Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of haematological malignancies according to international quality standards: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chakraborty, Rajshekhar [1 ]
Cannella, Laura [2 ]
Cottone, Francesco [2 ]
Efficace, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Italian Grp Adult Hematol Dis, Data Ctr & Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy
来源
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY | 2020年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; ACUTE PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; LOW-DOSE DEXAMETHASONE; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA; OF-LIFE DATA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints are increasingly considered for inclusion in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with haematological malignancies. The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the quality of PRO reporting across these RCTs. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed for English language articles published between Jan 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019. Eligible articles were RCTs of cancer-directed therapy in adult patients with haematological malignancies that reported on PRO measures in the primary publication or in a subsequent publication, with a comparison of PROs among treatment groups. A total of 3678 records were assessed, and 71 RCTs, enrolling 24 701 patients, were included in our systematic review. Most RCTs (n=65 [92%]) had PRO measures as a secondary or exploratory endpoint. A PRO hypothesis and relevant PRO domains were specified in 36 (51%) RCTs. Statistical approaches for dealing with missing data were documented in 26 (37%) RCTs. Quality of PRO reporting was higher in RCTs citing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement-PRO extension (CONSORT-PRO) than in those not citing this checklist, as evidenced by the International Society for Quality of Life Research score (median score in studies citing the CONSORT-PRO extension [n=4] was 89 [IQR 75-94] vs 61 [44-78] in those not citing this extension). Independent factors significantly associated with higher reporting included having PROs as a primary endpoint (p=0.008) and the presence of a subsequent publication on PROs (p<0.0001). International guidelines for designing, reporting, and analysing PRO data are now available to further improve overall study quality. Our findings can help investigators to focus on key aspects most in need of attention when reporting PROs in future trials of haematological malignancies.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 901
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Statistical analysis of patient-reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review
    Pe, Madeline
    Dorme, Lien
    Coens, Corneel
    Basch, Ethan
    Calvert, Melanie
    Campbell, Alicyn
    Cleeland, Charles
    Cocks, Kim
    Collette, Laurence
    Dirven, Linda
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Devlin, Nancy
    Flechtner, Hans-Henning
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Griebsch, Ingolf
    Groenvold, Mogens
    King, Madeleine
    Koller, Michael
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Musoro, Jammbe Z.
    Oliver, Kathy
    Piault-Louis, Elisabeth
    Piccart, Martine
    Pimentel, Francisco L.
    Quinten, Chantal
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Sloan, Jeff
    Velikova, Galina
    Bottomley, Andrew
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (09): : E459 - E469
  • [42] Machine learning models including patient-reported outcome data in oncology: a systematic literature review and analysis of their reporting quality
    Krepper, Daniela
    Cesari, Matteo
    Hubel, Niclas J.
    Zelger, Philipp
    Sztankay, Monika J.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [43] Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes from international randomised clinical trials on cancer: a systematic review
    Mierzynska, Justyna
    Piccinin, Claire
    Pe, Madeline
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Coens, Corneel
    Mauer, Murielle
    Eggermont, Alexander
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Bjordal, Kristin
    Reijneveld, Jaap
    Velikova, Galina
    Bottomley, Andrew
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (12): : E685 - E698
  • [44] Sickle Cell Disease and Quality of Life: An Evaluation of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
    Renner, Abbey
    Love, Mitchell
    Garrett, Elizabeth
    Douglas, Alexander
    Kee, Micah
    Heigle, Benjamin
    Wise, Audrey
    Ottwell, Ryan
    Hartwell, Micah
    Vassar, Matt
    HEMOGLOBIN, 2022, 46 (05) : 265 - 268
  • [45] Patient-reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials evaluating BRAF inhibitors in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a systematic scoping review of quality of reporting and trial results
    Al-Naesan, Imad
    Krepper, Daniela
    Sparano, Francesco
    Sztankay, Monika
    Efficace, Fabio
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2025, 35 (02) : 77 - 86
  • [46] The Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Quality of Life in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Li, Yifan
    Hung, Vivian
    Ho, Kevin
    Kavalieratos, Dio
    Warda, Nahrain
    Zimmermann, Camilla
    Quinn, Kieran
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (04) : 545 - 562
  • [47] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    Rothman, Russell L.
    Geiger, Timothy M.
    Canedo, Juan R.
    Edwards-Hollingsworth, Kamren
    LaNeve, David C.
    Penson, David F.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (08) : 1156 - 1167
  • [48] Reporting quality of randomised-controlled trials in robotic versus laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review
    Nandakumar, Madura
    Light, Alexander
    Burrows, Abigail
    Gupta, Tanya
    Daniel, Allen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 89 - 90
  • [49] Quality of Patient-Reported Outcome Studies Utilizing the BREAST-Q: A Systematic Review
    Har-Shai, Lior
    Ofek, Sar-El
    Brandstetter, Addy
    Cohen, Keren H.
    Shay, Tamir
    Amir, Avraham
    Ad-El, Dean D.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 41 (11) : NP1448 - NP1458
  • [50] Reporting Quality of Randomised-Controlled Trials in Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Gupta, T.
    Light, A.
    Burrows, A.
    Daniel, A.
    Dadabhoy, M.
    Karthikeyan, S.
    Nandakumar, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 165 - 165