Dose variations with varying calculation grid size in head and neck IMRT

被引:52
|
作者
Chung, Heeteak [1 ]
Jin, Hosang
Palta, Jatinder
Suh, Tae-Suk
Kim, Siyong
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Nucl & Radiol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2006年 / 51卷 / 19期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/19/008
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Ever since the advent and development of treatment planning systems, the uncertainty associated with calculation grid size has been an issue. Even to this day, with highly sophisticated 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems (TPS), dose uncertainty due to grid size is still a concern. A phantom simulating head and neck treatment was prepared from two semi-cylindrical solid water slabs and a radiochromic film was inserted between the two slabs for measurement. Plans were generated for a 5400 cGy prescribed dose using Philips Pinnacle(3) TPS for two targets, one shallow (similar to 0.5 cm depth) and one deep (similar to 6 cm depth). Calculation grid sizes of 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 mm were considered. Three clinical cases were also evaluated. The dose differences for the varying grid sizes ( 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm from 1.5 mm) in the phantom study were 126 cGy (2.3% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription), 248.2 cGy ( 4.6% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription) and 301.8 cGy (5.6% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription), respectively for the shallow target case. It was found that the dose could be varied to about 100 cGy ( 1.9% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription), 148.9 cGy ( 2.8% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription) and 202.9 cGy ( 3.8% of the 5400 cGy dose prescription) for 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm grid sizes, respectively, simply by shifting the calculation grid origin. Dose difference with a different range of the relative dose gradient was evaluated and we found that the relative dose difference increased with an increase in the range of the relative dose gradient. When comparing varying calculation grid sizes and measurements, the variation of the dose difference histogram was insignificant, but a local effect was observed in the dose difference map. Similar results were observed in the case of the deep target and the three clinical cases also showed results comparable to those from the phantom study.
引用
收藏
页码:4841 / 4856
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Geometrical and dosimetric interfractional variations and their correlation in head and neck IG-IMRT
    Stoll, M.
    Giske, K.
    Stoiber, E. M.
    Bendl, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S237 - S238
  • [42] Gross Tumor Volume Size and Oral Cavity Dose Drive Dysphagia in Definitive (Chemo) IMRT for Head and Neck Cancer
    Anderson, N. J.
    Jackson, J.
    Khoo, V.
    Schneider, M.
    Rolfo, M.
    Gan, H.
    Kaegi, K.
    Sneyd, F.
    Joon, D. Lim
    Wada, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S566 - S567
  • [43] Dosimetric effects of dose calculation grid size on the epidural space dose
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Sasaki, Koji
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Aoyama, Takahiro
    Tachibana, Hiroyuki
    Koide, Yutaro
    Iwata, Tohru
    Kitagawa, Tomoki
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [44] THE INFLUENCE OF THE SIZE OF THE GRID USED FOR DOSE CALCULATION ON THE ACCURACY OF DOSE ESTIMATION
    NIEMIERKO, A
    GOITEIN, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (02) : 239 - 247
  • [45] Comparison of analytic source models for head scatter factor calculation and planar dose calculation for IMRT
    Yan, Guanghua
    Liu, Chihray
    Lu, Bo
    Palta, Jatinder R.
    Li, Jonathan G.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (08): : 2051 - 2067
  • [46] Impact of geometric variations on dose distribution during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of head and neck cancer patients.
    Ballivy, O
    Patrocinio, H
    Vuong, T
    Shenouda, G
    Parker, W
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 : S54 - S54
  • [47] Correlation of Brachial Plexus Dose With Gross Tumor Volume in Head and Neck IMRT
    Romesser, P.
    Qureshi, M. M.
    Kovalchuk, N.
    Orlina, L.
    Willins, J. D.
    Truong, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S685 - S685
  • [48] Does IGRT ensure target dose coverage of head and neck IMRT patients?
    Graff, Pierre
    Hu, Weigang
    Yom, Sue S.
    Pouliot, Jean
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 104 (01) : 83 - 90
  • [49] Modeling dose delivery accuracy of IMRT head-and-neck cancer treatment
    O'Daniel, J.
    Garden, A.
    Wang, H.
    Asper, J.
    Ang, K.
    Ahamad, A.
    Schwartz, D.
    Rosenthal, D.
    Morisson, W.
    Zhang, L.
    Tung, S.
    Mohan, R.
    Dong, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2189 - 2189
  • [50] The effect of patient geometry on the dose distributions for IMRT plans of head and neck cancer
    Helal, A. M.
    Przeslak, A. J.
    Morgan, D. A. L.
    Perkins, A. C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) : S31 - S31