Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of haematological malignancies according to international quality standards: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chakraborty, Rajshekhar [1 ]
Cannella, Laura [2 ]
Cottone, Francesco [2 ]
Efficace, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Italian Grp Adult Hematol Dis, Data Ctr & Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy
来源
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY | 2020年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; ACUTE PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; LOW-DOSE DEXAMETHASONE; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA; OF-LIFE DATA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints are increasingly considered for inclusion in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with haematological malignancies. The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the quality of PRO reporting across these RCTs. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed for English language articles published between Jan 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019. Eligible articles were RCTs of cancer-directed therapy in adult patients with haematological malignancies that reported on PRO measures in the primary publication or in a subsequent publication, with a comparison of PROs among treatment groups. A total of 3678 records were assessed, and 71 RCTs, enrolling 24 701 patients, were included in our systematic review. Most RCTs (n=65 [92%]) had PRO measures as a secondary or exploratory endpoint. A PRO hypothesis and relevant PRO domains were specified in 36 (51%) RCTs. Statistical approaches for dealing with missing data were documented in 26 (37%) RCTs. Quality of PRO reporting was higher in RCTs citing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement-PRO extension (CONSORT-PRO) than in those not citing this checklist, as evidenced by the International Society for Quality of Life Research score (median score in studies citing the CONSORT-PRO extension [n=4] was 89 [IQR 75-94] vs 61 [44-78] in those not citing this extension). Independent factors significantly associated with higher reporting included having PROs as a primary endpoint (p=0.008) and the presence of a subsequent publication on PROs (p<0.0001). International guidelines for designing, reporting, and analysing PRO data are now available to further improve overall study quality. Our findings can help investigators to focus on key aspects most in need of attention when reporting PROs in future trials of haematological malignancies.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 901
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review
    Yao, A. C.
    Khajuria, A.
    Camm, C. F.
    Edison, E.
    Agha, R.
    EYE, 2014, 28 (11) : 1341 - 1349
  • [32] A systematic evaluation of compliance and reporting of patient-reported outcome endpoints in ovarian cancer randomised controlled trials: Implications for generalisability and clinical practice
    Mercieca-Bebber R.
    Friedlander M.
    Calvert M.
    Stockler M.
    Kyte D.
    Kok P.-S.
    King M.T.
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1 (1)
  • [33] Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomised controlled trials in diabetes and pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review
    Newman, Christine
    Kgosidialwa, Oratile
    Dervan, Louise
    Bogdanet, Delia
    Egan, Aoife Maria
    Biesty, Linda
    Devane, Declan
    O'Shea, Paula M.
    Dunne, Fidelma
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [34] Inclusion of older patients with cancer in randomised controlled trials with patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review
    Sparano, Francesco
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.
    Fayers, Peter
    Pusic, Andrea
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Cottone, Francesco
    Rees, Jonathan
    Pezold, Mike
    Anota, Amelie
    Charton, Emilie
    Vignetti, Marco
    Wan, Chonghua
    Blazeby, Jane
    Efficace, Fabio
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (04) : 451 - 463
  • [35] Quality and reporting of patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients with hip fracture: a systematic review
    van der Vet, Puck
    Wilson, Sandra
    Houwert, R. Marijn
    Verleisdonk, Egbert-Jan
    Heng, Marilyn
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [36] Systematic Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Protocol Content and Reporting in Cancer Trials
    Kyte, Derek
    Retzer, Ameeta
    Ahmed, Khaled
    Keeley, Thomas
    Armes, Jo
    Brown, Julia M.
    Calman, Lynn
    Gavin, Anna
    Glaser, Adam W.
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Lanceley, Anne
    Taylor, Rachel M.
    Velikova, Galina
    Brundage, Michael
    Efficace, Fabio
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    King, Madeleine T.
    Turner, Grace
    Calvert, Melanie
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2019, 111 (11): : 1170 - 1178
  • [37] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Blood, Zachary
    Anh Tran
    Caleo, Lauren
    Saw, Robyn
    Dieng, Mbathio
    Shackleton, Mark
    Soyer, H. Peter
    Arnold, Chris
    Mann, Graham J.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [38] Analysing data from patient-reported outcome and quality of life endpoints for cancer clinical trials: a start in setting international standards
    Bottomley, Andrew
    Pe, Madeline
    Sloan, Jeff
    Basch, Ethan
    Bonnetain, Franck
    Calvert, Melanie
    Campbell, Alicyn
    Cleeland, Charles
    Cocks, Kim
    Collette, Laurence
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Devlin, Nancy
    Flechtner, Hans-Henning
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Greimel, Eva
    Griebsch, Ingolf
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Hamel, Jean-Francois
    King, Madeleine
    Kluetz, Paul G.
    Koller, Michael
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Moinpour, Carol M.
    Musoro, Jammbe
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Oliver, Kathy
    Piault-Louis, Elisabeth
    Piccart, Martine
    Pimentel, Francisco L.
    Quinten, Chantal
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Schuermann, Christoph
    Smith, Ashley Wilder
    Soltys, Katherine M.
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Velikova, Galina
    Coens, Corneel
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (11): : E510 - E514
  • [39] A systematic review of reporting standards of assisted vaginal birth randomised controlled trials
    Hotton, E.
    Renwick, S.
    Lenguerrand, E.
    Wade, J.
    Draycott, T.
    Crofts, J.
    Blencowe, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 98 - 98
  • [40] Protocol for a systematic review of reporting standards of anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials
    Elliott, Lucy
    Coulman, Karen
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Qureshi, Mahim
    Watson, Sethina
    Mouton, Ronelle
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):