Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages

被引:110
|
作者
Tactacan, G. B. [1 ]
Guenter, W. [1 ]
Lewis, N. J. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Lecompte, J. C. [1 ]
House, J. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Anim Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
laying hen; cage; bone; production; WHITE LEGHORN HENS; FURNISHED CAGES; BONE STRENGTH; PLASMA-CORTICOSTERONE; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; PLUMAGE CONDITION; HOUSING SYSTEMS; EGG QUALITY; HEALTH; DENSITY;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2008-00369
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Concerns regarding the welfare of laying hens raised in battery cages have led to the development of enriched cages that allow hens to perform natural behaviors including nesting, roosting, and scratching. This study was conducted to compare indices of production and welfare in birds housed in 2 different caging systems. Shaver White hens were housed from 21 to 61 wk in either conventional battery cages (n = 500; 10 cages; 5 hens/cage; floor space = 561.9 cm(2)/hen) or enriched cages (n = 480; 2 cages; 24 hens/cage; floor space = 642.6 cm(2)/hen) and were replicated 10 times. Enriched cages provided hens with a curtained nesting area, scratch pad, and perches. Production parameters and egg quality measures were recorded throughout the experiment. Plumage condition was evaluated at 37 and 61 wk. Bone quality traits and immunological response parameters were measured at 61 wk, and 59 and 61 wk, respectively. Hen-day egg production, feed consumption, egg weight, and percentage of cumulative mortality of laying hens were not affected by the cage designs. Specific gravity and the percentage of cracked and soft-shelled eggs were also similar between the 2 housing systems. The incidence of dirty eggs was, however, significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in enriched cages than in conventional cages. Feather scores were similar between birds except for the wing region, which was higher (P < 0.05) for hens housed in conventional cages. Bone quality measures tended to be higher for hens housed in enriched cages compared with hens in conventional cages. However, the increase was significant only for bone mineral density. Immunological response parameters did not reveal statistically significant differences. Overall, laying performance, exterior egg quality measures, plumage condition, and immunological response parameters appear to be similar for hens housed in the 2 cage systems tested. Enrichment of laying hen cages resulted in better bone quality, which could have resulted from increased activity.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 707
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of an enriched laying environment on welfare, performance, and egg quality parameters of laying hens kept in a cage system
    Konkol, Damian
    Popiela, Ewa
    Korczynski, Mariusz
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (08) : 3771 - 3776
  • [32] Bacterial eggshell contamination in conventional cages, furnished cages and aviary housing systems for laying hens
    De Reu, K
    Grijspeerdt, K
    Heyndrickx, M
    Zoons, J
    De Baere, K
    Uyttendaele, M
    Debevere, J
    Herman, L
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2005, 46 (02) : 149 - 155
  • [33] Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range)
    Dikmen, B. Yilmaz
    Ipek, A.
    Sahan, U.
    Petek, M.
    Sozcu, A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (07) : 1564 - 1572
  • [34] Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens
    Singh, R.
    Cheng, K. M.
    Silversides, F. G.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 88 (02) : 256 - 264
  • [35] PLUMAGE CONDITION IN SCWL LAYING HENS KEPT IN CONVENTIONAL CAGES OF DIFFERENT DESIGNS
    TAUSON, R
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1984, 34 (02): : 221 - 230
  • [36] Behaviour, health and integument of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages
    Abrahamsson, P
    Tauson, R
    Appleby, MC
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 521 - 540
  • [37] Investigations of laying hen health in enriched cages as compared to conventional cages and a floor pen system
    Weber, RM
    Nogossek, M
    Sander, I
    Wandt, B
    Neumann, U
    Glünder, G
    WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT, 2003, 90 (10): : 257 - 266
  • [38] Laying hen production and welfare in enriched colony cages at different stocking densities
    Weimer, S. L.
    Robison, C. I.
    Tempelman, R. J.
    Jones, D. R.
    Karcher, D. M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 98 (09) : 3578 - 3586
  • [39] Development of furnished cages for laying hens
    Appleby, MC
    Walker, AW
    Nicol, CJ
    Lindberg, AC
    Freire, R
    Hughes, BO
    Elson, HA
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (04) : 489 - 500
  • [40] The future housing of laying hens in cages
    Rauch, HW
    BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 2001, 79 (01): : 140 - 159