Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages

被引:110
|
作者
Tactacan, G. B. [1 ]
Guenter, W. [1 ]
Lewis, N. J. [1 ]
Rodriguez-Lecompte, J. C. [1 ]
House, J. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Anim Sci, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
关键词
laying hen; cage; bone; production; WHITE LEGHORN HENS; FURNISHED CAGES; BONE STRENGTH; PLASMA-CORTICOSTERONE; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES; PLUMAGE CONDITION; HOUSING SYSTEMS; EGG QUALITY; HEALTH; DENSITY;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2008-00369
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Concerns regarding the welfare of laying hens raised in battery cages have led to the development of enriched cages that allow hens to perform natural behaviors including nesting, roosting, and scratching. This study was conducted to compare indices of production and welfare in birds housed in 2 different caging systems. Shaver White hens were housed from 21 to 61 wk in either conventional battery cages (n = 500; 10 cages; 5 hens/cage; floor space = 561.9 cm(2)/hen) or enriched cages (n = 480; 2 cages; 24 hens/cage; floor space = 642.6 cm(2)/hen) and were replicated 10 times. Enriched cages provided hens with a curtained nesting area, scratch pad, and perches. Production parameters and egg quality measures were recorded throughout the experiment. Plumage condition was evaluated at 37 and 61 wk. Bone quality traits and immunological response parameters were measured at 61 wk, and 59 and 61 wk, respectively. Hen-day egg production, feed consumption, egg weight, and percentage of cumulative mortality of laying hens were not affected by the cage designs. Specific gravity and the percentage of cracked and soft-shelled eggs were also similar between the 2 housing systems. The incidence of dirty eggs was, however, significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in enriched cages than in conventional cages. Feather scores were similar between birds except for the wing region, which was higher (P < 0.05) for hens housed in conventional cages. Bone quality measures tended to be higher for hens housed in enriched cages compared with hens in conventional cages. However, the increase was significant only for bone mineral density. Immunological response parameters did not reveal statistically significant differences. Overall, laying performance, exterior egg quality measures, plumage condition, and immunological response parameters appear to be similar for hens housed in the 2 cage systems tested. Enrichment of laying hen cages resulted in better bone quality, which could have resulted from increased activity.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 707
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenges of the new requirements for welfare of laying hens housed in cages
    Michel, V.
    Guinebretiere, M.
    SUSTAINABLE ANIMAL PRODUCTION: THE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL FARMING, 2009, : 329 - 345
  • [22] Pop hole passages and welfare in furnished cages for laying hens
    Wall, H
    Tauson, R
    Elwinger, K
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [23] Persistence of fecal shedding of Salmonella Enteritidis by experimentally infected laying hens housed in conventional or enriched cages
    Gast, Richard K.
    Guraya, Rupa
    Jones, Deana R.
    Anderson, Kenneth E.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2015, 94 (07) : 1650 - 1656
  • [24] Colonization of internal organs by Salmonella Enteritidis in experimentally infected laying hens housed in conventional or enriched cages
    Gast, Richard K.
    Guraya, Rupa
    Jones, Deana R.
    Anderson, Kenneth E.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2013, 92 (02) : 468 - 473
  • [25] CAGES FOR LAYING HENS
    DUN, P
    HUGHES, BO
    HOWIE, TJ
    MICHIE, W
    SHAMASH, E
    WRIGHT, D
    FARM BUILDING PROGRESS, 1991, (106): : 25 - 27
  • [26] COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE AND EGG QUALITY OF LAYING HENS IN ENRICHED CAGES AND FREE-RANGE SYSTEMS
    Denli, Muzaffer
    Bukun, Bekir
    Tutkun, Muhittin
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES D-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 59 : 29 - 32
  • [27] Keel bone differences in laying hens housed in enriched colony cages
    Chargo, Nicholas J.
    Robison, Cara I.
    Akaeze, Hope O.
    Baker, Sydney L.
    Toscano, Michael J.
    Makagon, Maja M.
    Karcher, Darrin M.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2019, 98 (02) : 1031 - 1036
  • [28] Effect of Environmental Enrichment Within Cages on Production and Welfare in Laying Hens
    Ozenturk, U.
    Uysal, A.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 26 (04)
  • [29] Welfare of laying hens housed in cages and in aviaries: what about fearfulness?
    Colson, Sandra
    Michel, Virginie
    Arnould, Cecile
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2006, 70 (06): : 261 - 269
  • [30] Feed form and perch design do not interact to production performance, gastrointestinal tract traits, behaviour and welfare of laying hens reared in enriched cages
    Tarim, B.
    Demirtas, S. E.
    Bozkurt, M.
    Ustundag, A. O.
    Eray, O.
    Ahlat, O.
    Bayir, H. O.
    Aksit, H.
    Kamanli, S.
    Ozkan, S.
    Yalcin, S.
    Tuzun, A. E.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (02) : 165 - 178