Sit-to-stand test in children with bronchiectasis: Does it measure functional exercise capacity?

被引:6
|
作者
Zeren, Melih [1 ]
Gurses, Hulya Nilgun [2 ]
Kulli, Hilal Denizoglu [2 ]
Ucgun, Hikmet [2 ]
Cakir, Erkan [3 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Silahtaraga St 189, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Chest Dis, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
HEART & LUNG | 2020年 / 49卷 / 06期
关键词
Bronchiectasis; Children; Functional exercise capacity; Physical performance; Sit-to-stand test; Six-minute walk test; Validity; FIELD WALKING TESTS; CYSTIC-FIBROSIS; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; TOLERANCE; STATEMENT; PEOPLE; COPD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Similar to six-minute walk test (6MWT), sit-to-stand test (STST) is a self-paced test which elicits sub-maximal effort; therefore, it is suggested as an alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in various pulmonary conditions including COPD and cystic fibrosis. We aimed to investigate the association between 30-second STST (30s-STST) and 6MWT in both children with bronchiectasis (BE) and their healthy counterparts, as well as exploring cardiorespiratory burden and discriminative properties of both tests. Methods: Sixty children (6 to 18-year-old) diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis BE and 20 age-matched healthy controls were included. Both groups performed 30s-STST and 6MWT. Test results, and heart rate, SpO(2) and dyspnea responses to tests were recorded. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that 30s-STST was able to explain 52% of variance in 6MWT (r = 0.718, p<0.001) in BE group, whereas 20% of variance in healthy controls (r = 0.453, p = 0.045). 6MWT elicited higher changes in heart rate and dyspnea level compared to 30s-STST, indicating it was more physically demanding. Both 30s-STST (21.65 +/- 5.28 vs 26.55 +/- 3.56 repetitions) and 6MWT (538 +/- 85 vs 596 +/- 54 m) were significantly lower in BE group compared to healthy controls (p<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the ROC curve (UAC) of 0.765 for 30s-STST and 0.693 for 6MWT in identifying the individuals with or without BE (p<0.05). Comparison between AUCs of 30s-STST and 6MWT yielded no significant difference (p = 0.466), indicating both tests had similar discriminative properties. Conclusions: 30s-STST is found to be a valid alternative measurement for functional exercise capacity in chil-dren with BE. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 802
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of sit-to-stand test and sixminute walk test in asthmatic and healthy children
    Kahraman, Buse Ozcan
    Ozsoy, Ismail
    Tanriverdi, Aylin
    Polat, Karya
    Papurcu, Asli
    Sezgin, Nazenin Hande
    Acar, Serap
    Atakul, Gizem
    Uzuner, Nevin
    Asilsoy, Suna
    Karaman, Ozkan
    Savci, Sema
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [12] The one-minute sit-to-stand test: A practical tool for assessing functional exercise capacity in patients with COPD in routine clinical practice
    Mellaerts, Paulien
    Demeyer, Heleen
    Blondeel, Astrid
    Vanhoutte, Tim
    Breuls, Sofie
    Wuyts, Marieke
    Coosemans, Iris
    Claes, Lode
    Vandenbergh, Nele
    Beckers, Kaat
    Bossche, Lucas Vanden
    Stylemans, Dimitri
    Janssens, Wim
    Everaerts, Stephanie
    Troosters, Thierry
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2024, 21
  • [13] One-minute sit-to-stand test for evaluating functional exercise capacity in subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
    Kronberger, C.
    Litschauer, B.
    Dachs, T.
    Rettl, R.
    Ligios, L. Camuz
    Eslam, R. Badr
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2021, 133 (SUPPL 3) : S96 - S97
  • [14] One-minute sit-to-stand test for evaluating functional exercise capacity in subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
    Kronberger, C.
    Litschauer, B.
    Dachs, T.
    Rettl, R.
    Ligios, L. Camuz
    Eslam, R. Badr
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2021, 23 : 271 - 272
  • [15] The chair sit-to-stand test as a measure of leg strength in older adult women
    McCarthy, E
    Horvat, M
    Wisenbaker, J
    Holtsberg, P
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2003, 74 (01) : A78 - A78
  • [16] Five-repetition sit-to-stand test: End with the fifth stand or sit?
    Yamada, Minoru
    Lim, Jae-Young
    Assantachai, Prasert
    Tanaka, Tomoki
    Kim, Miji
    Lee, Sang Yoon
    Lim, Wee-Shiong
    Arai, Hidenori
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 22 (04) : 362 - 364
  • [17] The validation of the sit-to-stand test for COPD patients
    Chambellan, Arnaud
    Nusinovici, Simon
    Vaidya, Trija
    Gourraud, Pierre-Antoine
    de Bisschop, Claire
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 50 (03)
  • [18] The validity of the 5 and 10 sit-to-stand test
    Carling, A.
    Nilsagard, Y.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (04) : 532 - 532
  • [19] Reliability of remote 1-minute sit-to-stand test to measure physical capacity in patients with chronic respiratory diseases
    Larrateguy, Santiago
    Otto-Yanes, Matias
    Bogado, Juan
    Larrateguy, Luis
    Blanco, Isabel
    Gimeno-Santos, Elena
    Torres-Castro, Rodrigo
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [20] A Kinematic Comparison Between Sit-to-Stand Movements and Individual Cycles of the 5-Cycle Sit-to-Stand Test
    Howarth, Samuel J.
    Hum, Rachel
    Ead, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 44 (06) : 487 - 496