Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of haematological malignancies according to international quality standards: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Chakraborty, Rajshekhar [1 ]
Cannella, Laura [2 ]
Cottone, Francesco [2 ]
Efficace, Fabio [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Italian Grp Adult Hematol Dis, Data Ctr & Hlth Outcomes Res Unit, I-00161 Rome, Italy
来源
LANCET HAEMATOLOGY | 2020年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; ACUTE PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; LOW-DOSE DEXAMETHASONE; NON-HODGKIN-LYMPHOMA; DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE-MYELOMA; METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; PRIMARY CNS LYMPHOMA; OF-LIFE DATA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints are increasingly considered for inclusion in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with haematological malignancies. The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the quality of PRO reporting across these RCTs. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed for English language articles published between Jan 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019. Eligible articles were RCTs of cancer-directed therapy in adult patients with haematological malignancies that reported on PRO measures in the primary publication or in a subsequent publication, with a comparison of PROs among treatment groups. A total of 3678 records were assessed, and 71 RCTs, enrolling 24 701 patients, were included in our systematic review. Most RCTs (n=65 [92%]) had PRO measures as a secondary or exploratory endpoint. A PRO hypothesis and relevant PRO domains were specified in 36 (51%) RCTs. Statistical approaches for dealing with missing data were documented in 26 (37%) RCTs. Quality of PRO reporting was higher in RCTs citing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement-PRO extension (CONSORT-PRO) than in those not citing this checklist, as evidenced by the International Society for Quality of Life Research score (median score in studies citing the CONSORT-PRO extension [n=4] was 89 [IQR 75-94] vs 61 [44-78] in those not citing this extension). Independent factors significantly associated with higher reporting included having PROs as a primary endpoint (p=0.008) and the presence of a subsequent publication on PROs (p<0.0001). International guidelines for designing, reporting, and analysing PRO data are now available to further improve overall study quality. Our findings can help investigators to focus on key aspects most in need of attention when reporting PROs in future trials of haematological malignancies.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 901
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in trials of diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review
    Newman, Christine
    Kgosidialwa, Oratile
    Dervan, Louise
    Bogdanet, Delia
    Egan, Aoife M.
    Biesty, Linda
    Devane, Declan
    O'Shea, Paula M.
    Dunne, Fidelma P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 : S162 - S162
  • [2] Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in trials of diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
    Newman, C.
    Kgosidialwa, O.
    Dervan, L.
    Bogdanet, D.
    Egan, A. M.
    Biesty, L.
    Devane, D.
    O'Shea, P. M.
    Dunne, F. P.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 188
  • [3] Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in trials of diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review
    Newman, C.
    Kgosidialwa, O.
    Dervan, L.
    Bogdanet, D.
    Egan, A. M.
    Biesty, L.
    Devane, D.
    O'Shea, P. M.
    Dunne, F. P.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 188
  • [4] The level of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of brain tumour patients: A systematic review
    Dirven, Linda
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Blazeby, Jane
    Jacobs, Marc
    Pusic, Andrea
    La Sala, Edoardo
    Stupp, Roger
    Fayers, Peter
    Efficace, Fabio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (14) : 2432 - 2448
  • [5] Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting according to the CONSORT statement in randomized controlled trials with glioblastoma patients
    Garnier, Louis
    Charton, Emilie
    Falcoz, Antoine
    Paget-Bailly, Sophie
    Vernerey, Dewi
    Jary, Marine
    Ducray, Francois
    Curtit, Elsa
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (02) : 148 - 159
  • [6] Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting across cancer randomized controlled trials according to the CONSORT patient-reported outcome extension: A pooled analysis of 557 trials
    Efficace, Fabio
    Fayers, Peter
    Pusic, Andrea
    Cemal, Yeliz
    Yanagawa, Jane
    Jacobs, Marc
    la Sala, Andrea
    Cafaro, Valentina
    Whale, Katie
    Rees, Jonathan
    Blazeby, Jane
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (18) : 3335 - 3342
  • [7] Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of head and neck cancers: a systematic review of reporting quality from the PROMOTION registry
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Perreca, Alessandro
    Macann, Andrew
    King, Madeleine
    Whale, Katie
    Soldati, Salvatore
    Jacobs, Marc
    Efficace, Fabio
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 : 114 - 115
  • [8] International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium
    Coens, Corneel
    Pe, Madeline
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Sloan, Jeff
    Basch, Ethan
    Calvert, Melanie
    Campbell, Alicyn
    Cleeland, Charles
    Cocks, Kim
    Collette, Laurence
    Devlin, Nancy
    Dorme, Lien
    Flechtner, Hans-Henning
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Griebsch, Ingolf
    Groenvold, Mogens
    King, Madeleine
    Kluetz, Paul G.
    Koller, Michael
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Musoro, Jammbe Z.
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Oliver, Kathy
    Piault-Louis, Elisabeth
    Piccart, Martine
    Quinten, Chantal
    Reijneveld, Jaap C.
    Schuermann, Christoph
    Smith, Ashley Wilder
    Soltys, Katherine M.
    Taphoorn, Martin J. B.
    Velikova, Galina
    Bottomley, Andrew
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02): : E83 - E96
  • [9] The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review
    Ntala, Chara
    Birmpili, Panagiota
    Worth, Allison
    Anderson, Niall H.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (04): : 417 - 424
  • [10] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    S. Ishaque
    J. Karnon
    G. Chen
    R. Nair
    A. B. Salter
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 567 - 592