Sit-to-stand test in children with bronchiectasis: Does it measure functional exercise capacity?

被引:6
|
作者
Zeren, Melih [1 ]
Gurses, Hulya Nilgun [2 ]
Kulli, Hilal Denizoglu [2 ]
Ucgun, Hikmet [2 ]
Cakir, Erkan [3 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Silahtaraga St 189, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Chest Dis, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
HEART & LUNG | 2020年 / 49卷 / 06期
关键词
Bronchiectasis; Children; Functional exercise capacity; Physical performance; Sit-to-stand test; Six-minute walk test; Validity; FIELD WALKING TESTS; CYSTIC-FIBROSIS; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; TOLERANCE; STATEMENT; PEOPLE; COPD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Similar to six-minute walk test (6MWT), sit-to-stand test (STST) is a self-paced test which elicits sub-maximal effort; therefore, it is suggested as an alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in various pulmonary conditions including COPD and cystic fibrosis. We aimed to investigate the association between 30-second STST (30s-STST) and 6MWT in both children with bronchiectasis (BE) and their healthy counterparts, as well as exploring cardiorespiratory burden and discriminative properties of both tests. Methods: Sixty children (6 to 18-year-old) diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis BE and 20 age-matched healthy controls were included. Both groups performed 30s-STST and 6MWT. Test results, and heart rate, SpO(2) and dyspnea responses to tests were recorded. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that 30s-STST was able to explain 52% of variance in 6MWT (r = 0.718, p<0.001) in BE group, whereas 20% of variance in healthy controls (r = 0.453, p = 0.045). 6MWT elicited higher changes in heart rate and dyspnea level compared to 30s-STST, indicating it was more physically demanding. Both 30s-STST (21.65 +/- 5.28 vs 26.55 +/- 3.56 repetitions) and 6MWT (538 +/- 85 vs 596 +/- 54 m) were significantly lower in BE group compared to healthy controls (p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the ROC curve (UAC) of 0.765 for 30s-STST and 0.693 for 6MWT in identifying the individuals with or without BE (p<0.05). Comparison between AUCs of 30s-STST and 6MWT yielded no significant difference (p = 0.466), indicating both tests had similar discriminative properties. Conclusions: 30s-STST is found to be a valid alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in chil-dren with BE. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 802
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reference values for the 1-minute sit-to-stand and 5 times sit-to-stand tests to assess functional capacity: a cross-sectional study
    Vilarinho, R.
    Montes, A. Mesquita
    Noites, A.
    Silva, F.
    Melo, C.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2024, 124 : 85 - 92
  • [22] The one-minute sit-to-stand test: A novel tool for assessing functional capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Kutukcu, Ebru Calik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 421
  • [23] The five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5STS) in patients with bronchiectasis: validity and reponsiveness
    Patel, Suhani
    Barker, Ruth
    Walsh, Jessica
    Polgar, Oliver
    Nolan, Claire
    Man, William
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2020, 56
  • [24] A SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS USEFUL TO ASSESS EXERCISE OXYGENATION IN PATIENTS WITH INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE
    Visser, S.
    Piggott, A.
    Spencer, L.
    Alison, J.
    Webster, S.
    Troy, L.
    Hayen, A.
    Torzillo, P.
    Corte, P.
    Corte, T.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 29 - 29
  • [25] Reliability of the sit-to-stand test over dispersed test sessions
    Schaubert, K
    Bohannon, RW
    ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2005, 13 (02) : 119 - 122
  • [26] The Instrumented Sit-to-Stand Test (iSTS) Has Greater Clinical Relevance than the Manually Recorded Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults
    van Lummel, Rob C.
    Walgaard, Stefan
    Maier, Andrea B.
    Ainsworth, Erik
    Beek, Peter J.
    van Dieen, Jaap H.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [27] Reply to the comments on "Five-repetition sit-to-stand test: End with the fifth stand or sit?"
    Yamada, Minoru
    Lim, Jae-Young
    Assantachai, Prasert
    Tanaka, Tomoki
    Kim, Miji
    Lee, Sang Yoon
    Lim, Wee-Shiong
    Arai, Hidenori
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 22 (07) : 539 - 540
  • [28] Sit-to-Stand Test for Neurodegenerative Diseases Video Classification
    Convertini, Nicola
    Dentamaro, Vincenzo
    Impedovo, Donato
    Pirlo, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 (12)
  • [29] The reliability and validity of the 30-seconds sit-to-stand test and its capacity for assessment of the functional status of hemodialysis patients
    Figueiredo, Pedro Henrique Scheidt
    Veloso, Larissa Raphaela de Souza
    Lima, Marcia Maria Oliveira
    Vieira, Carlos Filipe Delmondes
    Alves, Frederico Lopes
    Lacerda, Ana Cristina Rodrigues
    Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    Rodrigues, Vanessa Gomes Brandao
    Maciel, Emilio Henrique Barroso
    Costa, Henrique Silveira
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 27 : 157 - 164
  • [30] Estimation of Functional Aerobic Capacity Using the Sit-to-Stand Test in Older Adults with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Jose Fuentes-Abolafio, Ivan
    Escriche-Escuder, Adrian
    Rosa Bernal-Lopez, Maria
    Gomez-Huelgas, Ricardo
    Ricci, Michele
    Trinidad-Fernandez, Manuel
    Roldan-Jimenez, Cristina
    Maria Arjona-Caballero, Jose
    Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio
    Miguel Perez-Belmonte, Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)