not improve with longer viewing durations. The overall pattern suggests that distance can be efficiently derived from direction for floor-level objects. Controlling for age-related differences in the viewing time needed to support detection was sufficient to support distal localization but only when brief and longer glimpse trials were interspersed. Information extracted from longer glimpse trials presumably supported performance on subsequent trials when viewing time was more limited. This outcome suggests a particularly important role for prior visual experience in distance judgments for older observers.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 988
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Roles for Prior Visual Experience and Age on the Extraction of Egocentric Distance
    Wallin, Courtney P.
    Gajewski, Daniel A.
    Teplitz, Rebeca W.
    Jaidzeka, Sandra Mihelic
    Philbeck, John W.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2017, 72 (01): : 91 - 99
  • [2] EFFECT OF SET ON PERCEIVED EGOCENTRIC DISTANCE
    GOGEL, WC
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1968, 28 (03) : 283 - &
  • [3] Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance
    Gajewski, Daniel A.
    Wallin, Courtney P.
    Philbeck, John W.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2014, 76 (06) : 1739 - 1751
  • [4] Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance
    Daniel A. Gajewski
    Courtney P. Wallin
    John W. Philbeck
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2014, 76 : 1739 - 1751
  • [5] Counting distance: Effects of egocentric distance on numerical perception
    Gronau, Nurit
    Izoutcheev, Anna
    Nave, Tsafnat
    Henik, Avishai
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [6] EFFECTS OF POSTHYPNOTIC SUGGESTION ON PERCEIVED EGOCENTRIC DISTANCE
    MACCRACKEN, PJ
    GOGEL, WC
    BLUM, GS
    PERCEPTION, 1980, 9 (05) : 561 - 568
  • [7] Auditory and Visual Contribution to Egocentric Distance and Room Size Perception
    Maempel, Hans-Joachim
    Jentsch, Matthias
    BUILDING ACOUSTICS, 2013, 20 (04) : 383 - 401
  • [8] The Effects of Prism Adaptation on Egocentric Metric Distance Estimation
    Colombo, Allyson R.
    Jones, Keith S.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2014, 56 (03) : 605 - 615
  • [9] Effects of Field of View on Egocentric Distance Perception in Virtual Reality
    Masnadi, Sina
    Pfeil, Kevin P.
    Sera-Josef, Jose-Valentin T.
    LaViola, Joseph J., Jr.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22), 2022,
  • [10] Egocentric and allocentric search: effects of platform distance and environmental cues
    Carolina Tamara
    Joseph Leffel
    William Timberlake
    Animal Cognition, 2010, 13 : 565 - 581